Patient Involvement During a Pathway of Home-Based Reablement for Older Persons: A Longitudinal Single-Case Study

References

• Eurostat 2019. Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in the EU. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/10166544/KS-02-19%E2%80%91681-EN-N.pdf/c701972f-6b4e-b432-57d2-91898ca94893. Accessed May 18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Clotworthy A, Kusumastuti S, Westendorp RGJ. Reablement through time and space: a scoping review of how the concept of ‘reablement’ for older people has been defined and operationalized. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:61. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01958-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane A, McGilloway S, Furlong M, Molloy DW, Stevenson M, Donnelly M. Home-care “re-ablement” services for maintaining and improving older adults’ functional independence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD010825. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010825
   Google Scholar
• Tessier A, Beaulieu MD, Mcginn CA, Latulippe R. Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review. Healthc Policy. 2016;11(4):49–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zingmark M, Norström F, Lindholm L, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Gustafsson S. Modelling long-term cost-effectiveness of health promotion for community-dwelling older people. Eur J Ageing. 2019;16(4):395–404. doi:10.1007/s10433-019-00505-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, Burton E. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a Delphi study. Ageing Soc. 2020;1–16. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersvendsen T, Jungeilges J, Abildsned E. Empirical evaluation of home-based reablement: a review. Nord J Health Econ. 2021;1–18. doi:10.5617/njhe.7838
   Google Scholar
• Aspinal F, Glasby J, Rostgaard T, Tuntland H, Westendorp RG. Reablement: supporting older people towards independence. Age Ageing. 2016;45(5):574–578. doi:10.1093/ageing/afw094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Espehaug B, Forland O, Hole AD, Kjerstad E, Kjeken I. Reablement in community-dwelling adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DI, Gottschalk M, Eng C, Weber S, Tinetti ME. The design and implementation of a restorative care model for home care. Gerontologist. 2001;41(2):257–263. doi:10.1093/geront/41.2.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Skovdal K, Landmark BT, Haulelien H. Ideal and reality: community healthcare professionals’ experiences of user-involvement in reablement. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27:907–916. doi:10.1111/hsc.12708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Hauge S, Landmark BT, Skovdal K. Control as a core component of user involvement in reablement: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1079–1088. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S269200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe A, Brataas HV. Interdisciplinary collaboration experiences in creating an everyday rehabilitation model: a pilot study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;18(9):173–182. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S103696
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. CJOT. 1990;57(2):82–87. doi:10.1177/000841749005700207
   Google Scholar
• Aujoulat I, Marcolongo R, Bonadiman L, Deccache A. Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: a critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(5):1228–1239. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Tong H, Demirel O, Duffy V, Yih Y, Bidassie B. A practical model of value co-creation in healthcare service. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:200–207. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.129
   Google Scholar
• Askheim OP, Christensen K, Fluge S, Guldvik I. User participation in the Norwegian welfare context: an analysis of policy discourses. J Soc Policy. 2016;46(3):583–601. doi:10.1017/S0047279416000817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman Nilsson M. Practical and theoretical knowledge in contrast: teacher educators’ discursive positions. Aust J Teach Educ. 2017;42(8):29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brante T. Professional fields and truth regimes: in search of alternative approaches. Comp Sociol. 2010;9(6):843–886. doi:10.1163/156913310X522615
   Google Scholar
• Vatne S. Brukermedvirkning og involverende pedagogikk. [User participation and involving pedagogy]. In: Brataas, Evensen & Ingstad, editor. Pedagogisk Praksis I Sykepleie. [Nursing Pedagogy]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2019:75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Trappes‐Lomax T, Hawton A. The user voice: older people’s experiences of reablement and rehabilitation. J Integr Care. 2012;20(3):181–195. doi:10.1108/14769011211237528
   Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Landmark BT, Hauge S, Skovdal KI. Eldres erfaring med hverdagsrehabilitering. mestring og muligheter – krav og støtte i dynamisk samspill. [Adults’ experiences with reablement]. Tidsskr Omsorgsforsk. 2016;2(3):212–221. doi:10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2016-03-07
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen AM, Steihaug S. Brukermedvirkning i helsetjenester for eldre – en kvalitativ studie av to kommunale akutte døgnenheter og samarbeidende kommuner. [User participation in healthcare for elderly – a qualitative study]. Tidsskr Omsorgsforsk. 2019;5(2):1–14. doi:10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2019-02-04
   Google Scholar
• Kvæl LAH, Debesay J, Bye A, Bergland A. Health-care professionals’ experiences of patient participation among older patients in intermediate care—at the intersection between profession, market and bureaucracy. Health Expect. 2019;22(5):921–930. doi:10.1111/hex.12896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrstad DN, Testad I, Storm M. Older patients’ participation in hospital admissions through the emergency department: an interview study of healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1136-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony S, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(6):1171–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04998.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom LM, Hellzèn O, Lilja L. “I screamed for help”: a single case study of one sister’s experiences with formal psychiatric care when her brother became mentally ill. Health. 2013;5(3):417–425. doi:10.4236/health.2013.53056
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Method. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Nica A. Iterative thematic inquiry: a new method for analyzing qualitative data. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1–11. doi:10.1177/1609406920955118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangbaek K. Patient involvement in Danish health care. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(5):611–624. doi:10.1108/JHOM-01-2015-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringard Å, Sagan A, Saunes IS, Lindahl AK. Health systems in transition. Health. 2013;15(8):1–162.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim OP. Empowerment as guidance for professional social work: an act of balancing on a slack rope. Eur J Soc Work. 2010;6(3):229–240. doi:10.1080/1369145032000164546
   Google Scholar
• Brataas HV, Thorsnes S, Hargie O. Themes and goals in cancer outpatient–cancer nurse consultations. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(2):184–191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe A, Ingstad K, Brataas HV. Patient influence in home-based reablement for older persons: qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:736. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2715-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebehely M, Meagher G. Nordic eldercare – weak universalism becoming weaker? J Eur Soc Policy. 2018;28(3):294–308. doi:10.1177/0958928717735062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll J, Gautun H. User participation in Norwegian elder care – do local governments follow the lead of care 2020? Tidsskr Omsorgsforsk. 2020;1(6):1–16. doi:10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2020-01-09
   Google Scholar
• Bersvendsen T. Effects of Home-Based Reablement: A Micro-Econometric Approach [Dissertation]. Kristiansand, Norway: University of Agder; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Brataas HV, Evensen AE. Modell for pasientundervisning. In: Brataas, evensen & ingstad, editor. Pedagogisk Praksis I Sykepleie. [Nursing Pedagogy]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2019:75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Stein-Parbury J. Patient & Person. 4th ed. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Australia; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Martens CT. Aging in which place? Connecting aging in place with individual responsibility, housing markets, and the welfare state. J Hous Elder. 2018;32(1):1–11. doi:10.1080/02763893.2017.1393483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar