Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights: Are There Signs of an Emerging Discipline? A Systematic Review

References

• Want R. RFID: a key to automating everything. Sci A. 2004;290(1):56–65. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0104-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha D, Mukherjee A. Pervasive computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. IEEE Computer. 2003;36(3):25–31. doi:10.1109/MC.2003.1185214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser M. Hot topics: ubiquitous computing. IEEE Computer. 1993;26(10):71–72. doi:10.1109/2.237456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manyika J, Chui M, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Bisson P, Marrs A. Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute; 2013. Available from: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/disruptive-technologies. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). Available from: http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/on/UNICRI_Centre_Artificial_Robotics. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Nations Unies. Union Internationale de Telecommunications. United Nations Activities on Artificial Intelligence. Geneva: ITU Publications; 2018. Available from: https://www.itu.int/pub/S-GEN-UNACT-2018-1. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. High-level expert group on Artificial Intelligence; 2018. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil de l’Union Européenne. Plan coordonné pour le développement et l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle. Doc. 6177/19. Bruxelles: Conseilde l’Union Européenne [Coordinated plan for the development and use of artificial intelligence. Doc. 6177/19. Brussels: Council of the European Union]; 2019. Available from: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6177-2019-INIT/fr/pdf. Accessed January 12, 2022. French.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Européenne. Lignes directrices en matiere d’ethique pour une IA digne de confiance. Bruxelles: Commission Européenne [(European Commission. Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Brussels: European Commission]; 2019. Available from: https://justicia.openum.ca/files/sites/181/2019/10/EthicsguidelinesfortrustworthyAI-FRpdf.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2022. French.
   Google Scholar
• Beitz CR. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2012. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572458.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Sucharitkul S. Multi-dimensional concept of human rights in international law. Notre Dame L. Rev. 2014;62:305.
   Google Scholar
• Helleringer G, Kiteri G. Le rayonnement des droits de l’Homme et des droits fondamentaux en droit privé. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé [The influence of human rights and fundamental rights in private law. International Journal of Comparative Law]. 2014;66(2):283–336. French. doi:10.3406/ridc.2014.20388
   Google Scholar
• Henette-Vauchez S, Roman D. Droits de l’homme et libertés fondamentales [Human rights and fundamental freedoms]. Paris: Dalloz (Hypercours); 2020. French
   Google Scholar
• Langford M, ed. Social Rights Jurisprudence. Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson EH, ed. Encyclopedia of Human Rights. London: Taylor & Francis; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HY, Zawieska K. From responsible robotics towards a human rights Regime oriented to the challenges of robotics and artificial intelligence. Ethic Inf Technol. 2017;22:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Bhojwani R. Artificial intelligence and human rights: are they convergent or parallel to each other? Novum Jus. 2018;12(2):13–38. doi:10.14718/NovumJus.2018.12.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisse M. Human rights and artificial intelligence: an urgently needed agenda. Hum Rights Q. 2019;41:1–16. doi:10.1353/hrq.2019.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Moher D. [Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures.]. Med Clin. 2005;125(Suppl 1):8–13. Spanish. doi:10.1016/S0025-7753(05)72203-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc M. La notion de discipline scientifique et ses enjeux sociaux [The notion of scientific discipline and its social issues]. Politique. 1998;15:23–51. French.
   Google Scholar
• Affergan F, Valade B. Discipline. In: Mesure S, Savidan P, editors. Le Dictionnaire Des Sciences Humaines [The Dictionary of the Humanities]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2006:278–284. French.
   Google Scholar
• Boure R. Réflexions autour de l’institutionnalisation des disciplines [Reflections on the institutionalization of disciplines]. Communication. 2005;24(1):9–37. French. doi:10.4000/communication.3236
   Google Scholar
• Artificial intelligence, human rights and migration. School of Law, Queen Mary London University. Available from: https://www.qmul.ac.uk/law/postgraduate/courses/llm/modules/llm/items/solm240-artificial-intelligence-human-rights-and-migration.html. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Master of arts human rights in the digital society. Tallinn University: School of Governance, Law and Society. Available from: https://www.tlu.ee/en/yti/human-rights-digital-society. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Sychev V. La menace des robots tueurs, Le Courrier de l’Unesco, Intelligence artificielle Promesses et menaces [The threat of killer robots, The Unesco Courier, Artificial Intelligence Promises and Threats]. Paris. 2018:25–27. French.
   Google Scholar
• Latanero M. Big data analytics and human rights. In: Land MK, Aronson JD, editors. New Technologies in Human Rights Laws and Practice. Cambridge University Press; 2018:149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum H. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Anand S Artificial intelligence – literature review. India: The Centre for Internet Society; 2017. Available from: https://cis-india.org/internetgovernance/files/artificial-intelligence-literature-review. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Villani C, Schoenauer M, Bonnet Y, et al. Donner un sens à l’intelligence. Pour une stratégie nationale et européenne [Making intelligence. For a national and European strategy]; 2018. Available from: https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/37225-donner-un-sens-lintelligence-artificielle-pour-une-strategie-nation. Accessed January 12, 2022. French.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. UNICRI centre for artificial intelligence and robotics. The Hague, The Netherlands; 2019. Available from: http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/on/UNICRI_Centre_Artificial_Robotics. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union. United nations activities on artificial intelligence. Geneva: ITU; 2018. Available from: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/gen/S-GEN-UNACT-2018-1-PDF-E.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kane TB. Artificial intelligence in politics: establishing ethics. IEEE Technol Soc Mag. 2019;38(1):72–80. doi:10.1109/MTS.2019.2894474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis J, Santo P, Melão N. Influence of artificial intelligence on public employment and its impact on politics: a systematic literature review. Braz J Oper Prod Manag. 2021;18(3):1–22. doi:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miailhe N. The geopolitics of artificial intelligence: the return of empires. Polit Étrang. 2018;I:105–117. doi:10.3917/pe.183.0105
   Google Scholar
• Gupta BM, Dhawan SM, Gupta RP. Indicators of S&T publications output: developed versus developing countries. DESIDOC J Libr Inf Technol. 2007;27(1):5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Groth OJ, Nitzberg M, Zehr D, Straube T, Kaatz-Dubberke T. Comparison of national strategies to promote artificial intelligence. Report. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mpinga EK, Leslie L, Chastonay P. Health and human rights: epistemological status and perspectives of development. Med Health Care Philos. 2011;14(3):237–247. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9310-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammers N. Social movements and the social construction of human rights human rights quarterly. Hum Rights Q. 1999;21(4):980–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields A, Narr W. Human rights as holistic concept. Hum Rights Q. 1992;14(1):1–20. doi:10.2307/762549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly J. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Yudkowsky E. Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In: Bostrom N, Cirkovic MM, editors. Global Catastrophic Risks. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlhauser L, Salamon A. Intelligence explosion: evidence and import. In: Eden A, Moor J, Søraker J, Steinhart E, editors. Singularity Hypotheses. The Frontiers Collection. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2102.
   Google Scholar
• Hou R. The commercialisation of internet-opinion management: how the market is engaged in state control in China. New Media Soc. 2020;22(12):2238–2256. doi:10.1177/1461444819889959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar