Effects of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine on Hemodynamic Profiles and Block Characteristics Among Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

References

• Lyell DJ, Power M, Murtough K, et al. Surgical techniques at cesarean delivery: a US survey. Surg J. 2016;2(04):e119–e25. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1594247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson SJ, De Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization’s target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Med J Aust. 2017;206(4):181–185. doi:10.5694/mja16.00832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarekegn SM, Lieberman LS, Giedraitis V. Determinants of maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of the 2011 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Waltengus F. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13037-020-00236-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Sultan P. Regional anaesthesia for caesarean section: a choice of three techniques. Br J Hosp Med. 2009;70(10):605. doi:10.12968/hmed.2009.70.10.44637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlÖHR S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(8):909–921. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maayan-Metzger A, Schushan-Eisen I, Todris L, Etchin A, Kuint J. Maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section and short-term neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(1):56. e1–. e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shitemaw T, Jemal B, Mamo T, Akalu L. Incidence, and associated factors for hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section at Gandhi Memorial Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0236755. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee WDN. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2010;23(3):304–309. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e328337ffc6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakherpour A, Ghaem H, Fattahi Z, Zaree S. Maternal and anaesthesia-related risk factors and incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in elective caesarean section: a multinomial logistic regression. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(1):36. doi:10.4103/ija.IJA_416_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganelli MA, Popescu GK. Actions of bupivacaine, a widely used local anesthetic, on NMDA receptor responses. J Neuros. 2015;35(2):831–842. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3578-14.2015
   Google Scholar
• Sng B, Han N, Leong W, et al. Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(4):499–511. doi:10.1111/anae.14084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard JB. Cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: common mechanisms and strategies for prevention. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(1):252–256. doi:10.1097/00000539-200101000-00050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama AK, Goma HM, Hamid BMA. Fluid preloading versus ephedrine in the management of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a comparative study. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2016;9(1):72. doi:10.4103/1687-7934.178883
   Google Scholar
• Assen S, Jemal B, Tesfaye A. Effectiveness of leg elevation to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery in the resource-limited area: open randomized controlled Trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:1–8. doi:10.1155/2020/5014916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed K, Ishrat Z, Akhtar N, Ijaz B. Comparative study of intrathecal 0.5% isobaric versus 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in same volume and dose to assess the quality of spinal anaesthesia and haemodynamic changes occurring during cesarean section. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2014;8(2):407–410.
   Google Scholar
• Bano N, Firdous R. Effects of intrathecal hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine in elective caesarean section. J Univ Med Dent Coll. 2015;6(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Martin R, Frigon C, Chretien A, Tetrault J-P. Onset of spinal block is more rapid with isobaric than hyperbaric bupivacaine. Canad J Anesth. 2000;47(1):43–46. doi:10.1007/BF03020730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atashkhoei S, Abedini N, Pourfathi H, Znoz AB, Marandi PH. Baricity of bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2017;42(2):136. doi:10.1093/bja/86.3.372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ousley R, Egan C, Dowling K, Cyna A. Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(12):1356–1363. doi:10.1111/anae.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. Spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetrics: prevention and therapy. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58(Suppl 1):90. doi:10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aftab S, Ali H, Zafar S, Sheikh M, Sultan ST. Intrathecal isobaric versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective Caesarean section. Surgery. 2007;154:5.53.
   Google Scholar
• Upadya M, Neeta S, Manissery JJ, Kuriakose N, Singh RR. A randomized controlled study comparing intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture and isobaric bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in common urological procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(1):44–49. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.174813
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Critchley L, Morley A, Derrick J. The influence of baricity on the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5%. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(5):469–474. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00841.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helill SE, Sahile WA, Abdo RA, Wolde GD, Halil HM. The effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226030. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solakovic N. Level of sensory block and baricity of bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia. Med Arch. 2010;64(3):158.
   Google Scholar
• Saha N, Singh R, Mittal T. Comparison of intrathecal 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in LSCS surgeries – a randomized double-blind trial. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci. 2023;8(1):19–2.
   Google Scholar
• Sarvela PJ, Halonen PM, Korttila KT. Comparison of 9 mg of intrathecal plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine both with fentanyl for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(5):1257–1262. doi:10.1213/00000539-199911000-00033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava U, Kumar A, Gandhi N, et al. Hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine combined with fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia during caesarean delivery. Indian J Anaesth. 2004;48(1):44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Punshi GD, Afshan G. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(8):807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetzlaff JE, O’Hara J, Bell G, Grimm K, Yoon HJ. Influence of baricity on the outcome of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for lumbar spine surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1995;20(6):533–537.
   Google Scholar