Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

References

• Roberts NL, Mountjoy-Venning WC, Anjomshoa M, Banoub JA, Yasin YJ. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London, England). 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32279-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Chen R, Gu D, et al. Clinical comparison of full-endoscopic and microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of elderly lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 12-month follow-up. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1377–1384. doi:10.2147/jpr.S254275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubosaka M, Kaneyama S, Yano T, et al. The factors of deterioration in long-term clinical course of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after successful conservative treatment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):239. doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0947-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Q, Zhu B, Zhao W, Liang C, Hai B, Liu X. Full-endoscopic lumbar decompression versus open decompression and fusion surgery for the lumbar spinal stenosis: a 3-year follow-up study. J Pain Res. 2021;14:1331–1338. doi:10.2147/jpr.S309693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrokhi MR, Yadollahikhales G, Gholami M, Mousavi SR, Mesbahi AR, Asadi-Pooya AA. Clinical outcomes of posterolateral fusion vs. posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative instability. Pain Physician. 2018;21(4):383–406. doi:10.36076/ppj.2018.4.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:216–226. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(6):829–835. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(3):416–427. doi:10.3171/2015.2.spine14973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diwan S, Sayed D, Deer TR, Salomons A, Liang K. An algorithmic approach to treating lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidenced-based approach. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2019;20(Suppl 2):S23–s31. doi:10.1093/pm/pnz133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJJ, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(2):334–342. doi:10.31616/asj.2018.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman SG. Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: a case series report. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:157–166. doi:10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.04.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen J. Fully endoscopic lumbar laminectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under local anesthesia with conscious sedation: a case series. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e745–e750. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquot F, Gastambide D. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it? Int Orthop. 2013;37(8):1507–1510. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1905-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JC, Liu C, Hai Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report of seven cases with 12-month follow-up. Bio Med Res Int. 2019;2019:3091459. doi:10.1155/2019/3091459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coric D, Branch CL. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of symptomatic spinal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus. 1997;3(2):e5. doi:10.3171/foc.1997.3.2.11
   Google Scholar
• Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M. Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol. 2008;69(2):109–113. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2007.04.021
   Google Scholar
• Thomson S. Failed back surgery syndrome - definition, epidemiology and demographics. Br J Pain. 2013;7(1):56–59. doi:10.1177/2049463713479096
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalichman L, Carmeli E, Been E. The association between imaging parameters of the paraspinal muscles, spinal degeneration, and low back pain. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2562957. doi:10.1155/2017/2562957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranger TA, Cicuttini FM, Jensen TS, et al. Are the size and composition of the paraspinal muscles associated with low back pain? A systematic review. Spine J. 2017;17(11):1729–1748. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AB, Weiss EH, Khan AW, Omeis I, Verla T. Back muscle morphometry: effects on outcomes of spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:174–179. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn Y, Youn MS, Heo DH. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(5):373–380. doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1610388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:S1–S6. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S294–S301. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022ddc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Mao K, Qiang X. Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: a STROBE-compliant observational study. Medicine. 2017;96(37):e8011. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000008011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar