Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie’s disease: techniques and patient preference

References

• KadiogluAAkmanTSanliOGurkanLCakanMCeltikMSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a critical analysisEur Urol200650223524816716495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarRNehraASurgical and minimally invasive treatments for Peyronie’s diseaseCurr Opin Urol200919658959419741538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarsonCCLevineLAOutcomes of surgical treatment of Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int2014113570471324219080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RalphDGonzalez-CadavidNMironeVThe management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelinesJ Sex Med2010772359237420497306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevineLABensonJHooverCInflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center studyJ Sex Med20107113775378320722782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevineLADimitriouRJA surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s diseaseInt J Impot Res200012314715111045907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottFBBradleyWETimmGWManagement of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesisUrology19732180824766860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WilsonSKDelkJRA new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesisJ Urol19941524112111238072079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonSKClevesMADelkJR2ndUltrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity)J Urol199615511351377490811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarberBBMentor alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis cylinder aneurysm: an unusual complicationInt J Impot Res19957113167670588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CarsonCCPenile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunctionInt J Impot Res200012Suppl 4S122S12611035399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KadiogluASanliOAkmanTCakanMErolBMamadovFSurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a single center experience with 145 patientsEur Urol200853243243917467161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustoniEColomboFRomanòALGuarneriAKartalas GoumasICaz-zanigaASoft prosthesis implant and relaxing albugineal incision with saphenous grafting for surgical therapy of Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year experience and long-term follow-up on 145 operated patientsEur Urol2005472223229 discussion 22915661418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShaeerOTrans-corporal incision of Peyronie’s plaquesJ Sex Med20118258959320955315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrassoMLaniaCFortunaFBlancoSPiacentiniIPreservation of cavernosal erectile function after soft penile prosthesis implant in Peyronie’s disease: long-term followupAdv Urol2008200864605219081839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MontorsiFGuazzoniGBergamaschiFRigattiPPatient-partner satisfaction with semirigid penile prostheses for Peyronie’s disease: a 5-year followup studyJ Urol19931506181918218230513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontorsiFGuazzoniGBarbieriLAMS 700 CX inflatable penile implants for Peyronie’s disease: functional results, morbidity and patient-partner satisfactionInt J Impot Res1996828185 discussion 85–868858396
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akin-OlugbadeOParkerMGuhringPMulhallJDeterminants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgeryJ Sex Med20063474374816839332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungESolomonMDeYoungLBrockGBComparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfactionJ Sex Med201310112855286023210973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorgansternSLLong-term experience with the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis in the treatment of Peyronie’s diseaseTech Urol19973286889297768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JenaABSeaburySLakdawallaDChandraAMalpractice risk according to physician specialtyN Engl J Med2011365762963621848463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaplanGWMalpractice risks for urologistsUrology19985121831859495695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SunaryoPLColacoMTerleckiRPenile prostheses and the litigiouspatient: a legal database reviewJ Sex Med201411102589259425070914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SansaloneSGaraffaGDjinovicRSimultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with erectile dysfunction and severe fibrosis of the corpora cavernosaJ Sex Med2012971937194422672346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KadiogluAKüçükdurmazFSanliOCurrent status of the surgical management of Peyronie’s diseaseNat Rev Urol2011829510621304544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-SalamancaJIMuellerAMoncadaICarballidoJMulhallJPPenile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art reviewJ Sex Med2011871880188921492405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ViciniPDe MarcoFAntoniniGUse of inflatable penile prostheses AMS CX with momentary squeeze in a patient with Peyronie’s disease after removal of two previously implanted penile prosthesesArch Ital Urol Androl2014861464724704933
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PeritoPWilsonSThe Peyronie’s plaque “scratch”: an adjunct to modelingJ Sex Med20131051194119723750353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SegalRLBurnettALSurgical management for Peyronie’s diseaseWorld J Mens Health201331111123658860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YafiFASangkumPMcCaslinIRHellstromWJStrategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie’s disease and corporal fibrosisCurr Urol Rep20151642125712763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShindelAWBullockTLBrandesSUrologist practice patterns in the management of Peyronie’s disease: a nationwide surveyJ Sex Med20085495496418042214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaraffaGMinerviniAChristopherNAMinhasSRalphDJThe management of residual curvature after penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s diseaseBJU Int201110871152115621314814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdibiMHudakSJMoreyAFPenile plication without degloving enables effective correction of complex Peyronie’s deformitiesUrology201279483183522365444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HudakSJMoreyAFAdibiMBagrodiaAFavorable patient reported outcomes after penile plication for wide array of peyronie disease abnormalitiesJ Urol201318931019102423017514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimDHLesserTFAboseifSRSubjective patient-reported experiences after surgery for Peyronie’s disease: corporeal plication versus plaque incision with vein graftUrology200871469870218387398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChungPHScottJFMoreyAFHigh patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s diseaseJ Sex Med20141161593159824708140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DevineCJJrHortonCESurgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with a dermal graffJ Urol1974111144494273261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LueTFEl-SakkaAIVenous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part I: techniqueJ Urol19981606 Pt 1204720499817320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiCYKayesOKellPDChristopherNMinhasSRalphDJPenile suspensory ligament division for penile augmentation: indications and resultsEur Urol200649472973316473458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RigaudGBergerRECorrective procedures for penile shortening due to Peyronie’s diseaseJ Urol199515323683707815586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RolleLCerutiCTamagnoneAT05-O-19 The “Apollo” tissue expander: a novel approach to penile shortening due to fibrosisSexologies200817Suppl 1S88
   Google Scholar
• SansaloneSGaraffaGDjinovicRSimultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shorteningJ Sex Med20129131632122023552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BertramRACarsonCC3rdAltafferLFSevere penile curvature after implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesisJ Urol198813947437453352036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FishmanIJCorporeal reconstruction procedures for complicated penile implantsUrol Clin North Am198916173902916281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BallTPJrSurgical repair of penile “SST” deformityUrology19801566036047394993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RolleLCerutiCTimpanoMA new, innovative, lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal-ventral patch graft: the “sliding technique”J Sex Med2012992389239522429331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EgydioPHKuehhasFESansaloneSPenile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie’s disease using circular and longitudinal graftingBJU Int20131114 Pt BE213E21923107452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NehraAAlterowitzRCulkinDJPeyronie’s diseaseJ Urol Epub June 9, 2015S0022-5347(15)04143926066402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar