Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Volume 12, 2019 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
5,707
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

How Do Interprofessional Healthcare Teams Perceive the Benefits and Challenges of Interdisciplinary Ward Rounds

Victoria Walton1 Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, NSW2015, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Anne Hogden1 Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, NSW2015, AustraliaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-7960
ORCID Icon,
Janet C Long2 Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-682X
ORCID Icon,
Julie K Johnson3 Centre for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7757-5529
ORCID Icon &
David Greenfield1 Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, NSW2015, AustraliaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-6025
ORCID Icon
Pages 1023-1032 | Published online: 11 Dec 2019

References

  • Nedfors K, Borg C, Fagerstro C. Communication with physicians in hospital rounds: an interview with nurses. Nord J Nurs Res. 2015;36(3):122–127. doi:10.1177/0107408315606633
  • Walton V, Hogden A, Johnson J, Greenfield D. Ward rounds, participants, roles and perceptions: literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(4):364–379. doi:doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2015-005327142947
  • Gonzalo JD, Kuperman E, Lehman E, Haidet P. Bedside interprofessional rounds: perceptions of benefits and barriers by internal medicine nursing staff, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(10):646–651. doi:10.1002/jhm.224525130404
  • Bhamidipati VS, Elliott DJ, Justice EM, Belleh E, Sonnad SS, Robinson EJ. Structure and outcomes of interdisciplinary rounds in hospitalized medicine patients: a systematic review and suggested taxonomy. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(7):513–523. doi:10.1002/jhm.257526991337
  • Körner M. Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(8):745–755. doi:10.1177/026921551036753820530646
  • Najafi N, Monash B, Mourad M, et al. Improving attending rounds: qualitative reflections from multidisciplinary providers. Hosp Pract. 2015;43(3):186–190. doi:10.1080/21548331.2015.1043181
  • Walton V, Hogden A, Long JC, Johnson J, Greenfield D. Clinicians’ perceptions of rounding processes and effectiveness of clinical communication. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019. doi:10.1111/jep.13248
  • Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90(1061):149–154. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-13116824398594
  • O’Leary KJ, Killarney A, Hansen LO, et al. Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients’ decision control, activation and satisfaction with care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):921–928. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561
  • Ward SA, Workman B. Multidisciplinary teamwork In: Caplan G, editor. Geriatric Medicine an Introduction. Melbourne: IP Communications, Pty. Ltd.; 2014:30–46.
  • Liberati EG, Gorli M, Scaratti G. Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care. Soc Sci Med. 2016;150:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.00226730879
  • Enslev Jensen B, Found PA, Williams SJ, Walley P. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of ward rounds. IJQSS. 2016;8(3):279–297. doi:doi:10.1108/IJQSS-05-2016-0039
  • Stein J, Payne C, Methvin A, et al. Reorganizing a hospital ward as an accountable care unit. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):36–40. doi:10.1002/jhm.228425399928
  • Bazeley P. Qualitative Data Analaysis Practical Strategies. London: Sage; 2013.
  • Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Eval. 2007;2007(114):11–25. doi:10.1002/ev.223
  • Clark KW, Moller S, O’Brien L. Electronic patient journey boards a vital piece of the puzzle in patient flow. Aust Health Rev. 2014;38(3):259–264. doi:10.1071/AH1319224814229
  • Clay-Williams R, Plumb J, Luscombe GM, et al. Improving teamwork and patient outcomes with daily structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds: a multimethod evaluation. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(5):311–317. doi:10.12788/jhm.285029698537
  • O’Leary KJ, Johnson JK, Auerbach AD. Do interdisciplinary rounds improve patient outcomes? Only if they improve teamwork. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(7):524–525. doi:10.1002/jhm.258727149426
  • Merchant NB, Federman DG. Bedside rounds valued but not preferred: perceptions of internal medicine residents and attending physicians in a diverse academic training program. South Med J. 2017;110(8):531–537. doi:10.14423/SMJ.000000000000068928771651
  • Nugus P, Greenfield D, Travaglia J, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. How and where clinicians exercise power: interprofessional relations in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(5):898–909. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.02920609507
  • Bate P. Changing the culture of a hospital: from hierarchy to networked community. Public Adm. 2000;78(3):485. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00215
  • Körner M, Bütof S, Müller C, Zimmermann L, Becker S, Bengel J. Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: a systematic review. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):15–28. doi:10.3109/13561820.2015.105161626709985

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.