Exploring Risk, Antecedents and Human Costs of Living with a Retained Surgical Item: A Narrative Synthesis of Australian Case Law 1981–2018

References

• Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, et al. Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(94):201–209F. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.159293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386:569–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Surgical Outcomes Study Group. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective Cohort Study in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(5):601–609. doi:10.1093/bja/aew316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story DA, Leslie K, Myles PS, et al. Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON Study): a Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(10):1022–1030. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06478.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story DA. Postoperative complications in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON Study). Perioper Med. 2013;2(1):16. doi:10.1186/2047-0525-2-16
   Google Scholar
• Woodfield J, Deo P, Davidson A, Yen-Ting Chen T, van Rij A. Patient reporting of complications after surgery: what impact does documenting postoperative problems from the perspective of the patient using telephone interview and postal questionnaires have on the identification of complications after surgery? BMJ Open. 2019;9(e028561):10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn T, Davis J, Osborne S. Retained surgical items: lessons from Australian case law of items unintentionally left behind in patients after surgery. J Law Med. 2019;26(4):841–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt-Bruce SD, Cook CH, Steinberg SM, Stawicki SP. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system. J Surg Res. 2014;190(2):429–436. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qurayshi ZH, Hauch AT, Slakey DP, Kandil E. Retained foreign bodies: risk and outcomes at the national level. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):749–759. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(3):229–235. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa021721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ellison EC, Anderson HL, et al. Intravascular retained surgical items: a Multicenter Study of risk factors. J Surg Res. 2012;178(1):519–523. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands A. Risk factors associated with incorrect surgical counts. AORN J. 2012;96(3):272–284. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Wang CF, Cook C, Whitmill ML, et al. Risk factors for retained surgical foreign bodies: a meta-analysis. OPUS Scientist. 2009;3(2):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zarenezhad M, Gholamzadeh S, Hedjazi A, et al. Three years evaluation of retained foreign bodies after surgery in Iran. Ann Med Surg. 2017;15:22–25. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Retained surgical sponges: a Descriptive Study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to 2017. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12(20):8. doi:10.1186/s13037-018-0166-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian College of Perioperative Nurses Ltd. ACORN Standards for Perioperative Nursing in Australia. 15th ed. Adelaide, SA: Australian College of Perioperative Nurses Ltd; 2018:75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13–18. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f633be
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cima R, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, Storsveen A, Weisbrod C, Deschamps C. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign objects in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(1):80–87. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stawicki SP, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Ahmed HM, et al. Retained surgical items: a problem yet to be solved. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp CC, Kagarise MJ, Nelson SM, et al. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2285 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):524–533. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams TL, Tung DK, Steelman VM, Chang PK, Szekendi MK. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(3):354–364. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman VM, Alasagheirin MH. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity. Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):955–960. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1556
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Smits M, Zwaan L, Lubberding S, van der Wal G, Wagner C. To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(49):10. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Accreditation outcome results and evidence of implementation of the national safety and quality health service (NSQHS) standards Sydney. ACSQHC; 2012. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Accreditation-Outcome-Results-and-Evidence_NSQHS_-Standards-Web-Upload-11-Feb-2013-PDF-300KB.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. Report on Government Services (All Reports from 2005–2018). Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Baude W, Chilton AS, Malani A. Making doctrinal work more rigorous: lessons from systematic reviews. U Chi L Rev. 2017;84:37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CR. Tall Oaks from Little Acorns Grow: Commemorating 40 Years 1977–2017, ACORN Australian College of Perioperative Nurses (Foreword by Sarah Bird). Lyndoch, SA: Australian College of Perioperative Nurses, Ltd (ACORN); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme; 2006. Available from: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1-April2006.pdf. Accessed Jan 20, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–770. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot M, Page K, Worrall-Carter L. Reason’s accident causation model: application to adverse events in acute care. Contemp Nurs. 2012;43(1):22–28. doi:10.5172/conu.2012.43.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott v' Bickerstaff [1999] NSWCA 453.
   Google Scholar
• Gaynor v Milton;Ulladulla Hospital (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales Court of Appeal, Hope JA, Glass JA and Mahoney JJA, 5 November 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes v Minister for Health [1999] WASA 131.
   Google Scholar
• Ives v Australian Capital Territory and Anor. (Unreported, Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, Higgins J, 20 October 1995, 8 December 1995).
   Google Scholar
• The Australian Capital Territory v Ives (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Gallop, Wilcox and Finn JJ, 16 April 1996, 26 July 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kenjar v Australian Capital Territory [2014] ACTSC 69.
   Google Scholar
• Langley & Warren v Glandore Pty Ltd & Thomson [1997] QCA 342.
   Google Scholar
• Miller v Broadbent (Unreported, Supreme Court of Queensland, Muir J, 6 August 1999, 12 August 1999).
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan v Sakker (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 329; [2011] NSWDC 60.
   Google Scholar
• Smith v Marcus (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Studdert J, 6 March 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Record of Investigation into Death (without inquest) of James Stirling McKinlay (Tasmanian Coroners Court 2013, TASCD 142).
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh A, Dubrow D, Hobill S, Morgan J, Matar J. Limitation periods: a state-by- state review [time limitations on personal injury actions]. Precedent. 2010;100:24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Uluçay T, Dizdar MG, SunayYavuz M, Aşırdizer M. The importance of medico-legal evaluation in a case with intraabdominal gossypiboma. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;198(1):e15–e18. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abujudeh HH, Aran S, Besheli LD, Miguel K, Halpern E, Thrall J. Outpatient falls prevention program outcome: an increase, a plateau, and a decrease in incident reports. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):620–626. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett S, Jorm C. Strengthening safety statistics: how to make hospital safety data more useful. Grattan Institute; 2017. Available from: https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/893-strengthening-safety-statistics.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen K, Dayton E, Keyes MA, Carayon P, Hughes R. Understanding adverse events: a human factors framework. In: Hughes R, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Vol. 1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008:67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert PD, Thomas MJW, Deakin A, Runciman WB, Carson-Stevens A, Braithwaite J. A qualitative content analysis of retained surgical items: learning from root cause analysis investigations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020;32(3):184–189. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzaa005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark S, Oakley J. Informed consent and surgeon’s performance. J Med Philos. 2004;29(1):11–35. doi:10.1076/jmep.29.1.11.30415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil D, Clarke J, Oakley JG. Public reporting of individual surgeon performance information: United Kingdom developments and Australian issues. Med J Aust. 2004;181(5):266–268. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009: safe surgery saves lives. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44185/9789241598552_eng.pdf;jsessionid=3CAB9A60716A6C5047E465C60E640E6C?sequence=1. Accessed August 10, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnar W, Soncrant C, Lynn MM, Neily J, Tesema Y, Nylander W. The impact of surgical count technology on retained surgical items rates in the veterans health administration. J Patient Saf. 2020;16(4):255–258. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlström M, Partanen P, Azimirad M, Selander T, Turunen H. Patient participation in patient safety—an exploration of promoting factors. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(1):84–92. doi:10.1111/jonm.12651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian Sentinel Events List (Version 2). Review Summary. Sydney, Australia: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• The Joint Commission. Frequently asked questions: retained foreign body after surgery; 2014. Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/retained_foreign_objects_faqs.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Moppett IK, Moppett SH. Surgical caseload and the risk of surgical never events in England. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):17–30. doi:10.1111/anae.13290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):523–530. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alluri RK, Leland H, Heckmann N. Surgical research using national databases. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(20):393. doi:10.21037/atm.2016.10.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar