Spontaneous Fusion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review

References

• Oliver JD, Goncalves S, Kerezoudis P, et al. Comparison of outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine. 2018;43(7):E413–E422. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk RD, Verhagen WIM, Hosman AJF, Verbeek A, Bartels R. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy for single-level degenerative disk disease. Clin spine Surg. 2018;31(1):E50–E54. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan S-Z, Di J, Shen Y. Adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus the bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:2692–2700. doi:10.12659/MSM.905178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Spine. 2019;44(9):601–608. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD, et al. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):252–261. doi:10.3171/2017.5.SPINE16824
   Google Scholar
• Pointillart V, Castelain JE, Coudert P, Cawley DT, Gille O, Vital JM. Outcomes of the bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2018;42(4):851–857. doi:10.1007/s00264-017-3745-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(6):653–667. doi:10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264
   Google Scholar
• Zou S, Gao J, Xu B, Lu X, Han Y, Meng H. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):985–997. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Yuan W. Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(5):3109–3115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CC, Hao DJ, Huang DG, et al. Biomechanical analysis of a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate for cervical disc replacement. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CC, Liu P, Huang DG, Jiang YH, Feng H, Hao DJ. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis. Spine J. 2016;16(11):1384–1391. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):384–389. doi:10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010
   Google Scholar
• Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2006;31(24):2802–2806. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heary RF, Goldstein IM, Getto KM, Agarwal N. Solid radiographic fusion with a nonconstrained device 5 years after cervical arthroplasty. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):951–955. doi:10.3171/2014.8.SPINE14101
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(3):377–380. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0377
   Google Scholar
• Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):E194; discussion E194. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000163419.59635.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Jung TG, Kim HS, Jang JS, Lee SH. Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J. 2010;10(8):676–682. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SE, Chung CK, Jahng TA. Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):31–36. doi:10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11303
   Google Scholar
• Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):759–763. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000175856.31210.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisel HJ, Jurak L, Antinheimo J, et al. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(5):556–565. doi:10.3171/2016.3.SPINE15810
   Google Scholar
• Mehren C, Wuertz-Kozak K, Sauer D, Hitzl W, Pehlivanoglu T, Heider F. Implant design and the anchoring mechanism influence the incidence of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement at 2-year follow-up. Spine. 2019;44(21):1471–1480. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin KR, Pencle FJR, Mustafa LS, Mustafa MS, Quijada KA, Seale JA. Incidence of fusion across total disc replacement with heterotopic ossification: are ball and socket disk replacements fusing with and without radiographic evidence. Clin Spine Surg. 2019;32(10):E469–E473. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MMH, Ryu WHA, Casha S, DuPlessis S, Jacobs WB, Hurlbert RJ. Heterotopic ossification and radiographic adjacent-segment disease after cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2019;1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour T, Beaurain J, Huppert J, Dam-Hieu P, Bernard P, Steib JP. Clinical and radiological evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up: a prospective study of 384 patients. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(10):2371–2379. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-06069-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenke C, Scharf J, Schmieder K, Barth M. High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(2):141–146. doi:10.3171/2012.4.SPINE12223
   Google Scholar
• Tu TH, Wu JC, Huang WC, et al. Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(4):457–465. doi:10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10444
   Google Scholar
• Oh CH, Kim DY, Ji GY, et al. Cervical arthroplasty for moderate to severe disc degeneration: clinical and radiological assessments after a minimum follow-up of 18 months–Pfirrmann grade and cervical arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(4):1072–1079. doi:10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.1072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Kim KN, Yang MS, et al. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2010;35(16):1556–1561. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6526b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Oh J, Choi G, et al. The fate of heterotopic ossification associated with cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2014;39(25):2078–2083. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Shin DA, Kim KN, et al. The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1048–1054. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Bartels R, Donk R, et al. Does heterotopic ossification in cervical arthroplasty affect clinical outcome? World Neurosurg. 2019;131:e408–e414. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Wang Q, Liu H, Yang Y. Postoperative heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement is likely a reflection of the degeneration process. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e1063–e1068. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CK, Ryu KS. Are controversial issues in cervical total disc replacement resolved or unresolved?: A review of literature and recent updates. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(1):178–192. doi:10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou HH, Qu Y, Dong RP, Kang MY, Zhao JW. Does heterotopic ossification affect the outcomes of cervical total disc replacement? A meta-analysis. Spine. 2015;40(6):E332–E340. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar