127
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Usability of Norm Values on Results from a Simulator Device and Cognitive Tests in Traffic Medicine

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 59-70 | Published online: 10 Mar 2022

References

  • Chihuri S, Mielenz TJ, DiMaggio CJ, et al. Driving cessation and health outcomes in older adults. J Am Ger Soc. 2016;64(2):332–341. doi:10.1111/jgs.13931
  • Ortoleva C, Brugger C, Van der Linden M, Walder B. Prediction of driving capacity after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(4):302–313. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182236299
  • Classen S, Levy C, McCarthy D, Mann WC, Lanford D, Waid-Ebbs JK. Traumatic brain injury and driving assessment: an evidence-based literature review. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;64(5):580–591. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.5.580
  • Larsson H, Lundberg C, Falkmer T, Johansson K. A Swedish survey of occupational therapists’ involvement and performance in driving assessments. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(4):215–220. doi:10.1080/11038120601110983
  • Schultheis M, Whipple E. Driving after traumatic brain injury: evaluation and rehabilitation interventions. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014;2(3):176–183. doi:10.1007/s40141-014-0055-0
  • Samuelsson K, Tropp M, Lundqvist A, Wressle E. Development, concurrent validity and internal consistency of a simulator tool for assessing continued car driving after a brain injury/disease. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(9):544–552. doi:10.1177/0308022619836935
  • Samuelsson K, Wressle E. Fitness to drive after acquired brain injury: results from patient cognitive screening and on-road assessment compared with age-adjusted norm values. Scand J Psychol. 2021;63(1):55–63. doi:10.1111/sjop.12774
  • Patomella A-H, Tham K, Johansson K, Kottorp A. P-drive on-road: internal scale validity and reliability of an assessment of on-road driving performance in people with neurological disorders. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(1):86–93. doi:10.3109/11038120903071776
  • Murman DL. The impact of age on cognition. Semin Hear. 2015;36(3):111–121. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555115
  • Jeter K. Examining the role of cognition in driving: comparisons between driver groups and the development of the Maynooth on-road driving assessment [Master’s thesis]. Ireland: National University of Ireland, Maynooth; 2016.
  • Roca J, Castro C, López-Ramón M, et al. Measuring vigilance while assessing the functioning of the three attentional networks: the ANTI-vigilance task. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;198(2):312–324. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.014
  • Asimakopulos J, Boychuck Z, Sondergaard D, et al. Assessing executive function in relation to fitness to drive: a review of tools and their ability to predict safe driving. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59(6):402–427. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00963.x
  • Groeger JA. Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 2000.
  • Visual Awareness Research Group. UFOV User’s Guide Version 6.1.4. Birmingham, AL: Visual Awareness; 2009.
  • Marshall SC, Molnar F, Man-Son-Hing M, et al. Predictors of driving ability following stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(1):98–114. doi:10.1310/tsr1401-98
  • Tombaugh TN. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–214. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8
  • Lundberg C. Manual for the Nordic Stroke Driver Assessment (Norsdsa). Blidö, Sweden: NorSDSA Produktion Görel Caneman and Catarina Lundberg; 2003. Swedish.
  • Hird M, Egeto P, Fischer C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of on-road simulator and cognitive driving assessment in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(2):713–729. doi:10.3233/JAD-160276
  • Matas N, Nettelbeck T, Burns N. Assessment of driving simulator validity and acceptability for older adult drivers. Adv Transp Stud. 2016;39:69–88.
  • Salthouse TA. Selective review of cognitive aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(5):754–760. doi:10.1017/S1355617710000706
  • Bergman I, Johansson K, Almkvist O, Lundberg C. Health-adjusted neuropsychological test norms based on 463 older Swedish car drivers. Scand J Psychol. 2016;57(2):93–107. doi:10.1111/sjop.12273
  • Selander H, Wressle E, Samuelsson K. Cognitive prerequisites for fitness to drive: norm values for the TMT, UFOV and NorSDSA tests. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):231–239. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1614214
  • Ball K, Clay O, Wadley V, Roth D Predicting driving performance in older adults with the useful field of view test: a meta-analysis. In Rizzo M, Lee JD, McGehee DV, editors. Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; June 27–30, 2005.; Rockport, Maine, Iowa City: University of Iowa; 2005: 51–57.
  • McManus B, Cox MK, Vance DE, Stavrinos D. Predicting motor vehicle collisions in a driving simulator in young adults using the useful field of view assessment. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(8):818–823. doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1027339
  • Clay O, Wadley V, Edwards J, Roth D, Roenker D, Ball K. Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: current and future implications. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(8):724–731. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000175009.08626.65
  • Ball K, Roenker D, Wadley V, et al. Can high-risk older drivers be identified through performance-based measures in a Department of motor vehicles setting? J Am Ger Soc. 2006;54(1):77–84. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00568.x
  • Vaucher P, Herzig D, Cardoso I, Herzog MH, Mangin P, Favrat B. The trail making test as a screening instrument for driving performance in older drivers: a translational research. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):123. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-123
  • Sanchez-Cubillo I, Perianez J, Adrover-Roig D, et al. Construct validity of the trail making test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(3):438–450. doi:10.1017/S1355617709090626
  • Nouri F, Lincoln N. Validation of a cognitive assessment: predicting driving performance after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1992;6(4):275–281. doi:10.1177/026921559200600402
  • Lundberg C, Caneman G, Samuelsson S, Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Almkvist O. The assessment of fitness to drive after a stroke: the Nordic stroke driver screening assessment. Scand J Psychol. 2003;44(1):23–30. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00317
  • Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Nouri FM. Stroke Drivers Screening Assessment: Revised Manual. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham; 2012.
  • Selander H, Johansson K, Lundberg C, Falkmer T. The Nordic stroke driver screening assessment as predictor for the outcome of an on-road test. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(1):10–17.
  • Edwards JD, Ross LA, Wadley VG, et al. The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(4):275–286. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.001
  • Mathias J, Lucas L. Cognitive predictors of unsafe driving in older drivers: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(4):637–653. doi:10.1017/S1041610209009119
  • Better Health While Aging. Ways that memory & thinking change with normal aging [homepage on the internet]. Available from https://betterhealthwhileaging.net/how-brain-function-changes-with-normal-cognitive-aging. Accessed September 29, 2021.