The Impact of Age on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

References

• Schönström N, Lindahl S, Willén J, Hansson T. Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:115–121. doi:10.1002/jor.1100070116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy RM, Deer TR. Systematic safety review and meta-analysis of procedural experience using percutaneous access to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Med. 2012;13:1554–1561. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01504.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, et al. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:783–788. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1103–1108. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9:545–550. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deer TR, Kapural L. New image-guided ultra-minimally invasive lumbar decompression method: the mild procedure. Pain Physician. 2010;13:35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LL. A double-blind, randomized, prospective study of epidural steroid injection vs. the mild® procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Pract. 2012;12:333–341. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00518.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deer TR, Kim CK, Bowman RG 2nd, Ranson MT, Yee BS. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication. Pain Physician. 2012;15:451–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekhail N, Vallejo R, Coleman MH, Benyamin RM. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis. Pain Pract. 2012;12:184–193. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00481.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekhail N, Costandi S, Abraham B, Samuel SW. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression. Pain Pract. 2012;12:417–425. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats PS, Chafin TB, Golovac S, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: 2-year results of MiDAS ENCORE. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:789–794. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopko BW. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression for LSS: two-year outcomes. Clin J Pain. 2013;29:939–943. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827fb803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deer TR, Grider JS, Pope JE, et al. The MIST guidelines: the lumbar spinal stenosis consensus group guidelines for minimally invasive spine treatment. Pain Pract. 2019;19:250–274. doi:10.1111/papr.12744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59:974. doi:10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause SJ. The pain disability index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1987;68:438–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait RC, Chibnall NT, Krause S. The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–182. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(90)90068-O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8:141–144. doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I. mild® is an effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: MiDAS ENCORE randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2016;19:229–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:12–20. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0464-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33(1):90–94. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331–1334. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–158. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silverstri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:283–291. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:818–825. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0708097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson T, Suzuki N, Hebelka H, Gaulitz A. The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:679–686. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0919-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J-H, Chiang Y-H, Chen -C-C. Lumbar radiculopathy and its neurobiological basis. World J Anesthesiol. 2014;3:162–173. doi:10.5313/wja.v3.i2.162
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis. World J Orthop. 2014;5:134–145. doi:10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.134
   Google Scholar
• Arbit E, Pannullo S. Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:137–143. doi:10.1097/00003086-200103000-00016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagley C, MacAllister M, Dosselman L, Moreno J, Aoun S, El Ahmadieh T. Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis. F1000Res. 2019;8:137. doi:10.12688/f1000research.16082.1
   Google Scholar
• Hansraj KK, Cammisa FP Jr, O’Leary PF, et al. Decompressive surgery for typical lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:10–17. doi:10.1097/00003086-200103000-00003
   Google Scholar
• Hee HT, Wong HK. The long-term results of surgical treatment for spinal stenosis in the elderly. Singapore Med J. 2003;44:175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Athiviraham A, Yen D. Is spinal stenosis better treated surgically or nonsurgically? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:90–93. doi:10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803799a9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athiviraham A, Wali ZA, Yen D. Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2011;11:613–617. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeh BL, Costandi S, Dalton JE, Ghosh R, Yousef H, Mekhail N. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients. Pain Pract. 2015;15:107–116. doi:10.1111/papr.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar