Financial incentive schemes in primary care

References

• DoranTLesson from early experience with pay for performanceDis Manage Health Outcomes2008166977
   Google Scholar
• PeckhamSWallaceAPay-for-performance schemes in primary care: what have we learnt?GillamSSiriwardenaNThe Quality and Outcomes Framework – Transforming General Practice. (Chap. 10)OxfordRadcliffe2010137146
   Google Scholar
• SchoenCOsbornRDotyMMSquiresDPeughJApplebaumSAA survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiencesHealth Aff (Millwood)200928w1171w118319884491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GillamSSiriwardenaNSteelNPay for performance in the UK: the impact of the quality and outcomes frameworkAnn Fam Med20121046146822966110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonaldJPrimary Health Care: Medicine in its PlaceLondonEarthscan1992
   Google Scholar
• PeckhamSExworthyMPrimary Care in the UK: Policy, Organisation and ManagementBasingstokePalgrave2003
   Google Scholar
• StarfieldBPrimary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and TechnologyNew YorkOxford University Press1998
   Google Scholar
• HoggWRowanMRusssellGGeneauRMuldoonLFramework for primary care organization: the importance of a structural domainQual Health Care200820308313
   Google Scholar
• CampbellSMRolandMOBuetowSADefining quality of careSoc Sci Med2000511611162511072882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StarfieldBShiLMacinkoJContribution of primary health care to health systems and healthMilbank Q20058345750216202000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DonabedianAExplorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Volume 1: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its AssessmentAnn Arbor, MIHealth Administration Press1980
   Google Scholar
• MaxwellRJQuality assessment in healthBr Med J1984288147014726426606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of MedicineCrossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st CenturyWashington, DCNational Academy Press2001
   Google Scholar
• GillamSSiriwardenaNQuality Improvement in Primary Care – The Essential GuideOxfordRadcliffe2014
   Google Scholar
• WilsonTRolandMHamCThe contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patientsJ R Soc Med200699242816388052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoulterAEngaging Patients in Their HealthcareOxfordPicker Institute Europe2006
   Google Scholar
• Sans-CorralesMPujol-RiberaEGene-BadiaJPasarin-RuaMIIglesias-PerezICasajuana-BrunetJFamily medicine attributes related to satisfaction, health and costsFam Pract20062330831616461452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiuffridaAGosdenTForlandFTarget payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesCochrane Database Syst Rev19994CD000531
   Google Scholar
• WhiteKFowlerPBradleyFEvidence based medicineLancet1995346837840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhalleyDGravelleHSibbaldBEffect of the new contract on GPs’ working lives and perceptions of quality of care: a longitudinal surveyBr J Gen Pract20085881418186990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CampbellSReevesDEffects of pay for performance on quality of care in EnglandN Engl J Med200936136837819625717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HouleSKMcAlisterFAJackeviciusCAChuckAWTsuyukiRTDoes performance-based remuneration for individual health care practitioners affect patient care? A systematic reviewAnn Intern Med201215788989923247940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottASiveyPAit OuakrimDThe effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physiciansCochrane Database Syst Rev20119CD008451
   Google Scholar
• Chaix-CouturierCDurand-ZaleskiIJollyDDurieuxPEffects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issuesInt J Qual Health Care20001213314210830670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GosdenTForlandFKristiansenISImpact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic reviewJ Health Serv Res Policy20016445511219360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChristiansonJLeathermanSSutherlandKFinancial Incentives, Healthcare Providers and Quality Improvements: A Review of the EvidenceLondonThe Health Foundation2008
   Google Scholar
• LangdownCPeckhamSThe use of financial incentives to help improve health outcomes: is the quality and outcomes framework fit for purpose? A systematic reviewJ Public Health2014362251258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GravelleHSuttonMMaADoctor Behaviour Under a Pay for Performance Contract: Further Evidence from the Quality and Outcomes Framework2008YorkCentre for Health Economics, University of York CHE Research Paper
   Google Scholar
• McDonaldRHarrisonSChecklandKCampbellSRolandRImpact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: an ethnographic studyBMJ20073341357136017580318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeanGSuttonMGuthrieBDeprivation and the quality of primary care services: evidence of the persistence of the inverse care law from the UK quality and outcomes frameworkJ Epidemiol Community Health20066091792217053278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TownRKaneRJohnsonPButlerMEconomic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive careAm J Prev Med20052823424015710282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetersenLWoodwardLUrechTDawCSookananSDoes pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?Ann Int Med200614265272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CasalinoLGilliesRShortellSExternal incentives, information technology and organised processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseasesJAMA200322434441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonSSmithCTrust and moral motivation: redundant resources in health and social care?Policy Polit200432371386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallMHarrisonS‘It’s about more than money’: financial incentives and internal motivationQual Saf Health Care2005144515691995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlodgrenGEcclesMPShepperdSScottAParmelliEBeyerFRAn overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomesCochrane Database Syst Rev20117CD009255
   Google Scholar
• DoranTFullwoodCKontopantelisEReevesDEffect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes frameworkLancet200837272873618701159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KontopantelisESpringateDAAshworthMWebbRTBuchanIEDoranTInvestigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population studyBMJ2015350h90425733592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlshamsanRMajeedAAshworthMCarJMillettCImpact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic reviewJ Health Serv Res Policy201015317818420555042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van HerckPDe SmedtDAnnemansLRemmenRRosenthalMBSermeusWSystematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health careBMC Health Serv Res20101024720731816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonMDusheikoMSuttonMGravelleHDoranTRolandMEffect of a national pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital conditions for primary care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal studyBMJ2014349g642325389120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalkerSMasonARClaxtonKValue for money and the quality and outcomes framework in primary care in the UK NHSBr J Gen Pract201060213220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CecilEBottleASharlandMSaxenaSImpact of UK primary care policy reforms on short-stay unplanned hospital admissions for children with primary care-sensitive conditionsAnn Fam Med20151321422025964398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlasziouPBuchanHDel MarCWhen financial incentives do more good than harm: a checklistBMJ2012345e504722893568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArielyDGneezyULoewensteinGMazarNLarge stakes and big mistakesRev Econ Stud200976451469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScullardPAbdelhamidASteelNQureshiNDoes the evidence referenced in NICE guidelines reflect a primary care population?Br J Gen Pract201161e112e11721375893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuthrieBPayneKAndersonPMcMurdoMMercerSAdapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidityBMJ20123345e6341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarnettKMercerSNorburyMWattGWykeSGuthrieBEpidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional studyLancet2012380374322579043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaiseySSteelNMarshRGillamSFleetcroftRHoweAEffects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview studyJ Health Serv Res Policy20081313313918573761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LesterHSchmittdielJSelbyJThe impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicatorsBMJ2010340c189820460330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JhaAKJoyntKEOravEJEpsteinAMThe long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomesN Engl J Med20123661606161522455751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-WoodsMMcNicolSMartinGTen challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literatureBMJ Qual Saf201221876884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GillamSSteelNThe quality and outcomes framework – where next?BMJ2013346f65923393112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreeneSENashDBPay for performance: an overview of the literatureAm J Med Qual20092414016318984907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar