Gains in health utility associated with urinary catheter innovations

References

• PilloniSKrhutJMairDMadersbacherHKesslerTMIntermittent catheterisation in older people: a valuable alternative to indwelling catheter?Age Aging20053415760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroenJPannekJCastro DiazDSummary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-UrologyEur Urol201669232433326304502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Clinical Guideline CentreInfection: Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Primary and Community Care: Partial Update of NICE Clinical Guideline 2NICE Clinical Guidelines No. 139LondonRoyal College of Physicians2012
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)Healthcare-Associated Infections: Prevention and Control in Primary and Community Care2012 Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG139Accessed May 1, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Chartier-KastlerEAmarencoGLindboLA prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterizationJ Urol2013190394294723587630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PinderBLloydAJDevelopment of a patient-reported outcome measure focusing on intermittent catheter-related quality of life.Int J Phys Med Rehabil20131155
   Google Scholar
• MallowEBFoxMAPhthalates and critically ill neonates: device-related exposures and non-endocrine toxic risksJ Perinatol2014341289289725357096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TestaiEHartemannPRastogiSCMs Scientific Committee SCENIHRThe safety of medical devices containing DEHP plasticized PVC or other plasticizers on neonates and other groups possibly at risk (2015 update)Regul Toxicol Pharmacol20167620921026854686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohanssonKGreisGJohanssonBEvaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover studyScand J Urol2013471333722762536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhSJKuJHLimSHJeonHGSonHEffect of a “centralized intensive education system” for clean intermittent self-catheterization in patients with voiding dysfunction who start catheterization for the first timeInt J Urol200613790590916882053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrummondMSculpherMTorranceGO’BrianBStoddartGMethods for Economic Evaluation of Health Care ProgramsOxfordOxford University Press2005
   Google Scholar
• BrennanVKDixonSIncorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studiesPharmacoeconomics201331867769123771494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DanielsNPortenyTUrritiaJExpandedHTAenhancing fairness and legitimacyInt J Health Policy Manag20165113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilkinsonGDrummondMAlternative approaches for assessing the socioeconomic benefits of medical devices: a systematic reviewExpert Rev Med Devices201512562964826305841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PinderBLloydANafeesBElkinEPMarleyJPatient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-cathetersPatient Prefer Adherence20159938138825834407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RidderstråleMEvansLMJensenHHEstimating the impact of changes in HbA1c, body weight and insulin injection regimen on health related quality-of-life: a time trade off studyHealth Qual Life Outcomes2016141326801908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwinburnPShinglerSAcasterSLloydABonthapallyVHealth utilities in relation to treatment response and adverse events in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphomaLeuk Lymphoma20155661839184525284490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatzaLSStewartKDDaviesEWHellmundRPolonskyWHKerrDHealth state utilities associated with glucose monitoring devicesValue Health201720350751128292497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatzaLSBoyeKSFeenyDHThe time horizon matters: results of an exploratory study varying the timeframe in time trade-off and standard gamble utility elicitationEur J Health Econ201617897999026611792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 20132013 Available from: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9Accessed January 18, 2018
   Google Scholar
• CADTHGuidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada20174th Edition Available from: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines_for_the_economic_evaluation_of_health_technologies_canada_4th_ed.pdfAccessed May 22, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory CommitteeGuidelines for Preparing A Submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC Guidelines), Version 502016 Available from: https://pbac.pbs.gov.au/content/information/files/pbac-guidelines-version-5.pdfAccessed January 18, 2018
   Google Scholar
• WHOLife Tables for WHO member states2014 Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/life_tables/en/Accessed October 1, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Agency MaHPRDEHP phthalates in medical devices2015 Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dehp-phthalates-in-medical-devices/dehp-phthalates-in-medical-devicesAccessed May 1, 2018
   Google Scholar
• WoodwardSRewMPatients’ quality of life and clean intermittent self-catheterizationBr J Nurs200312181066107414581839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VahrSCobussen-BoekhorstHEikenboomJEvidence Based Guidelines for Best Practice in Urological Health Care. Catheterisation: Urethral Intermittent in Adults. Dilatation, Urethral Intermittent in AdultsArnhemDrukkerij Gelderland2013
   Google Scholar
• BrazierJRatcliffeJSalomanJTsuchiyaAMeasuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic EvaluationOxfordOxford University Press2016
   Google Scholar
• HaywoodKLGarrattAMLallRSmithJFLambSEEuroQol EQ-5D and condition-specific measures of health outcome in women with urinary incontinence: reliability, validity and responsivenessQual Life Res200817347548318274881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LesenEBjorholtIIngelgardAOlsonFJExploration and preferential ranking of patient benefits of medical devices: a new and generic instrument for health economic assessmentsInt J Technol Assess Health Care201733446347129065937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AttemaAEEdelaar-PeetersYVersteeghMMStolkEATime trade-off: one methodology, different methodsEur J Health Econ201314Suppl 1S53S6423900665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NettenABurgePMalleyJOutcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measureHealth Technol Assess201216161166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeasgoodTBrazierJMukuriaCRowenDA Conceptual Comparison of Well-Being Measures Used in the UKSheffieldPolicy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Interventions (EEPRU)2014
   Google Scholar
• EuroQol Research Foundation“Extending the QALY” project collaboration with NICE Published62017 Available from: https://euroqol.org/extending-the-qaly-project-collaboration-with-nice/Accessed January 18, 2018
   Google Scholar