Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Epidural Anesthesia: Technical Note and Initial Clinical Experience with One-Year Follow-Up

References

• Phillips FM, Slosar PJ, Youssef JA, et al. Lumbar spine fusion for chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: a systematic review. Spine. 2013;38(7):E409–422. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182877f11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao L, Zhao Q, Sun X, et al. Relationship between alterations of spinal/pelvic sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e156–e164. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Liu H, Ao S, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and preliminary clinical experience with 2-year follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:5806037. doi:10.1155/2018/5806037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630–641. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Chang PY, Grossman J. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(4):411–418. doi:10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, et al. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Trans Med. 2018;6(6):104. doi:10.21037/atm.2018.03.24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn Y, Youn MS, Heo DH. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(5):373–380. doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1610388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S166–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine. 2007;32(5):537–543. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256473.49791.f4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, et al. Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. EUR Spine J. 2010;19(2):316–324. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1191-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu GS, Henkelman E, Vaccaro AR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1792–1799. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3619-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(11):2265–2270. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ao S, Zheng W, Wu J, et al. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 76;2020:136–143. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine. 2008;33(9):931–939. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong L, Zhu Y, Tu G, A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(1):134–143. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3776-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 31;2016:86–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquot F, Gastambide D. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it? Int Orthop. 2013;37(8):1507–1510. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1905-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Erken HY, Bae J. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results of mean 46-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3731983. doi:10.1155/2017/3731983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Choi DJ. Biportal Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10(2):248–252. doi:10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantigan JW, Steffee A. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine. 1993;18(14):2106–2117. doi:10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo DH, Park CK. Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(4):E18. doi:10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley K, Smith M, Rampersaud Y. Microendoscopic approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus. 1999;7(5):e5. doi:10.3171/foc.1999.7.5.8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brusko GD, Wang MY. Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020;31(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2019.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong C, Li T, Kang H, et al. Early outcomes of 270-degree spinal canal decompression by using TESSYS-ISEE technique in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with disk herniation. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(1):78–86. doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5655-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Grossman J. Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(2):E13. doi:10.3171/2015.11.FOCUS15435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Kim H, Lee Y, et al. Uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interb\ody fusion with endoscopic disc drilling preparation technique for symptomatic foraminal stenosis secondary to severe collapsed disc space: a clinical and Computer tomographic study with technical note. Brain Sci. 2020;10(6). doi:10.3390/brainsci10060373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhou C, Wang C, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique note and comparison of early outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:549–558. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S298591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CW, Doerr TM, Luna IY, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using expandable technology: a clinical and radiographic analysis of 50 patients. World Neurosurgery. 2016;90:228–235. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):209–219. doi:10.3171/2013.10.SPINE13612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantell M, Cyriac M, Haines CM, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(1):32–38. doi:10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armocida D, Pesce A, Proietti L, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) using expandable cages: increased risk of late post-operative subsidence without a real improve of perioperative outcomes. A clinical mono-centric study. World Neurosurg. 2021;04:e1–e7.
   Google Scholar