Interplay Between Innovation and Intersubjectivity: Therapists Perceptions of Phantom Motor Execution Therapy and Its Effect on Phantom Limb Pain

References

• Limakatso K, Bedwell GJ, Madden VJ, Parker R. The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(10 October):1–21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuffler DP. Coping with phantom limb pain. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(1):70–84. doi:10.1007/s12035-017-0718-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlenwein J, Diers M, Ernst J, Schulz F, Petzke F. Clinical updates on phantom limb pain. PAIN Reports. 2021;6(1):e888. doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000888
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Pino G, Piombino V, Carassiti M, Ortiz-Catalan M. Neurophysiological models of phantom limb pain: what can be learnt. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87(4):481–487. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15067-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs X, Flor H, Bekrater-Bodmann R. Psychological factors associated with phantom limb pain: a review of recent findings. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018. doi:10.1155/2018/5080123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limakatso K, Parker R. Treatment Recommendations for Phantom Limb Pain in People with Amputations: an Expert Consensus Delphi Study. PM R. 2021;13(11):1216–1226. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batsford S, Ryan CG, Martin DJ. Non-pharmacological conservative therapy for phantom limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(3):173–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins KL, Russell HG, Schumacher PJ, et al. A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(6):2168–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthie NS, Giordano NA, Jenerette CM, et al. Use and efficacy of virtual, augmented, or mixed reality technology for chronic pain: a systematic review. Pain Manag. 2022;12(7):859–878. doi:10.2217/pmt-2022-0030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan M, Sander N, Kristoffersen M, Håkansson B, Brånemark R. Treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) based on augmented reality and gaming controlled by myoelectric pattern recognition: a case study of a chronic PLP patient. Front Neurosci. 2014;8(8 FEB):1–7. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan M, Guðmundsdóttir R, Kristoffersen M, et al. Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for phantom limb pain: a single group, clinical trial in patients with chronic intractable phantom limb pain. Lancet. 2016;6736(16):56.
   Google Scholar
• Lendaro E, Hermansson L, Burger H, et al. Phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain: protocol of an international, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e021039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort T, Trost Z. Examining Affective-Motivational Dynamics and Behavioral Implications Within The Interpersonal Context of Pain. J Pain. 2017;18(10):1174–1183. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams LM, Turk DC. Central sensitization and the biopsychosocial approach to understanding pain. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2018;23(2):1–19. doi:10.1111/jabr.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan M. The Stochastic Entanglement and Phantom Motor Execution Hypotheses: a Theoretical Framework for the Origin and Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain. Front Neurol. 2018;9(1–16):65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon AM, Hargrove LJ, Lock BA, Kuiken TA. The Target Achievement Control Test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern recognition control of a multifunctional upper-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;23(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in Phantom Limbs Induced with Mirrors. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1996;263(1369):377–386. doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilch M, O’Hora D, Jennings C, et al. Perspective-taking influences attentional deployment towards facial expressions of pain: an eye-tracking study. Pain. 2020;161(6):1286–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: how contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016;24:65–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory, Res Pract. 1979;16(3):252–260. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05450-X
   Google Scholar
• Ardito RB, Rabellino D. Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychol. 2011;2(3):270. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1099–1110. doi:10.2522/ptj.20090245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Lee SW, Kielhofner G. Practitioners’ use of interpersonal modes within the therapeutic relationship: results from a nationwide study. OTJR Occup Particip Heal. 2011;31(1):6–14. doi:10.3928/15394492-20100521-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcombe L, De Leo D. Human-Computer Interaction in Digital Mental Health. Informatics. 2022;9(1). doi:10.3390/informatics9010014
   Google Scholar
• D’Alfonso S, Lederman R, Bucci S, Berry K. The digital therapeutic alliance and human-computer interaction. JMIR Ment Heal. 2020;7(12):e21895. doi:10.2196/21895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman R, D’Alfonso S. The digital therapeutic alliance: prospects and considerations. JMIR Ment Heal. 2021;8(7):e31385. doi:10.2196/31385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez A, Schwenk S, Schneck CD, Griffin RJ, Mishkind MC. Technology-Based Mental Health Treatment and the Impact on the Therapeutic Alliance. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(8):1–7. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1055-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards P, Simpson S, Bastiampillai T, Pietrabissa G, Castelnuovo G. The impact of technology on therapeutic alliance and engagement in psychotherapy: the therapist’s perspective. Clin Psychol. 2018;22(2):171–181. doi:10.1111/cp.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmann E, Köhnen M, Härter M, Liebherz S. Therapeutic alliance in technology-based interventions for the treatment of depression: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e17195. doi:10.2196/17195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374(2018):1–11. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061
   Google Scholar
• Burbank PM, Martins DC. Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: divergent or synergistic?: original article. Nurs Philos. 2010;11(1):25–41. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotland J. Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Lang Teach. 2012;5(9):9–16. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n9p9
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Int J Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995;5(2):147–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Determining Sample Size. Qual Health Res. 2000;10(1):3–5. doi:10.1177/104973200129118183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: how Many Interviews Are Enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furber C. Framework analysis: a method for analysing qualitative data. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;4(2):97–100. doi:10.12968/ajmw.2010.4.2.47612
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(117):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaço N, Wagland R, Alexis O, Gavin A, Glaser A, Watson EK. Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Qualitative Dyadic Data in Health Research. Qual Health Res. 2021;31(8):1555–1564. doi:10.1177/10497323211011599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer I, Orr C, Thielking M. Applying the framework method to qualitative psychological research: methodological overview and worked example. Qual Psychol. 2022;10(1):44–59. doi:10.1037/qup0000238
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241–251. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzoukas S. The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research: a necessary prerequisite for securing validity. J Res Nurs. 2005;10(3):279–295. doi:10.1177/174498710501000305
   Google Scholar
• Cope DG. Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(1). doi:10.7748/nr2009.07.16.4.40.c7160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin Holmes AG. Researcher Positionality - A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research - A New Researcher Guide. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2020;8(4):1–10. doi:10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
   Google Scholar
• Ryan-Nicholls KD, Will CI. Rigour in qualitative research: mechanisms for control. Nurse Res. 2009;16(3):70–85. doi:10.7748/nr2009.04.16.3.70.c6947
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–396. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton C, Casey D, Shaw D, Murphy K. Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Res. 2013;20(4):12–17. doi:10.7748/nr2013.03.20.4.12.e326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin HS, Jay M, Maness L, Zabar S, Kalet A. Health Literacy: an Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcome. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(9):1363–1368. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3329-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, Davis D, ed. Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Orji R, Vassileva J, Mandryk R. Towards an effective health interventions design: an extension of the health belief model. Online J Public Health Inform. 2012;4(3).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:565–590. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rief W, Hofmann SG, Nestoriuc Y. The Power of Expectation - Understanding the Placebo and Nocebo Phenomenon. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(4):1624–1637. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00121.x
   Google Scholar
• Richardson A. Individual Differences in Imaging: Their Measurement, Origins, and Consequences. Routledge; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier CSA. Training with virtual visual feedback to alleviate phantom limb pain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(6):587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAvinue LP, Robertson IH. Measuring motor imagery ability: a review. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2008;20(2):232–251. doi:10.1080/09541440701394624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcavinue LP, Robertson IH. Individual differences in response to phantom limb movement therapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(22–23):2186–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira VC, Ferreira ML, Pinto RZ, Filho RF, Refshauge K, Ferreira PH. Effectiveness of Training Clinicians’ Communication Skills on Patients’ Clinical Outcomes: a Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(8):601–616. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, Adams RD. The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2013;93(4):470–478. doi:10.2522/ptj.20120137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):477–489. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Lee SW, Kielhofner G, Ketkar M. Therapeutic use of self: a nationwide survey of Practitioners’ attitudes and experiences. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(2):198–207. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.2.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2311-3
   Google Scholar
• Nienhuis JB, Owen J, Valentine JC, et al. Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Res. 2018;28(4):593–605. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1204023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus TS, Silva IL. Toward an evidence-based patient-provider communication in rehabilitation: linking communication elements to better rehabilitation outcomes. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(4):315–328. doi:10.1177/0269215515585133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson D, Williams M, Butler D. Language and the pain experience. Physiother Res Int. 2009;14(1):56–65. doi:10.1002/pri
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lendaro E, Middleton A, Brown S, Ortiz-Catalan M. Out of the clinic, into the home: the in-home use of phantom motor execution aided by machine learning and augmented reality for the treatment of phantom limb pain. J Pain Res. 2020;13:195–209. doi:10.2147/JPR.S220160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon M, Hogan M, Durand H, et al. Designing an e-learning tool to support health practitioners caring for patients taking multiple medications. HRB Open Res. 2021;3:59. doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13110.2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma J, Hogan MJ, Eyre ELJ, Lander N, Barnett LM, Duncan MJ. Enhancing the implementation and sustainability of fundamental movement skill interventions in the UK and Ireland: lessons from collective intelligence engagement with stakeholders. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s12966-021-01214-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, et al. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit. 2019;45(3):247–257. doi:10.1136/medhum-2017-011398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward ME, De BA, Beirne D, et al. Using co-design to develop a collective leadership intervention for healthcare teams to improve safety culture. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1–17. doi:10.3390/ijerph15061182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey E, Hardeman W, Hankonen N, et al. Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions. Heal Psychol Behav Med. 2020;8(1):132–151. doi:10.1080/21642850.2020.1738935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar