References
- TincelloDGWilliamsAFowlerGEAdamsEJRichmondDHAlfirevicZDifferences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctorsBJOG2003110121041104414664873
- EoganMDalyLO’ConnellPRO’HerlihyCDoes the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?BJOG2006113219019416411997
- KalisVLandsmanovaJBednarovaBKarbanovaJLaineKRokytaZEvaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degreesInt J Gynecol Obstet20111123220224
- FreemanRMHollandsHJBarronLFKapoorDSCutting a Mediolateral Episiotomy at the Correct Angle: Evaluation of a new device: The Episcissors-60Med Devices (Auckl)20147232824570598
- PatelRPUbaleSMEvaluation of the angled EPISCISSORS-60® episiotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveries: A case seriesMed Devices (Auckl)2014725325625114598
- Gonzalez-DiazEMoreno CeaLFernandez CoronaATrigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal deliveryInt Urogynecol J201526223524225227745
- StedenfeldtMPirhonenJBlixEWilsqaardTVonenBQianPEpisiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a case-control studyBJOG2012119672473022390647
- WoodLEggerMGluudLLEmpirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyBMJ2008336764460160518316340
- AndrewsVSultanAHThakarRJonesPWOccult anal sphincter injuries – myth or reality?BJOG2006113219520016411998
- El-DinASKamalMMAminMAComparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomised controlled trialJ Obstet Gynaecol Res20144071877188225056465
- van DillenJSpaansMvan KeijsterenWA prospective multicenter audit of labour room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the NetherlandsInt J Gynaecol Obstet201010829710019922933