The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Doctors’ and Registered Nurses’ Working Conditions and Clinical Work – A Cross-Sectional Study in a Norwegian Hospital

References

• Arvanitis S, Loukis EN. Investigating the effects of ICT on innovation and performance of European hospitals: an exploratory study. Eur J Health Economics. 2016;17(4):403–418. doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0686-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayaad O, Alloubani A, Abu Alhajaa E, et al. The role of electronic medical records in improving the quality of health care services: comparative study. Int J Med Inform. 2019;127:63–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert K, Domhoff D, Huter K, et al. Application of digital technologies in nursing practice: results of a mixed methods study on nurses’ experiences, needs and perspectives. Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz Fortbildung Und Qualitaet Im Gesundheitswesen. 2020;158:94–106. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YT, Kim D, Park RW, et al. Association between Full Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Drug Use: antibiotics and Polypharmacy. Healthc Inform Res. 2020;26:68–77. doi:10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns M, Kavanagh A, Curran M, Collier D. ICT supporting clinicians and patients – the key facilitator of integrated care. Int J Integr Care. 2017;17(5):413. doi:10.5334/ijic.3732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrakaki D, Kornelakis A. ‘We can only request what’s in our protocol’: technology and work autonomy in healthcare. New Tech Work Employ. 2016;31(3):223–237. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong JY, Ivory CH, VanHouten CB, et al. Disappearing expertise in clinical automation: barcode medication administration and nurse autonomy. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2021;28:232–238. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansler JP. Challenges in user-driven optimization of EHR: a case study of a large Epic implementation in Denmark. Int J Med Inform. 2021;148. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheraghi-Sohi S, Calnan M. Discretion or discretions? Delineating professional discretion: the case of English medical practice. Soc Sci Med. 2013;96:52–59. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore EC, Tolley CL, Bates DW, et al. A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2020;27(5):798–807. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons S. A failed panopticon: surveillance of nursing practice via new technology. New Tech Work Employ. 2003;18(2):143–153. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean S, Lewis J, Ferguson C. Editorial: is technology responsible for nurses losing touch? J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(5–6):583–585. doi:10.1111/jocn.13470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerstrom C, Tuvesson H, Axelsson L, Nilsson L. The role of ICT in nursing practice: an integrative literature review of the Swedish context. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(3):434–448. doi:10.1111/scs.12370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupret K. Working around technologies—invisible professionalism? New Tech Work Employ. 2017;32:174–187. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott A. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson E. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin J, Webster A. Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identities and power. Sociological Rev. 1998;46(4):781–802. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts J. Professionalism: value and ideology. Current Sociology. 2013;61(5–6):778–796. doi:10.1177/0011392113479316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie G, Croft C. Examining hybrid nurse managers as a case of identity transition in healthcare: developing a balanced research agenda. Work Employment Soc. 2015;29(5):855–865. doi:10.1177/0950017015572581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molleman E, Rink F. The antecedents and consequences of a strong professional identity among medical specialists. Social Theory & Health. 2015;13(1):46–61. doi:10.1057/sth.2014.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyridonidis D, Calnan M. Are new forms of professionalism emerging in medicine? The case of the implementation of NICE guidelines. Health Sociology Rev. 2011;20(4):394–409. doi:10.5172/hesr.2011.20.4.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell B, Trusson C, De S. The ambiguities of ‘managed professionalism’: working in and with IT. In: Wilkinson A, Hislop D, Coupland C, editors. Perspectives on Contemporary Professional Work: Challenges and Experiences. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016:361.
   Google Scholar
• Karasek RA Jr. Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: implications for Job Redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(2):285–308. doi:10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N. J: Laurence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakaki D, Klecun E, Cornford T. Changes in healthcare professional work afforded by technology: the introduction of a national electronic patient record in an English hospital. Organization. 2016;23(2):206. doi:10.1177/1350508414545907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent B, Redley B, Wickramasinghe N, et al. Exploring nurses’ reactions to a novel technology to support acute health care delivery. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(15–16):2340–2351. doi:10.1111/jocn.12881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath P. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J. 2012;18(2):124–134. doi:10.1177/1460458211435425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow SK, Chin WY, Lee HY, Leung HC, Tang FH. Nurses’ perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(11‐12):1685–1696. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony DL, Stablein T. Privacy in practice: professional discourse about information control in health care. J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(2):207–226. doi:10.1108/JHOM-12-2014-0220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastaldi L, Radaelli G, Lettieri E, et al. Professionals’ use of ICT in hospitals: the interplay between institutional and rational factors. Int J Tech Management. 2019;80:85–106. doi:10.1504/ijtm.2019.099768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook JI, Li L, Georgiou A, Paoloni R, Cullen J. Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre-post, time and motion study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(6):1150–1158. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morquin D. Legitimate resistance without technophobia: analysis of electronic medical records impacts on the medical profession. Rev Med Interne. 2020;41(9):617–621. doi:10.1016/j.revmed.2020.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Quinn JB, Ghoshal S. The Strategy Process. London: Prentice Hall; 1995:p.XVIII, 985 s.: ill.
   Google Scholar
• Russell B. Professional call centres, professional workers and the paradox of the algorithm: the case of telenursing. Work Employ Soc. 2012;26:195–210. doi:10.1177/0950017011433155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumb JJ, Hains I, Parr MJ, Milliss D, Herkes R, Westbrook JI. Technology meets tradition: the perceived impact of the introduction of information and communication technology on ward rounds in the intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform. 2017;105:49–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højlund H, Villadsen K. Technologies in caregiving: professionals’ strategies for engaging with new technology. New Tech Work Employ. 2020;35:178–194. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meester K, Das T, Hellemans K, et al. Impact of a standardized nurse observation protocol including MEWS after Intensive Care Unit discharge. Resuscitation. 2013;84(2):184–188. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55(2):87–101. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(99)00011-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa S, Nielsen JB, Aldahmash AM, et al. Willingness to use digital health tools in patient care among health care professionals and students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: quantitative cross-sectional survey. JMIR Med Educ. 2021;7:e18590–e18590. doi:10.2196/18590
   Google Scholar
• Asemahagn MA. Health professionals’ Challenge in using ICTs to manage their Patients: the case of Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Online J Nursing Informatics. 2016;20:4.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy R, Steinbach T, Knight J, et al. Framework to Enhance Nurses’ Use of EMR. Hosp Top. 2018;96:85–93. doi:10.1080/00185868.2018.1488545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millum J, Wendler D, Emanuel EJ. The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: progress but Many Remaining Challenges. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2143–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar