112
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Exploring Goal-Setting and Achievement Within Reablement: A Comparative Case Study of Three Countries

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 1203-1218 | Received 09 Nov 2023, Accepted 07 Mar 2024, Published online: 20 Mar 2024

References

  • Lee R, Mason A. Cost of Aging. Finance Dev. 2017;54(1):7–9.
  • Bloom DE, Canning D, Lubet A. Global population aging: facts, challenges, solutions & perspectives. Daedalus. 2015;144(2):80–92. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00332
  • World Health Organization. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021–2030. World Health Organization; 2021.
  • Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, Burton E. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a Delphi study. Ageing Soc. 2022;42(3):703–718. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000999
  • Mulquiny L, Oakman J. Exploring the experience of reablement: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of older people’s and carers’ views. Health Soc Care Comm. 2022;30(5):e1471–e1483. doi:10.1111/hsc.13837
  • Hjelle KM, Skutle O, Forland O, Alvsvag H. The reablement team’s voice: a qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:575–585. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S115588
  • Liaaen J, Vik K. Becoming an enabler of everyday activity: health professionals in home care services experiences of working with reablement. Int J Older People Nurs. 2019;14(4):e12270. doi:10.1111/opn.12270
  • Stausholm MN, Pape-Haugaard L, Hejlesen OK, Secher PH. Reablement professionals’ perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):665. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8
  • Zingmark M, Tuntland H, Burton E. Reablement as a cost-effective option from a health economic perspective. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions. Policy Press; 2023:137–160.
  • Bennett C, Allen F, Hodge S, Logan P. An investigation of reablement or restorative homecare interventions and outcome effects: a systematic review of randomised control trials. Health Soc Care Comm. 2022;30(6):e6586–e6600. doi:10.1111/hsc.14108
  • Clotworthy A, Kusumastuti S, Westendorp RGJ. Reablement through time and space: a scoping review of how the concept of ‘reablement’ for older people has been defined and operationalised. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):61. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01958-1
  • Parsons J, Tuntland H, Nelson M, Westendorp R, Rostgaard T. A cross-country reflection on empirical and theoretical learnings, challenges, and the way forward for reablement. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions. Policy Press; 2023:238–247.
  • Tuntland H, Parsons J, Rostgaard T. Perspectives on institutional characteristics, model features, and theories of reablement. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions. Policy Press; 2023:21–45.
  • Parsons J, Burton E, Graff L, Metzelthin S, O’Connell H, Tuntland H. Reablement as an evolution in home care: a comparison of implementation across five countries. In: Rostgaard T, Parsons J, Tuntland H, editors. Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions. Policy Press; 2023:68–92.
  • Parsons J, Rouse P, Robinson EM, Sheridan N, Connolly MJ. Goal setting as a feature of homecare services for older people: does it make a difference? Age Ageing. 2012;41(1):24–29. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr118
  • Boeykens D, Boeckxstaens P, De Sutter A, et al. Goal-oriented care for patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity in primary care: a scoping review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0262843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262843
  • Buma LE, Vluggen S, Zwakhalen S, Kempen GIJM, Metzelthin SF. Effects on clients’ daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review. Euro J Age. 2022;19(4):903–929. doi:10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3
  • Ryburn B, Wells Y, Foreman P. Enabling Independence: restorative approaches to home care provision for frail older adults. Health Soc Care Community. 2009;17(3):225–234. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00809.x
  • Azim FT, Burton E, Ariza-Vega P, et al. Exploring behavior change techniques for reablement: a scoping review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(2):100401. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100401
  • Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Trappenburg JCA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. Interna J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:86–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001
  • Parsons M, Parsons J, Pillai A, et al. Post-acute care for older people following injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Directors Assoc. 2020;21(3):404–409. e401. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.015
  • Parsons M, Parsons J, Rouse P, et al. Supported Discharge Teams for older people in hospital acute care: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2018;47(2):288–294. doi:10.1093/ageing/afx169
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  • ReAble Network. Reablement or restorative home support | reAble Network. https://reable.auckland.ac.nz/.. Accessed February 21, 2024.
  • Bergen Kommune. Hverdagsrehabilitering. https://www.bergen.kommune.no/innbyggerhjelpen/helse-og-omsorg/helsetjenester/ergoog-fysioterapi/hverdagsrehabilitering. Accessed February 21, 2024.
  • Mouchaers I, Verbeek H, Kempen GIJM, et al. Development and content of a community-based reablement programme (I-MANAGE): a co-creation study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(8):e070890. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070890
  • Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82–87. doi:10.1177/000841749005700207
  • Parsons J, Parsons M. The effect of a designated tool on person-centred goal identification and service planning among older people receiving homecare in New Zealand. Health Soc Care Comm. 2012;20(6):653–662. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01081.x
  • Morris JN, Howard EP, Steel KR. Development of the interRAI home care frailty scale. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):188. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0364-5
  • Etikan I. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am j Theoretic Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  • Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  • Kyngäs H, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M. The application of content analysis in nursing science research; 2020.
  • Atlas.ti [Computer Program]. Version Windows 23.4.0. Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2024.
  • Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16(2):151–155. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x
  • World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  • Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
  • Johnson JM, Hermosura BJ, Price SL, Gougeon L. Factors influencing interprofessional team collaboration when delivering care to community-dwelling seniors: a metasynthesis of Canadian interventions. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(3):376–382. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1758641
  • Randström KB, Wengler Y, Asplund K, Svedlund M. Working with ‘hands-off’ support: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary teams’ experiences of home rehabilitation for older people. Interna J Old People Nurs. 2014;9(1):25–33. doi:10.1111/opn.12013
  • Birkeland A, Tuntland H, Forland O, Jakobsen FF, Langeland E. Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement - A qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:195–203. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S133417
  • Moe A, Brataas HV. Interdisciplinary collaboration experiences in creating an everyday rehabilitation model: a pilot study. J Multidiscip Healthcare. 2016;9:173–182. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S103696
  • Beresford B, Mayhew E, Duarte A, et al. Outcomes of reablement and their measurement: findings from an evaluation of English reablement services. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(6):1438–1450. doi:10.1111/hsc.12814
  • Eliassen M, Moholt JM. Boundary work in task-shifting practices - A qualitative study of reablement teams. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(10):2106–2119. doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2064380
  • Cardoso Barbosa H, de Queiroz Oliveira JA, da Costa J M, et al. Empowerment-oriented strategies to identify behavior change in patients with chronic diseases: an integrative review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(4):689–702. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.011
  • Rooijackers TH, Zijlstra GAR, van Rossum E, et al. Process evaluation of a reablement training program for homecare staff to encourage Independence in community-dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):5. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01936-7
  • Brandão C, Rego G, Duarte I, Nunes R. Social responsibility: a new paradigm of hospital governance? Health Care Anal. 2013;21(4):390–402. doi:10.1007/s10728-012-0206-3
  • Haddiya I, Janfi T, Guedira M. Application of the concepts of social responsibility, sustainability, and Ethics To Healthcare Organizations. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:1029–1033. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S258984
  • International Bioethics Committee. Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on social responsibility and health. UNESCO; 2010.