Validation of Omron HBP-1100-E Professional Blood Pressure Measuring Device According to the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Protocol: The PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS)

References

• Bilo G, Sala O, Perego C, et al. Impact of cuff positioning on blood pressure measurement accuracy: may a specially designed cuff make a difference? Hypertens Res. 2017;40(6):573. doi:10.1038/hr.2016.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Alpert B, Mieke S, et al. A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: association for the advancement of medical instrumentation/European society of hypertension/International organization for standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) collaboration statement. Hypertension. 2018;71(3):368–374. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi MD, Ayah R, Njau EK, et al. Prevalence of hypertension and associated cardiovascular risk factors in an urban slum in Nairobi, Kenya: a population-based survey. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1177. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SH, Park YS. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Press Monit. 2019;24(6):265–276. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Lei L, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European society of hypertension international protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2019;24:203–207. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahine MN, Topouchian J, Zelveian P, et al. Validation of BP devices QardioArm((R)) in the general population and Omron M6 Comfort((R)) in type II diabetic patients according to the European society of hypertension international protocol (ESH-IP). Med Devices. 2018;11:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, et al. European society of hypertension international protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(1):23–38. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360e98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Atkins N, O’Brien E. European society of hypertension international protocol for the validation of blood pressure monitors: a critical review of its application and rationale for revision. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(1):39–48. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360eaf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert BS, Sarkis J, Dart RA, et al. Future use of the European society of hypertension international protocol for validation of automated sphygmomanometers. Blood Press Monit. 2019;24(4):161–162. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingji C, Onakpoya IJ, Heneghan CJ, Ward AM. Assessing agreement of blood pressure-measuring devices in Tibetan areas of China: a systematic review. Heart Asia. 2016;8(2):46–51. doi:10.1136/heartasia-2016-010798
   Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Williams SM, Brown DD, Laurson KR. Concurrent validation of the actigraph gt3x+, polar active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015;33(10):991–1000. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.981848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topouchian J, Hakobyan Z, Asmar J, Gurgenian S, Zelveian P, Asmar R. clinical accuracy of the Omron M3 comfort® and the Omron evolv® for self-blood pressure measurements in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia–validation according to the universal standard protocol. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018;14:189. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S165524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipovský J, Seidlerová J, Kratochvíl Z, Karnosová P, Hronová M, Mayer O. Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Blood Press. 2016;25(4):228–234. doi:10.3109/08037051.2015.1134086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beime B, Kruger R, Hammel G, Bramlage P, Deutsch C. Validation of the Microlife BP A3 PC upper arm blood pressure monitor in patients with diabetes mellitus according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2018;23(1):52–57. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M. ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1: a new approach to device standards. Biomed Instrum Tech. 2006;40(3):246–247. doi:10.2345/i0899-8205-40-3-246.1
   Google Scholar
• Mansour-Ghanaei F, Joukar F, Naghipour MR, et al. The PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS). Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM. 2019;22(1):39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eghtesad S, Mohammadi Z, Shayanrad A, et al. The PERSIAN cohort: providing the evidence needed for healthcare reform. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(11):691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poustchi H, Eghtesad S, Kamangar F, et al. Prospective epidemiological research studies in Iran (the PERSIAN cohort study): rationale, objectives, and design. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;187(4):647–655. doi:10.1093/aje/kwx314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello NA, Woolley JJ, Cleary KL, et al. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement devices in pregnancy: a systematic review of validation studies. Hypertension. 2018;71(2):326–335. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705 IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: the Arsakion school study. Blood Press Monit. 2006;11(4):229–234. doi:10.1097/01.mbp.0000209074.38331.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odagiri T, Morita T, Yamauchi T, Imai K, Tei Y, Inoue S. Convenient measurement of systolic pressure: the reliability and validity of manual radial pulse pressure measurement. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(11):1226–1230. doi:10.1089/jpm.2013.0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing S, Chen K, Hou H, et al. Validation of the Microlife BP A200 comfort and W2 slim automated blood pressure monitors in a general adult population according to the European society of hypertension and the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 protocols. Blood Press Monit. 2016;21(2):118–123. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She J, Guan X, Liu Y, Xiang H. Validation of the RisingSun RS‐651 blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in adults according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060‐2: 2013 standard. J Clin Hypertens. 2016;18(12):1279–1283. doi:10.1111/jch.12859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran K, Potts J, Purkiss S, et al. Validation of an automated office blood pressure machine in pregnant women according to the AAMI 2013/ISO protocol. Hypertension. 2018;72(6):e91–e94. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien E, Stergiou G, Palatini P, et al. Validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices: the impact of the European society of hypertension international protocol and the development of a universal standard. Blood Press Monit. 2019;24(4):163–166. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzan M, Slotki I, Shavit L. More accurate systolic blood pressure measurement is required for improved hypertension management: a perspective. Med Devices. 2017;10:157–163.
   Google Scholar