References
- BalagueFMannionAFPelliseFCedraschiCNon-specific low back painLancet2012379981448249121982256
- ParthanAEvansCJLeKChronic low back pain: epidemiology, economic burden and patient-reported outcomes in the USAExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res20066335936920528528
- NiuGYangJWangRDangSWuEXGuoYMR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitationAJNR Am J Neuroradiol20113291617162321799044
- HicksGEMoroneNWeinerDKDegenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlatesSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200934121301130619455005
- DePalmaMJKetchumJMSaulloTWhat is the source of chronic low back pain and does age play a role?Pain Med201112222423321266006
- ChouRAtlasSJStanosSPRosenquistRWNonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guidelineSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200934101078109319363456
- CareyTSGarrettJMJackmanAMBeyond the good prognosis. Examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back painSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200025111512010647169
- Von KorffMStudying the natural history of back painSpine (Phila Pa 1976)19941918 Suppl2041S2046S7801181
- SmithSEDardenBVRhyneALWoodKEOutcome of unoperated discogram-positive low back painSpine (Phila Pa 1976)1995201819972000 discussion 2000–19918578375
- DeyoRAGrayDTKreuterWMirzaSMartinBIUnited States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditionsSpine (Phila Pa 1976)2005301214411445 discussion 1446–144715959375
- TaliaAJWongMLLauHCKayeAHComparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusionJ Clin Neuroscience201522243251
- RihnJAPatelRMakdaJComplications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionSpine J20099862362919482519
- PengCWYueWMPohSYYeoWTanSBClinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200934131385138919478658
- OxlandTRGrantJPDvorakMFFisherCGEffects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodiesSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200328877177712698119
- LoweTGHashimSWilsonLAA biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody supportSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200429212389239415507800
- TanJSBaileyCSDvorakMFFisherCGOxlandTRInterbody device shape and size are important to strengthen the vertebra-implant interfaceSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200530663864415770178
- VoronovLIConti MicaMCarandangGHaveyRMWojewnikBPatwardhanAGBiomechanics of expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage deployed through transforaminal approachPresented at: the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves (Spine Summit 2016)March 19; 2016Orlando, FL
- CopayAGGlassmanSDSubachBRSchulerBSCarreonLYMinimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scalesSpine J20088696897418201937
- HouYYuanWInfluences of disc degeneration and bone mineral density on the structural properties of lumbar end platesSpine J201212324925622366078
- FukutaSMiyamotoKHosoeHShimizuKKidney-type intervertebral spacers should be located anteriorly in cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analyses of risk factors for spacer subsidence for a minimum of 2 yearsJ Spinal Disord Tech201124318919520634726