Female genital mutilation and male circumcision: toward an autonomy-based ethical framework

References

• Rahman A, Toubia N. Female Genital Mutilation: A Practical Guide to Worldwide Laws and Policies: Zed Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Morris B. Science supports infant circumcision, so should skeptics. The Skeptic. 2013;Autumn:30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Unger RK, Crawford M. Commentary: Sex and gender: the troubled relationship between terms and concepts. Psychological Science. 1993;4(2):122–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich N, Barr M. Intersex surgery, female genital cutting, and the selective condemnation of cultural practices. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 2005;40:71–539.
   Google Scholar
• Dreger AD. “Ambiguous sex” – or ambivalent medicine? Ethical issues in the treatment of intersexuality. Hastings Center Report. 1998;28(3):24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester JD. Intersex(es) and informed consent: how physicians’ rhetoric constrains choice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2004;25(1):21–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parens E. Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality: JHU Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Carmack A, Notini L, Earp BD. Should surgery for hypospadias be performed before an age of consent? Journal of Sex Research. In press. Available online ahead of print at https://www.academia.edu/13117940/Should_surgery_for_hypospadias_be_performed_before_an_age_of_consent.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. Promoting Gender Equality. 2014. Available at http://www.unfpa.org/gender/practices2.htm#12.
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. United Nations Bans Female Genital Mutilation. 2012. Available at http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2012/12/united-nations-bans-female-genital-mutilation/.
   Google Scholar
• Earp, BD. Between moral relativism and moral hypocrisy: reframing the debate on “FGM.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. In press. Available online ahead of print at https://www.academia.edu/10197867/Between_moral_relativism_and_moral_hypocrisy_The_case_of_FGM.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink M, Tigchelaar J. Shaping genitals, shaping perceptions: a frame analysis of male and female circumcision. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 2012;30:417–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisheker JV. The completely unregulated practice of male circumcision: human rights’ abuse enshrined in law? New Male Studies. 2013;2(1):18–45.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon LM, Noll RC. Male versus female genital alteration: differences in legal, medical, and socioethical responses. Gender Medicine. 2007;4(2):89–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giami A, Perrey C, de Oliveira Mendonça AL, de Camargo KR. Hybrid forum or network? The social and political construction of an international ‘technical consultation’: male circumcision and HIV prevention. Global Public Health. 2015;10(5–6):589–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAP. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e746–e785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the Prevention of HIV Infection, STIs, and Other Health Outcomes. 2014. Available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=CDC-2014-0012-0003.
   Google Scholar
• CDC. Draft CDC Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the Prevention of HIV Infection, STIs, and Other Health Outcomes. 2014. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/MC-factsheet-508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention. 2015. Available at http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Do the benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks? A critique of the proposed CDC guidelines. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2014;3(18):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Davis DS. Male and female genital alteration: a collision course with the law. Health Matrix. 2001;11:487–687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU International. 1999;83(S1):34–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earp BD. Sex and circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics. 2015;15(2):43–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers W, Hoffer C, Wils J-P. Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2005;8(2):179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda JS, Darby R. A rose by any other name: symmetry and asymmetry in male and female genital cutting. In Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies Around Excision and Circumcision, ed. Zabus C. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. 2008;272–286.
   Google Scholar
• Bell K. Genital cutting and Western discourses on sexuality. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 2005;19(2):125–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RL, Johnson D, Burke N. Multiculturalism, medicine, and the limits of autonomy: the practice of female circumcision. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1994;3(3):431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Female Genital Mutilation. 2014. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Tobian AA, Gray RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011;306(13):1479–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank S, Brady M, Buerk E, et al. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor J. The child’s interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):421–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global Strategy to Stop Healthcare Providers from Performing Female Genital Mutilation. 2010. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_RHR_10.9_eng.pdf?ua=1.
   Google Scholar
• Renganathan A, Cartwright R, Cardozo L. Gynecological cosmetic surgery. Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;4(2):101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cold CJ, McGrath KA. Anatomy and histology of the penile and clitoral prepuce in primates. Male and Female Circumcision. New York: Springer. 1999;19–29.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell HE, Sanjeevan KV, Hutson JM. Anatomy of the clitoris. The Journal of Urology. 2005;174(4):1189–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L-M, Taghinejadi N, Creighton SM. An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e001908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. Female “Circumcision” in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change: Boulder: Lynn Reinner Publishers; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S. Female Circumcision and Clitoridectomy in the United States: A History of a Medical Treatment. University of Rochester Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly B, Foster C. Should female genital cosmetic surgery and genital piercing be regarded ethically and legally as female genital mutilation? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012;119(4):389–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon S, Wilkinson S. Female genital mutilation and cosmetic surgery: regulating non-therapeutic body modification. Bioethics. 1998;12(4):263–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacReady N. AAP retracts statement on controversial procedure. The Lancet. 2010;376(9734):15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady M. Female genital mutilation: complications and risk of HIV transmission. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 1999;13(12):709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Female genital mutilation (FGM) and male circumcision: Should there be a separate ethical discourse? Practical Ethics. University of Oxford. 2014. Available at https://www.academia.edu/8817976/Female_genital_mutilation_FGM_and_male_circumcision_Should_there_be_a_separate_ethical_discourse.
   Google Scholar
• Obermeyer CM. Female genital surgeries: the known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1999;13(1):79–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers C. Are breast implants better than female genital mutilation? Autonomy, gender equality and Nussbaum’s political liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2004;7(3):1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shell-Duncan B. The medicalization of female “circumcision”: harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice? Social Science and Medicine. 2001;52(7):1013–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. Female circumcision in Africa: dimensions of the practice and debates. In Female “Circumcision” in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change, ed. Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Toubia N. Female Genital Mutilation: A Call for Global Action. New York: Rainbow/Women Ink. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulcadir J, Ahmadu FS, Catania L, et al. Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa. Hastings Center Report. 2012;42(6):19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania L, Abdulcadir O, Puppo V, Verde JB, Abdulcadir J, Abdulcadir D. Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2007;4(6):1666–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsdotter S. Discourses on sexual pleasure after genital modifications: the fallacy of genital determinism (a response to J Steven Svoboda). Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):256–265.
   Google Scholar
• Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA. Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93(3):722–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg RC, Denison E, Fretheim A. Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies. Report from Kunnskapssenteret. 2010;13:3–77.
   Google Scholar
• Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2012;9(1):41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer C. The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: an update on the evidence. Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2005;7(5):443–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meston CM, Hull E, Levin RJ, Sipski M. Disorders of orgasm in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2004;1(1):66–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahmy A, El-Mouelhy MT, Ragab AR. Female genital mutilation/cutting and issues of sexuality in Egypt. Reproductive Health Matters. 2010;18(36):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick LB. Marked in Your Flesh: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gollaher DL. From ritual to science: the medical transformation of circumcision in America. Journal of Social History. 1994;28(1):5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor A. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. BJU International. 1996;77(2):291–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werker PM, Terng AS, Kon M. The prepuce free flap: dissection feasibility study and clinical application of a super-thin new flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1998;102(4):1075–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD, Darby R. Does science support infant circumcision? The Skeptic. 2015;25(3):23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Scott S. The anatomy and physiology of the human prepuce. Male and Female Circumcision. New York: Springer. 1999;9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch M, Lindholm M, Grønbæk M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;40(5):1367–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH. Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41(1):310–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, M. Author’s Response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41(1):312–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction? – A systematic review. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(11):2644–2657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(12):2847–2864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Addressing polarization in science. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015;41:782–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. How can journal editors fight bias in polarized scientific communities? Journal of Medical Ethics Blog. 2015. Available at http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2015/04/30/how-can-journal-editors-fight-bias-in-polarized-scientific-communities/.
   Google Scholar
• Aberson C. Interpreting null results: Improving presentation and conclusions with confidence intervals. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis. 2002;1(3):36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi SA, Naqvi S, Hussain M, Hasan A. Religious circumcision: a Muslim view. BJU International. 1999;83(S1):13–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in the United States. Pediatrics. 1998;101(6):e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DS. Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):456–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounder DJ. Ritual mutilation: subincision of the penis among Australian Aborigines. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 1983;4(3):227–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis J. Heteronormativity and the deflection of male same-sex attraction among the Pitjantjatjara people of Australia’s Western Desert. Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2003;5(2):137–151.
   Google Scholar
• Anike U, Govender I, Ndimande JV, Tumbo J. Complications of traditional circumcision amongst young Xhosa males seen at St Lucy’s Hospital, Tsolo, Eastern Cape, South Africa: original research. African Primary Health Care and Family Medicine. 2013;5(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez L. South Africa: over half a million initiates maimed under the knife. All Africa. 2014. Available at http://allafrica.com/stories/201406251112.html.
   Google Scholar
• Maseko N. When circumcision can mean death in South Africa. BBC News Africa. 2013. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-23378694.
   Google Scholar
• Checketts R. Response to freedom of information request, FOI/0742. Birmingham Children’s Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust. 2012. Available at http://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/foi-bch-response-received-260612.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DeLaet DL. Framing male circumcision as a human rights issue? Contributions to the debate over the universality of human rights. Journal of Human Rights. 2009;8(4):405–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Boys and girls alike. Aeon Magazine. 2015. Available at http://aeon.co/magazine/philosophy/male-and-female-circumcision-are-equally-wrong/.
   Google Scholar
• Androus ZT. The United States, FGM, and Global Rights to Bodily Integrity. Paper presented at The Rothermere American Institute Conference: The United States and Global Human Rights. November, 2004. Oxford University. Available at http://www.zacharyandrous.com/The%20US%20FGM%20and%20Global%20HR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Garenne M, Giami A, Perrey C. Male circumcision and HIV control in Africa: questioning scientific evidence and decision making process. In Global Health in Africa: Historical Perspectives on Disease Control, ed. Giles-Vernick T, Webb JLA Jr. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. 2013:185–210.
   Google Scholar
• Earp BD. The ethics of infant male circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):418–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch M, Aigrain Y, Barauskas V, et al. Cultural bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):796–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda JS, Van Howe RS. Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):434–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber ST. The Circular Cut: Problematizing the Longevity of Civilization’s Most Aggressively Defended Amputation. Wesleyan University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann W. Expert statement: Dr med. Wolfram Hartmann, President of “Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte” [German Pediatric Society] for the hearing on the 26th of November 2012 concerning the drafting of a federal government bill. Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte (BVKJ). 2012. German original available at http://www.kinderaerzte-im-netz.de/bvkj/kinpopup/psfile/pdf/70/121126_Ste50aa5e211e6a6.pdf; English translation available at: http://www.intactamerica.org/german_pediatrics_statement.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson C. Re: AAP circumcision Policy Statement and Technical Report. Pediatrics. 2012;E-letter. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.full/reply#pediatrics_el_54322.
   Google Scholar
• Booker CS. Re: Technical report on male circumcision. Pediatrics. 202;E-letter. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.full/reply#pediatrics_el_54322.
   Google Scholar
• Bewley S, Stranjord S. Being honest about medical involvement that contravenes “first of all, do no harm.” Pediatrics. 2012;E-letter. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/585.short/reply#pediatrics_el_55563.
   Google Scholar
• Guest C. Revised male infant circumcision policy: a disservice to Americans. Pediatrics. 2012;E-letter. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/585.short/reply#pediatrics_el_55563.
   Google Scholar
• Androus ZT. Critiquing circumcision: in search of a new paradigm for conceptualizing genital modification. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):266–280.
   Google Scholar
• Earp BD. The AAP report on circumcision: bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine. Practical Ethics. University of Oxford. 2012. Available at http://blog practicalethics ox ac uk/2012/08/the-aap-report-on-circumcision-bad-science-bad-ethics-bad-medicine/.
   Google Scholar
• Wettergren B, Jodal U, Jonasson G. Epidemiology of bacteriuria during the first year of life. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. 1985;74:925–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar M, Benatar D. Between prophylaxis and child abuse: the ethics of neonatal male circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics. 2003;3(2):35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2005;90(8):853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallings RY, Karugendo E. Female circumcision and HIV infection in Tanzania: for better or for worse. Third International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Rio de Janeiro. 2005:25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kinuthia RG. The Association Between Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and the Risk of HIV/AIDS in Kenyan Girls and Women (15–49 Years). Georgia State University. 2010. Available at http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses.
   Google Scholar
• Van Howe RS. A CDC-Requested, Evidence-Based Critique of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014 Draft on Male Circumcision: How Ideology and Selective Science Lead to Superficial, Culturally-Biased Recommendations by the CDC. 2015. Available at https://www.academia.edu/10553782/A_CDC-requested_Evidence-based_Critique_of_the_Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention_2014_Draft_on_Male_Circumcision_How_Ideology_and_Selective_Science_Lead_to_Superficial_Culturally-biased_Recommendations_by_the_CDC.
   Google Scholar
• de Witte L, Nabatov A, Pion M, et al. Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells. Nature Medicine. 2007;13(3):367–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JNT, Morris, HB. Langerhans’ cells and lymphocyte subsets in the female genita1 tract. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1985;92(9):974–982.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell JC, Orubuloye IO, Caldwell P. Male and female circumcision in Africa from a regional to a specific Nigerian examination. Social Science and Medicine. 1997;44(8):1181–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum MC. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M. Male genital mutilation: beyond the tolerable? Ethnicities. 2010;10(2):181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox M, Thomson M. Foreskin is a feminist issue. Australian Feminist Studies. 2009;24(60):195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadu F. Rites and wrongs: an insider/outsider reflects on power and excision. In Female “Circumcision” in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change. 2000:283–312.
   Google Scholar
• Manderson L. Local rites and body politics: tensions between cultural diversity and human rights. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2004;6(2):285–307.
   Google Scholar
• Wade L. Learning from “Female Genital Mutilation”: lessons from 30 years of academic discourse. Ethnicities. 2012;12(1):26–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James SM, Robertson CC. Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing US Polemics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby V. On the cutting edge: feminism and clitoridectomy. Australian Feminist Studies. 1987;2(5):35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheed F. Constructing identities: culture, women’s agency and the Muslim world. International Social Science Journal. 1999;51(159):61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Dustin M. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the UK: challenging the inconsistencies. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2010;17(1):7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax D. Female Genital Cutting, Sexuality, and Anti-FGC Advocacy. University of Nevada: Las Vegas. 2006. Available at https://www.academia.edu/1622829/Female_Genital_Cutting_Sexuality_and_Anti-FGC_Advocacy.
   Google Scholar
• Harryman GL. An analysis of the accuracy of the presentation of the human penis in anatomical source materials. In Flesh and Blood: Perspectives on the Problem of Circumcision in Contemporary Society, ed. Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 2004;17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dekkers W. Routine (non-religious) neonatal circumcision and bodily integrity: a transatlantic dialogue. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2009;19(2):125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Autonomy is not the only game in town … but it is the best game in town. Protecting Children’s Rights in Europe: Recent Developments (Proceedings). 2013. Available at https://www.academia.edu/5790397/Autonomy_is_not_the_only_game_in_town_..._but_it_is_the_best_game_in_town.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges F. A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilation in the United States. In Sexual Mutilations, ed. Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF. New York: Springer. 1997;17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen SJ. Why aren’t Jewish women circumcised? Gender and History. 1997;9(3):560–578.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen SJ. Why Aren’t Jewish Women Circumcised? Gender and Covenant in Judaism. Oakland: University of California Press. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Benatar D. Why do Jewish egalitarians not circumcise their daughters? Jewish Affairs. 2008;Chanukah:21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel MS. The kindest un-cut. Tikkun. 2001;16(3):43–48. Available at http://www.cirp.org/pages/cultural/kimmel1/.
   Google Scholar
• Aggleton P. “Just a snip”?: a social history of male circumcision. Reproductive Health Matters. 2007;15(29):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot-Klein H. Prisoners of Ritual: An Odyssey into Female Genital Circumcision in Africa. Philadelphia: Haworth Press, Inc.; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle GJ, Goldman R, Svoboda JS, Fernandez E. Male circumcision: pain, trauma and psychosexual sequelae. Journal of Health Psychology. 2002;7(3):329–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby R. A Surgical Temptation: The Demonization of the Foreskin and the Rise of Circumcision in Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Glass M. Forced circumcision of men (abridged). Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;40(8):567–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlberg BM, Njoroge KM. ‘Not men enough to rule!’: politicization of ethnicities and forcible circumcision of Luo men during the postelection violence in Kenya. Ethnicity and Health. 2013;18(5):454–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillius A. Indonesian Christians forced into Islamic faith. The Telegraph. February 5, 2001. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/indonesia/1321246/Indonesian-Christians-forced-into-Islamic-faith.html.
   Google Scholar
• Plaskow J. Blaming Jews for inventing patriarchy. Lilith. 1980;7:11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2011;140:w13137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman DL. The Seattle compromise: multicultural sensitivity and Americanization. Duke Law Journal. 1998:717–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel R, Putzke H. After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):444–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda JS, Adler P, Van Howe RS. Circumcision is unethical and unlawful. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludbrook R. The child’s right to bodily integrity. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 1995;7(2):123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons B. Male infant circumcision as a ‘HIV vaccine’. Public Health Ethics. 2013;6(1):90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson L. Unspeakable Mutilations: Circumcised Men Speak Out. Ashburton, NZ. 2014. Available at http://www.amazon.com/Unspeakable-Mutilations-Circumcised-Men-Speak-ebook/dp/B00L5FPF2C/ref=pd_ybh_1.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs AJ, Arora KS. Ritual male infant circumcision and human rights. American Journal of Bioethics. 2015;15(2):30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslen H, Earp BD, Kadosh RC, Savulescu J. Brain stimulation for treatment and enhancement in children: an ethical analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8(953):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda JS. Promoting genital autonomy by exploring commonalities between male, female, intersex, and cosmetic female genital cutting. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):237–255.
   Google Scholar
• Plotkin S, Gerber JS, Offit PA. Vaccines and autism: a tale of shifting hypotheses. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2009;48(4):456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby R. The mysterious disappearance of the object of inquiry: Jacobs and Arora’s defense of circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics. 2015;15(5):70–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby R. The child’s right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(7):463–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutson JM. Circumcision: a surgeon’s perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(3):238–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby R. Risks, benefits, complications and harms: Neglected factors in the current debate on non-therapeutic circumcision. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2015;25(1):1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason C. Exorcising excision: medico-legal issues arising from male and female genital surgery in Australia. Journal of Law and Medicine. 2001;9(1):58–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earp BD, Sandberg A, Savulescu J. Brave new love: The threat of high-tech “conversion” therapy and the bio-oppression of sexual minorities. AJOB Neuroscience. 2014;5(1):4–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earp BD, Wudarczyk OA, Sandberg A, Savulescu J. If I could just stop loving you: Anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical breakup. American Journal of Bioethics. 2013;13(11):3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Things I have learned (so far) about how to do practical ethics. Practical Ethics. University of Oxford. 2014. Available at http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/03/things-ive-learned-so-far-about-how-to-do-practical-ethics/.
   Google Scholar
• Earp BD. Prostitution, harm, and disability: Should only people with disabilities be allowed to pay for sex? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015;E-letter. Available at https://www.academia.edu/13252176/Prostitution_harm_and_disability_Should_only_people_with_disabilities_be_allowed_to_pay_for_sex.
   Google Scholar