Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study

Arvid Birkeland1 Centre for Care Research Western Norway, Bergen;2 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, HaugesundCorrespondence[email protected]

Hanne Tuntland1 Centre for Care Research Western Norway, Bergen;3 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy and Radiography;4 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences

Oddvar Førland1 Centre for Care Research Western Norway, Bergen;5 Faculty of Health Sciences, VID Specialized University

Frode Fadnes Jakobsen1 Centre for Care Research Western Norway, Bergen;4 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences;6 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Nursing, Bergen, Norway

Eva Langeland1 Centre for Care Research Western Norway, Bergen;4 Western Norway University of Applied Sciences;6 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Nursing, Bergen, Norway

Pages 195-203 | Published online: 05 May 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

ParvanehRGlendinningCOrganization and delivery of home care re-ablement: what makes a difference?Health Soc Care Community201119549550321651639
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KingAParsonsMRobinsonEJörgensenDAssessing the impact of a restorative home care service in New Zealand: a cluster randomised controlled trialHealth Soc Care Community201220436537422106952
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TuntlandHAaslundMKEspehaugBFørlandOKjekenIReablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trialBMC Geriatr20151514526537789
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CochraneAFurlongMMcGillowaySMolloyDWStevensonMDon-nellyMTime-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adultsCochrane Database Syst Rev201610CD01082527726122
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WhiteheadPWorthingtonEParryRWalkerMDrummondAInterventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: a systematic reviewClin Rehabil201529111064107625587088
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TessierABeaulieuM-DMcginnCALatulippeREffectiveness of reablement: a systematic reviewHealthc Policy2016114495927232236
PubMedGoogle Scholar
LeggLGladmanJDrummondADavidsonAA systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement servicesClin Rehabil201630874174926374423
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HjelleKMTuntlandHFørlandOAlvsvågHDriving forces for home-based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults’ experiencesHealth Soc Care Community Epub2016124
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WildeAGlendinningC“If they’re helping me then how can I be independent?” The perceptions and experience of users of home-care re-ablement servicesHealth Soc Care Community201220658359022804802
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HjelleKMSkutleOFørlandOAlvsvågHThe reablement team’s voice: a qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablementJ Multidiscip Healthc2016957558527843324
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SteihaugSLippestadJWIsaksenHWernerADevelopment of a model for organisation of and cooperation on home-based rehabilitation – an action research projectDisabil Rehabil201436760861623758348
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MoeABrataasHVInterdisciplinary collaboration experiences in creating an everyday rehabilitation model: a pilot studyJ Multidiscip Healthc2016917318227143911
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SargeantJLoneyEMurphyGEffective interprofessional teams: “contact is not enough” to build a teamJ Contin Educ Health Prof200828422823419058243
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JohanssonGEklundKGosman-HedströmGMultidisciplinary team, working with elderly persons living in the community: a systematic literature reviewScand J Occup Ther201017210111619466676
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WhiteMGutierrezAMcLaughlinCA pilot for understanding interdisciplinary teams in rehabilitation practiceRehabil Nurs201338314215223658128
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HallPInterprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriersJ Interprof Care200519Suppl 118819616096155
PubMedGoogle Scholar
LiaaenJMAProfessional careers’ experience of working with reablement [master]TrondheimFakultet for helse- og sosialvitenskap, Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag2015
Google Scholar
RandströmKWenglerYAsplundKSvedlundMWorking with ‘hands-off’ support: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary teams’ experiences of home rehabilitation for older peopleInt J Older People Nurs201491253323216671
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ThyleforsIPerssonOHellströmDTeam types, perceived efficiency and team climate in Swedish cross-professional teamworkJ Interprof Care200519210211415823885
PubMedGoogle Scholar
DonohueKHoevenaarsRMcEachernJZemanEMehtaSHome-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery: what is the evidence?Rehabil Res Practice20132013875968
Google Scholar
DunerACare planning and decision-making in teams in Swedish elderly care: a study of interprofessional collaboration and professional boundariesJ Interprof Care201327324625323343434
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PellattGPerceptions of interprofessional roles within the spinal cord injury rehabilitation team including commentary by Lingard LInt J Ther Rehabil2005124143150
Google Scholar
LangelandEFørlandOAasEModels for reablement – a followup evaluation in Norwegian municipalities. Norwegian Directorate of HealthCentre for Care Research Western NorwayReport number 6/2016 Report on Norwegian2016
Google Scholar
PattonMQQualitative Research & Evaluation Methods3rd edThousand Oaks, CASage Publications2002
Google Scholar
KruegerACaseyMFocus groups A practical guide for applied research3rd edThousand Oaks, CASage Publications2000
Google Scholar
AlvessonMSkøldbergMReflexive Methodology New Vistas for Qualitative ResearchLondonSage2000
Google Scholar
San Martín-RodríguezLBeaulieuMD’AmourDFerrada-VidelaMThe determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studiesJ Interprof Care200519Suppl 113214716096151
PubMedGoogle Scholar

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date