Clinimetric properties of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) for aged-care residents with moderate to severe dementia

Kreshnik Hoti1 School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia;2 Division of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, Pristina, KosovoCorrespondence[email protected]

Mustafa Atee1 School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

Jeffery D Hughes1 School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

Pages 1037-1044 | Published online: 01 Jun 2018

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

HerrKCoynePJMcCafferyMManworrenRMerkelSPain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendationsPain Manag Nurs201112423025022117755
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LichtnerVDowdingDEsterhuizenPPain assessment for people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment toolsBMC Geriatr20141413825519741
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ShegaJWHoughamGWStockingCBCox-HayleyDSachsGAPain in community-dwelling persons with dementia: frequency, intensity, and congruence between patient and caregiver reportJ Pain Symptom Manage200428658559215589083
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AteeMHotiKParsonsRHughesJDPain assessment in dementia: evaluation of a point-of-care technological solutionJ Alzheimers Dis201760113715028800333
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Therapeutic Goods Administration eBusiness ServicesePAT Technologies Limited: information system software, application program2017 Available from: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/servlet/xmlmillr6?dbid=ebs/PublicHTML/pdfStore.nsf&docid=CD49D725FBC4131ECA2581610042344A&agid=(PrintDetailsPublic)&actionid=1Accessed August 31, 2017
Google Scholar
AteeMHotiKHughesJDPsychometric evaluation of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT): an innovative instrument for individuals with moderate to severe dementiaDement Geriatr Cogn Disord2018445–6256267
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MokkinkLBTerweeCBPatrickDLThe COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQual Life Res201019453954920169472
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ZwakhalenSMHamersJPAbu-SaadHHBergerMPPain in elderly people with severe dementia: a systematic review of behavioural pain assessment toolsBMC Geriatr20066316441889
PubMedGoogle Scholar
HerrKBjoroKDeckerSTools for assessment of pain in nonverbal older adults with dementia: a state-of-the-science reviewJ Pain Symptom Manage200631217019216488350
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BossuytPMReitsmaJBLinnetKMoonsKGBeyond diagnostic accuracy: the clinical utility of diagnostic testsClin Chem201258121636164322730450
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AbbeyJPillerNde BellisAThe Abbey Pain Scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementiaInt J Palliat Nurs200410161314966439
PubMedGoogle Scholar
GregersenMMelinASNygaardISNielsenCHBeedholm-EbsenMReliability of the Danish Abbey Pain Scale in severely demented and non-communicative older patientsInt J Palliat Nurs2016221048248827802089
PubMedGoogle Scholar
van HerkRvan DijkMBaarFPTibboelDde WitRObservation scales for pain assessment in older adults with cognitive impairments or communication difficultiesNurs Res2007561344317179872
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SalkindNJEncyclopedia of Research DesignThousand Oaks (CA)SAGE2010
Google Scholar
CronbachLJMeehlPEConstruct validity for psychological testsPsychol Bull195552428130213245896
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JormAFMackinnonAJHendersonASThe Psychogeriatric Assessment Scales: a multi-dimensional alternative to categorical diagnoses of dementia and depression in the elderlyPsychol Med19952534474607480426
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HanleyJAMcneilBJThe meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1982143129367063747
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GreinerMPfeifferDSmithRDPrinciples and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic testsPrev Vet Med2000451–2234110802332
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MitchellAJSensitivity × PPV is a recognized test called the clinical utility index (CUI+)Eur J Epidemiol201126325125221442261
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BossuytPMReitsmaJBBrunsDEThe STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaborationClin Chem200349171812507954
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MitchellAJHow do we know when a screening test is clinically useful?MitchellAJCoyneJCScreening for Depression in Clinical Practice: An Evidence-Based GuideOxfordOxford University Press201099112
Google Scholar
AchterbergWPPieperMJvan Dalen-KokAHPain management in patients with dementiaClin Interv Aging201381471148224204133
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WardenVHurleyACVolicerLDevelopment and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scaleJ Am Med Dir Assoc20034191512807591
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fuchs-LacelleSHadjistavropoulosTLixLPain assessment as intervention: a study of older adults with severe dementiaClin J Pain200824869770718806535
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MitchellAJYadegarfarMGillJStubbsBCase finding and screening clinical utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) for depression in primary care: a diagnostic meta-analysis of 40 studiesBJPsych Open20162212713827703765
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HancockPLarnerAJCornell Scale for Depression in Dementia: clinical utility in a memory clinicInt J Psychiatry Clin20151917174
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
van KootenJSmalbruggeMvan der WoudenJStekMLHertoghCEvaluation of a pain assessment procedure in long-term care residents with pain and dementiaJ Pain Symptom Manage201754572773128716614
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LichtnerVDowdingDClossSJThe relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementiaBMC Med Inform Decis Mak20151511126703244
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Clinimetric properties of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) for aged-care residents with moderate to severe dementia

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Clinimetric properties of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) for aged-care residents with moderate to severe dementia

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date