Coping Profiles and Differences in Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Clients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Latent Profile Analysis

References

• World Health Organization. Infertility. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility. Accessed December 27, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):873–882. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion DoRH. What is assisted reproductive technology? Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/whatis.html. Accessed July 9, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton J, Domar AD. Chapter 10 - Psychological distress and infertility: prevalence, impact, and interventions. In: Vaamonde D, Hackney AC, Garcia-Manso JM, editors. Fertility, Pregnancy, and Wellness. Elsevier; 2022:163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Taebi M, Kariman N, Montazeri A, Majd HA. Infertility stigma: a qualitative study on feelings and experiences of infertile women. Int J Fertil Steril. 2021;15(3):189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tang Y, Wang Y. Predictors and incidence of depression and anxiety in women undergoing infertility treatment: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0284414. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang MZ, Sun YC, Gau ML, Puthussery S, Kao CH. First-time mothers’ experiences of pregnancy and birth following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Taiwan. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(1):10. doi:10.1186/s41043-019-0167-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Meier C, Bodenmann G, Mörgeli H, Jenewein J. Dyadic coping, quality of life, and psychological distress among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their partners. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:583–596. doi:10.2147/copd.S24508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molgora S, Fenaroli V, Acquati C, De Donno A, Baldini MP, Saita E. Examining the role of dyadic coping on the marital adjustment of Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Front Psychol. 2019;10:415. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitkamp K, Feger F, Landolt SA, Roth M, Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:722740. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurkiw J, Johnson MD. Perceived stress, supportive dyadic coping, and sexual communication in couples. J Soc Pers Relat. 2021;38(5):1729–1737. doi:10.1177/0265407521996446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penley JA, Tomaka J, Wiebe JS. The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med. 2002;25(6):551–603. doi:10.1023/a:1020641400589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurlo MC, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Vallone F. Re-examining the role of coping strategies in the associations between infertility-related stress dimensions and state-anxiety: implications for clinical interventions with infertile couples. Front Psychol. 2020;11:614887. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff A, Balsom AA, Gordon JL. Psychological coping strategies associated with improved mental health in the context of infertility. Arch Women’s Mental Health. 2021;24:73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordăchescu DA, Paica CI, Boca AE, et al. Anxiety, difficulties, and coping of infertile women. Healthcare. 2021;9(4). doi:10.3390/healthcare9040466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai J, Zheng J, Dong Y, Wang K, Cheng C, Jiang H. Psychological distress, dyadic coping, and quality of life in infertile clients undergoing assisted reproductive technology in China: a single-center, cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:2715–2723. doi:10.2147/jmdh.S393438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing X, Gu W, Zhang L, et al. Coping strategies mediate the association between stigma and fertility quality of life in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. BMC Women's Health. 2021;21(1):386. doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01525-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedro J, Sobral MP, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Leal C, Costa ME, Martins MV. Couples’ discontinuation of fertility treatments: a longitudinal study on demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial risk factors. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(2):217–224. doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0844-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzioglu F, Turk R, Yucel C, Dilbaz S, Cinar O, Karahalil B. The effect of anxiety and depression scores of couples who underwent assisted reproductive techniques on the pregnancy outcomes. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16(2):441–450. doi:10.4314/ahs.v16i2.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzeszutek M, Pięta M, Van Hoy A, et al. Coping profiles, depression, and body image anxiety during the Covid-19 pandemic: comparative analysis of females with thyroid diseases and a non-clinical sample. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0282302. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• January AM, Kelly EH, Russell HF, Zebracki K, Vogel LC. Patterns of coping among caregivers of children with spinal cord injury: associations with parent and child well-being. Fam Syst Health. 2019;37(2):150–161. doi:10.1037/fsh0000415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doron J, Trouillet R, Maneveau A, Ninot G, Neveu D. Coping profiles, perceived stress and health-related behaviors: a cluster analysis approach. Health Promot Int. 2015;30(1):88–100. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng CT, Ho SMY, Liu WK, et al. Cancer-coping profile predicts long-term psychological functions and quality of life in cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(3):933–941. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4382-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm SV, Li X, Curran MA, Barnett MA. Coping profiles in the context of global environmental threats: a person-centered approach. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022;35(5):609–622. doi:10.1080/10615806.2021.2004132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equat Model. 2007;14(4):535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Arista LJ, Walsh KJ, Randall AK. Dyadic Coping Inventory. In: Lebow J, Chambers A, Breunlin DC, editors. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer International Publishing; 2018:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–976. doi:10.1017/s0033291702006074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):409–415.e3. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19(6):716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminger G, Stein P, Wittenberg J. Mixtures of conditional mean- and covariance-structure models. Psychometrika. 1999;64(4):475–494. doi:10.1007/BF02294568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B. Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cai T, Qian J, Huang Q, Yuan C. Distinct dyadic coping profiles in Chinese couples with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(11):6459–6468. doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06237-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy L, Balázs K. Typical coping patterns: a person-centered approach to coping. New Ideas Psychol. 2023;70:101023. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu L, Chen M, Su W, Yao T, Li X. Effect of intimacy and dyadic coping on psychological distress in pancreatic cancer patients and spousal caregivers. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1040460. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1040460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijres P, Weitkamp K, Bodenmann G, Jenewein J. Discrepancies in dyadic coping: associations with distress and quality of life in couples facing early stage dementia. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1056428. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão T, Schulz MS, Matos PM. Psychological adjustment after breast cancer: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Psycho Oncolo. 2017;26(7):917–926. doi:10.1002/pon.4230
   Google Scholar
• Wesner AC, Gomes JB, Detzel T, Blaya C, Manfro GG, Heldt E. Effect of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for panic disorder in changing coping strategies. Compreh Psychiatry. 2014;55(1):87–92. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar