Advice for Junior Faculty Regarding Academic Promotion: What Not to Worry About, and What to Worry About

References

• Parker J. Comparing research and teaching in university promotion criteria. High Educ Quarterly. 2008;62(3):237–251. doi:10.1111/hequ.2008.62.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Wootton R. A simple, generalizable method for measuring individual research productivity and its use in the long-term analysis of departmental performance, including between-country comparisons. Health Res Policy Sys. 2013;11:2. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-11-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse TA, McKeachie WJ, Lin Y-G. An experimental investigation of factors affecting university promotion decisions. J Higher Educ. 1978;49(2):177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Analytics Company. Highly cited researchers 2019 — executive summary. 2019. doi:10.3310/hta24060
   Google Scholar
• Bukalski PJ. Guide to Faculty Advancement: Annual Evaluation, Promotion & Tenure. Journal of Film & Video; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA. How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1129–1144. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altbach PG. What counts for academic productivity in research universities? Int Higher Educ. 2015;79:6–7. doi:10.6017/ihe.2015.79.5837
   Google Scholar
• Schimanski LA, Alperin JP. The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: past, present, and future. F1000Res. 2018;7. doi:10.12688/f1000research
   Google Scholar
• McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Nieves CM, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP. Use of the Journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. PeerJ Preprints. 2019;8:e47338.
   Google Scholar
• von Bartheld CS, Houmanfar R, Candido A. Prediction of junior faculty success in biomedical research: comparison of metrics and effects of mentoring programs. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1262. doi:10.7717/peerj.1262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickard CM, McGrail MR, Jones R, et al. Supporting academic publication: evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’ support group. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(5):516–521. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szatmari P, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 11. When your grant gets turned down–part 1: remorse, anger, and reconciliation. Clin Trials. 2012;9(4):447–449. doi:10.1177/1740774512449701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye SK, Fiellin DA. An evidence-based guide to writing grant proposals for clinical research. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(4):274. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordage G, Dawson B. Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions. Med Educ. 2003;37(4):376–385. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01468.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szatmari P, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 12. When your grant gets turned down–part 2: resurrection. Clin Trials. 2012;9(5):660–663. doi:10.1177/1740774512455465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne PE, Chalupa LM. Ten simple rules for getting grants. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006;2(2):e12. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 14. ways to advance your career by saying ‘no’ - part 2: when to say ‘no’, and why. Clin Trials. 2013;10(1):181–187. doi:10.1177/1740774512467238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 15. Ways to advance your career by saying ‘no’–part 3: how to say ‘no’, nicely. Clin Trials. 2013;10(2):340–343. doi:10.1177/1740774513477934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 13. Ways to advance your career by saying ‘no’ - part 1: why to say ‘no’ (nicely), and saying ‘no’ to email. Clin Trials. 2012;9(6):806–808. doi:10.1177/1740774512463177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. On the determinants of academic success as a clinician-scientist. Clin Invest Med. 2001;24(2):94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veroniki AA, Thabane L. Strategies for optimal time management in biostatistical practice. J Biom Biostat. 2019;10(2):432.
   Google Scholar
• Bland CJ, Schmitz CC. Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. J Med Educ. 1986;61(1):22–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, Feldman MD. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med. 2013;88(1):82–89. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827647a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanyam K. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. J Info Sci. 1983;6(1):33–38. doi:10.1177/016555158300600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi A, Schiffauerova A. How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics. 2016;106(3):1093–1116. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Jin Y, Mbuagbaw L, et al. Enhancing research publications and advancing scientific writing in health research collaborations: sharing lessons learnt from the trenches. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:245. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S152681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hativa N, Barak R, Simhi E. Exemplary university teachers: knowledge and beliefs regarding effective teaching dimensions and strategies. J Higher Educ. 2001;72(6):699–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. Twelve tips for effective small-group teaching in the health professions. Med Teach. 1996;18(3):203–207. doi:10.3109/01421599609034161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 3. Priority setting for academic success. Clin Trials. 2011;8(2):235–237. doi:10.1177/1740774510396934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 2. time-management of your clinical practice and teaching. Clin Trials. 2011;8(1):112–114. doi:10.1177/1740774510392393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L. How to set-up a long-distance mentoring program: a framework and case description of mentorship in HIV clinical trials. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013;6:17–23. doi:10.2147/JMDH
   Google Scholar
• Odueyungbo A, Thabane L. Mentoring in biostatistics: some suggestions for reform. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:265–272. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S35792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 21. The presenting complaints, diagnoses and treatments of mentorships in trouble. Part 1: dysfunctional mentorship meetings. Clin Trials. 2014;11(3):376–379. doi:10.1177/1740774513519877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 22. The presenting complaints, diagnoses, and treatments of mentorships in trouble. Part 2: abuses of power. Clin Trials. 2014;11(4):508–511. doi:10.1177/1740774514527652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar