Exploring Perceptions and Acceptance of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling among Bereaved Relatives and Health-Care Professionals in Rwanda

References

• Feroz AS, Paganelli C, Bunei M, et al. A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):120. doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00969-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafritz DA, Shouval D, Sherman HI, et al. Integration of hepatitis B virus DNA into the genome of liver cells in chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Studies in percutaneous liver biopsies and post-mortem tissue specimens. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(18):1067–1073. doi:10.1056/nejm198110293051807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael GJ, Williamson ME, Schmidt ME, et al. Genetic marker identification in largemouth bass with electrophoresis of low-risk tissues. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1986;115:459. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1986)115<455:GMIILB>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morizot DC, Schmidt ME, Carmichael GJ, et al. Minimally invasive tissue sampling. In: Whitmore DH, editor. Electrophoretic and Isoelectric Focusing Techniques in Fisheries Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1990:143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Paganelli CR, Goco NJ, McClure EM, et al. The evolution of minimally invasive tissue sampling in postmortem examination: a narrative review. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1792682. PMC7480574. doi:10.1080/16549716.2020.1792682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Laan PA. Fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy: an update on 2 common minimally invasive tissue sampling modalities. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124(12):862–870. doi:10.1002/cncy.21742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo P, Martínez MJ, Ussene E, et al. Validity of a minimally invasive autopsy for cause of death determination in adults in Mozambique: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002171. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, van Dijke CF, et al. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009;250(3):897–904. doi:10.1148/radiol.2503080421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghayev E, Thali MJ, Sonnenschein M, et al. Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;166(2):199–203. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, et al. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. RadioGraphics. 2006;26(5):1305–1333. doi:10.1148/rg.265065001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maixenchs M, Anselmo R, Zielinski-Gutiérrez E, et al. Willingness to know the cause of death and hypothetical acceptability of the minimally invasive autopsy in six diverse African and Asian settings: a mixed methods socio-behavioural study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002172. PMC5119724. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence S, Namusanya D, Hamuza A, et al. Hypothetical acceptability of hospital-based post-mortem pediatric minimally invasive tissue sampling in Malawi: the role of complex social relationships. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246369. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakislova N, Marimon L, Ismail MR, et al. Minimally invasive autopsy practice in COVID-19 cases: biosafety and findings. Pathogens. 2021;10(4):412. doi:10.3390/pathogens10040412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo P, Ussene E, Ismail MR, et al. Pathological methods applied to the investigation of causes of death in developing countries: minimally invasive autopsy approach. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0132057. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakislova N, Fernandes F, Lovane L, et al. Standardization of minimally invasive tissue sampling specimen collection and pathology training for the child health and mortality prevention surveillance network. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_4):S302–S10. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins J, O’Mara Sage E, Kone A, et al. Using participatory workshops to assess alignment or tension in the community for minimally invasive tissue sampling prior to start of child mortality surveillance: lessons from 5 sites across the CHAMPS network. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_4):S280–S90. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby EH, Offiah AC, Cohen MC. Initial experiences of a minimally invasive autopsy service. a report of the techniques and observations in the first 11 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015;18(1):24–29. doi:10.2350/14-06-1503-OA.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Al-Masud A, Maixenchs M, et al. Rumor surveillance in support of minimally invasive tissue sampling for diagnosing the cause of child death in low-income countries: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0244552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das MK, Arora NK, Rasaily R, et al. Perceptions of the healthcare providers regarding acceptability and conduct of minimal invasive tissue sampling (MITS) to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):833. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05693-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aceituno AM, Ntakirutimana G, Ndayisaba MC, et al. Building capacity and infrastructure at hospitals implementing minimally invasive tissue sampling. ASTMH, editor. American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) Annual Meeting; November 2020; Virtual meeting: ASMTH; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bassat Q, Castillo P, Alonso PL, et al. Resuscitating the dying autopsy. PLoS Med. 2016;13(1):e1001927–e. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Cos T, Guizani M, et al. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(11):1106–1110. doi:10.1002/pd.4435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getachew A. Assessment of guidance and counselling service centre in higher education institutions: a qualitative research. Int J Sch Cogn Psychol. 2020;7(2):223. doi:10.35248/2469-9837.19.6.223
   Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassum LA. Refusal to autopsy: a societal practice in Pakistan context. J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014;5(5):198.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed M, Kharoshah MA. Autopsy in Islam and current practice in Arab Muslim countries. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;23:80–83. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feroz A, Ali AS, Ibrahim MN, et al. Perceptions of health professionals regarding minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) to identify the cause of death in stillbirths and neonates: results from a qualitative study. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019;5(1):17. doi:10.1186/s40748-019-0112-x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tabular List. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Chawana R, Baillie V, Izu A, et al. Potential of minimally invasive tissue sampling for attributing specific causes of childhood deaths in South Africa: a pilot, epidemiological study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Supplement_4):S361–S73. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar