New Device to Measure Cross-Sectional Areas and Segmental Volumes of Objects and Limbs

References

• Damstra RJ, Glazenburg EJ, Hop WCJ. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: a new gold standard for arm volume measurements. Brest Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99:267–273. doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9213-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Branje E. Arm lymphoedema in a cohort of breast cancer survivors 10 years after diagnosis. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):166–173. doi:10.3109/02841860903483676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuß M, Killaars R, Piatkowski de Grzymala A, Binnebösel M, Neumann U. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring breast cancer-related lymphedema in the upper limb: a cross-sectional study. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(6):525–532. doi:10.1089/lrb.2017.0076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein CS, Rice CL, Marsh GD. Normalized force, activation, and coactivation in the arm muscles of young and old men. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91(3):1341–1349. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.3.1341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Couto MA, Prado-Medeiros CL, Oliveira AB, et al. Muscle atrophy, voluntary activation disturbances, and low serum concentrations of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 are associated with weakness in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2014;94(7):957–967. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chromy A, Zalud L, Dobsak P, Suskevic I, Mrkvicova V. Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods. SpringerPlus. 2015;4(1):707–722. doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1468-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armer JM, Stewart BR. A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population. Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(4):208–217. doi:10.1089/lrb.2005.3.208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharkey AR, King SW, Kuo RY, Bickerton SB, Ramsden AJ, Furniss D. Measuring limb volume: accuracy and reliability of tape measurement versus Perometer measurement. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(2):182–186. doi:10.1089/lrb.2017.0039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Port IGL, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lindeman E, Kwakkel G. Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(11):935–951. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802ee464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J. Progressive resistance training after stroke: effects on muscle strength, muscle tone, gait performance and perceived participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(1):42–48. doi:10.2340/16501977-0129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akagi R, Takai Y, Ohta M, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Muscle volume compared to cross-sectional area is more appropriate for evaluating muscle strength in young and elderly individuals. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):564–569. doi:10.1093/ageing/afp122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgrado JP, Bracale P, Bates J, et al. Lymphoedema: what can be measured and how.Overview. Eur J Lymphology Relat Probl. 2010;21(61):3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Knarr BA, Ramsay JW, Buchanan TS, Higginson JS, Binder-Macleod SA. Muscle volume as a predictor of maximum force generating ability in the plantar flexors post-stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(6):971–976. doi:10.1002/mus.23835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidhar D, Armer JM, Deutscher D, Shyu CR, Azuri J, Madsen R. Measurement issues in anthropometric measures of limb volume change in persons at risk for and living with lymphedema: a reliability study. J Pers Med. 2015;5(4):341–353. doi:10.3390/jpm5040341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren KN. Venoconstrictive thigh cuffs Iipede fluid shifts during simulated microgravity [Master thesis]. Colorado State University; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Cassisi DV. Mechanical performance of inflatable inserts used in limb prosthetics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(4):365–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nederlandse vereniging voor dermatologie en venereologie. Richtlijn Lymfoedeem 2014 (Dutch) [Lymphedema Guideline 2014, Patient version]. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/gerelateerde_documenten/f/11792/Patientenversie%20Lymfoedeem.pdf. Acessed April 13, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Mayrovitz HN, Macdonald J, Davey S, Olson K, Washington E. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema. Phys Ther. 2007;87(10):1362–1368. doi:10.2522/ptj.20060382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidding JT, Viehoff PB, Beurskens CHG, van Laarhoven HWM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van der Wees PJ. Measurement properties of instruments for measuring of lymphedema: systematic review. Phys Ther. 2016;96(12):1965–1981. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vrieze T, Gebruers N, Tjalma WAA, et al. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(7):1221–1232. doi:10.1177/0269215519835907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza C, Nørregaard S, Moffatt C, Karlsmark T. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in volume measurements of the lower extremity using perometer. Lymphat Res Biol. 2020;18(5):416–421. doi:10.1089/lrb.2019.0063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler H, Kuznetsova A, Vogt P, Rosenhahn B. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(4):483–488. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley JM, Weiler MJ, Frank N, Bober L, Dixon JB, Stratford PW. Assessing arm volume in people during and after treatment for breast cancer: reliability and convergent validity of the LymphaTech System. Phys Ther. 2020;100(3):457–467. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzz175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitali A, Togni G, Regazzoni D, Rizzi C, Molinero G. A virtual environment to evaluate the arm volume for lymphedema affected patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;198:105795. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwen FP, Stemkens J, de Schipper PJ, van der Wouw P, Heitink MV, van Langen H. Estimates for assessment of lymphedema: reliability and validity of extremity measurements. Lymphat Res Biol. 2022;20(1):48–52. doi:10.1089/lrb.2019.0082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs JAGN, Bijkerk E, Schols RM, Keuter XHA, van der Hulst RRWJ, Qiu SS. Evaluation of a novel water-based volumetric device for measuring upper limb lymphedema: first experience with healthy volunteers. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019;17(4):434–439. doi:10.1089/lrb.2018.0037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulesar Sukul DMKS, den Hoed PT, Johannes EJ, van Dolder R, Benda E. Direct and indirect methods for the quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volumetry, the disk model method and the frustum sign model method, using the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement. J Biomed Eng. 1993;15(6):477–480. doi:10.1016/0141-5425(93)90062-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanton AWB, Northfield JW, Holroyd B, Mortimer PS, Levick JR. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer). Lymphology. 1997;30:77–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lette J. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(34):5434–5440. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffa R, Mereu E, Lussu P, et al. A new, effective and low-cost three-dimensional approach for the estimation of upper-limb volume. Sensors. 2015;15(6):12342–12357. doi:10.3390/s150612342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geil MD. Consistency and accuracy of measurement of lower-limb amputee anthropometrics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(2):131–140. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2004.05.0054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suyi Yang E, Aslani N, McGarry A. Influences and trends of various shape-capture methods on outcomes in trans-tibial prosthetics: a systematic review. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 2019;43(5):540–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternò L, Ibrahimi M, Rosini E, et al. Residual limb volume fluctuations in transfemoral amputees. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12273. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91647-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson AS, Donovan-Hall MK, Kheng S, et al. Selecting appropriate 3D scanning technologies for prosthetic socket design and transtibial residual limb shape characterization. J Prosthetics Orthot. 2022;34(1):33–43. doi:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000350
   Google Scholar
• Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sing C, McKenzie DC. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1639–1644. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.26822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AP, Hajer NM, Hemenway K, Miller AC. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume. Phys Ther. 2002;82(12):1201–1212. doi:10.1093/ptj/82.12.1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrovitz HN, Sims N, Hill CJ, Hernandez T, Greenshner A, Diep H. Hand volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement. Lymphology. 2006;39(2):95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzia J. Volume measurement in lymphoedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care. 1995;4(1):11–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.1995.tb00047.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karges JR, Mark BE, Stikeleather SJ, Worrell TW. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume. Phys Ther. 2003;83(2):134–145. doi:10.1093/ptj/83.2.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer RS, Rietman JS, Geertzen JHB, Bosmans JC, Dijkstra PU. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema. Lymphology. 2004;37(3):127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devoogdt N, Lemkens H, Geraerts I, et al. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability. Int Angiol. 2010;29(5):401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaenssens N, Buyl R, Lievens P, Fontaine C, Lamote J. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm. Lymphology. 2013;46(3):132–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorson H, Höijer P. Standardised measurements used to order compression garments can be used to calculate arm volumes to evaluate lymphoedema treatment. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(6):410–415. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2012.714785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez Penha TR, Slangen JJG, Heuts EM, Voogd AC, Von Meyenfeldt MF. Prevalence of lymphoedema more than five years after breast cancer treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(12):1059–1063. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanolla R, Monzeglio C, Balzarini A, Martino G. Evaluation of the results of three different methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment. J Surg Oncol. 1984;26(3):210–213. doi:10.1002/jso.2930260317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boris M, Weindorf S, Lasinski B, Boris G. Lymphedema reduction by noninvasive complex lymphedema therapy. Oncology. 1994;8(9):95–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunce IH, Mirolo BR, Hennessy JM, Jones LC, Ward LC. Post-mastectomy lymphoedema treatment and measurement. Med J Aust. 1994;161(2):125–128. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127342.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pani SP, Vanamail P, Yuvaraj J. Limb circumference measurement for recording edema volume in patients with filarial lymphedema. Lymphology. 1995;28(2):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniec SA, Ward LC, Refshauge KM, et al. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema - comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report. Cancer Invest. 2010;28(1):54–62. doi:10.3109/07357900902918494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberger RP, Blazek C, Amsler F, et al. Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:138. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan CW, Coutts F, Bulley C. Measurement of lower limb volume: agreement between the vertically oriented perometer and a tape measure method. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(3):247–251. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katch V, Michael ED Jr., Amuchie FA. The use of body weight and girth measurements in predicting segmental leg volume of females. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):293–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennihan R, Mackereth M. Calculating volume changes in a swollen extremity from surface measurements. Am J Surg. 1973;126(5):649–652. doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(73)80014-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnke E. Volumbestimmung ans Umfangmessungen. Folia Angiologica. 1976;24:228–232.
   Google Scholar