181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The role of anticipation in drug addiction and reward

, &
Pages 1-10 | Published online: 16 Dec 2013

References

  • Hunt WA, Barnett LW, Branch LG. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol. 1971;27(4):455–456.
  • Beck AT, Wright FD, Newman CF, Liese BS. Cognitive Therapy of Substance Abuse. New York: The Guilford Press; 1993.
  • Hawkins J, Hollingworth W, Campbell R. Long-term smoking relapse: a study using the british household panel survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(12):1228–1235.
  • Marlatt GA. Taxonomy of high-risk situations for alcohol relapse: evolution and development of a cognitive-behavioral model. Addiction. 1996;91 Suppl:S37–S49.
  • O’Connell KA, Shiffman S, Decarlo LT. Does extinction of responses to cigarette cues occur during smoking cessation? Addiction. 2011;106(2):410–417.
  • Lewis M. Memoirs of an Addicted Brain: A Neuroscientist Examines his Former Life on Drugs. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs; 2011.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
  • Smith KS, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW. Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(27):E255–E264.
  • Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Telang F. Addiction: beyond dopamine reward circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(37):15037–15042.
  • Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(10):1642–1652.
  • Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(11):652–669.
  • Thewissen R, van den Hout M, Havermans RC, Jansen A. Context-dependency of cue-elicited urge to smoke. Addiction. 2005;100(3):387–396.
  • Niaura RS, Rohsenow DJ, Binkoff JA, Monti PM, Pedraza M, Abrams DB. Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988;97(2):133–152.
  • Childress AR, Hole AV, Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, McLellan AT, O’Brien CP. Cue reactivity and cue reactivity interventions in drug dependence. NIDA Res Monogr. 1993;137:73–95.
  • Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction. 1999;94(3):327–340.
  • Drummond DC. What does cue-reactivity have to offer clinical research? Addiction. 2000;95 Suppl 2:S129–S144.
  • Tsurumi K, Takahashi H. [Gambling brain]. Brain Nerve. 2013;65(1):77–83. Japanese.
  • Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;97(1–2):1–20.
  • Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Hutton SB, Bamborough H, Duka T. Contingency knowledge is necessary for learned motivated behaviour in humans: relevance for addictive behaviour. Addiction. 2006;101(8):1153–1166.
  • Lovibond PF, Shanks DR. The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002;28(1):3–26.
  • Hogarth L, Duka T. Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184(3–4):553–566.
  • Field M, Duka T. Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behav Pharmacol. 2001;12(3):183–194.
  • Dar R, Rosen-Korakin N, Shapira O, Gottlieb Y, Frenk H. The craving to smoke in flight attendants: relations with smoking deprivation, anticipation of smoking, and actual smoking. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010;119(1):248–253.
  • Dar R, Stronguin F, Marouani R, Krupsky M, Frenk H. Craving to smoke in orthodox Jewish smokers who abstain on the Sabbath: a comparison to a baseline and a forced abstinence workday. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;183(3):294–299.
  • Juliano LM, Brandon TH. Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: evidence with urge and reaction time. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;6(1):45–53.
  • Dols M, Willems B, van den Hout M, Bittoun R. Smokers can learn to influence their urge to smoke. Addict Behav. 2000;25(1):103–108.
  • Carter BL, Tiffany ST. The cue-availability paradigm: the effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;9(2):183–190.
  • Dols M, van den Hout M, Kindt M, Willems B. The urge to smoke depends on the expectation of smoking. Addiction. 2002;97(1):87–93.
  • Thewissen R, van der Meijden VA, Havermans RC, van den Hout M, Jansen A. From the office to the pub: the role of smoking-relevant contexts and cue-elicited urge to smoke. Eur Addict Res. 2008;14(4):198–205.
  • Thewissen R, Snijders SJ, Havermans RC, van den Hout M, Jansen A. Renewal of cue-elicited urge to smoke: implications for cue exposure treatment. Beh Res Ther. 2006;44(10):1441–1449.
  • Droungas A, Ehrman RN, Childress AR, O’Brien CP. Effect of smoking cues and cigarette availability on craving and smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 1995;20(5):657–673.
  • Wertz JM, Sayette MA. A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity of self-reported urge. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;9(1):3–13.
  • Yamamoto RT, Karlsgodt KH, Rott D, Lukas SE, Elman I. Effects of perceived cocaine availability on subjective and objective responses to the drug. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2007;2:30.
  • Field M, Duka T. Cue reactivity in smokers: the effects of perceived cigarette availability and gender. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004;78(3):647–652.
  • Davidson D, Tiffany ST, Johnston W, Flury L, Li TK. Using the cue-availability paradigm to assess cue reactivity. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27(8):1251–1256.
  • Kruse MI, Radnovich AJ, Kalapatapu RK, Mehdiyoun N, Chambers RA, Davidson D. Effects of alcohol availability, access to alcohol, and naltrexone on self-reported craving and patterns of drinking in response to an alcohol-cue availability procedure. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(2):205–215.
  • MacKillop J, Lisman SA. Reactivity to alcohol cues: isolating the role of perceived availability. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;13(3):229–237.
  • Mackillop J, Lisman SA. Examining the effect of perceived availability on craving for alcohol: A quasi-experimental approach. Addict Res Theory. 2007;15(3):231–245.
  • Tiffany ST. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(2):147–168.
  • Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Hutton SB, Elbers N, Duka T. Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;185(4):495–504.
  • Field M, Marhe R, Franken IH. The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. Epub May 13, 2013.
  • Luijten M, Field M, Franken IH. Pharmacological interventions to modulate attentional bias in addiction. CNS Spectr. Epub August 1, 2013.
  • Field M, Munafo MR, Franken IH. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(4):589–607.
  • Rose AK, Brown K, Field M, Hogarth L. The contributions of value-based decision-making and attentional bias to alcohol-seeking following devaluation. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1241–1249.
  • Wertz JM, Sayette MA. Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2001;15(3):268–271.
  • McCarthy DE, Gloria R, Curtin JJ. Attention bias in nicotine withdrawal and under stress. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(1):77–90.
  • Field M, Hogarth L, Bleasdale D, Wright P, Fernie G, Christiansen P. Alcohol expectancy moderates attentional bias for alcohol cues in light drinkers. Addiction. 2011;106(6):1097–1103.
  • Hogarth L, Balleine BW, Corbit LH, Killcross S. Associative learning mechanisms underpinning the transition from recreational drug use to addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1282:12–24.
  • Jones A, Hogarth L, Christiansen P, Rose AK, Martinovic J, Field M. Reward expectancy promotes generalized increases in attentional bias for rewarding stimuli. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2333–2342.
  • Werthmann J, Roefs A, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Desire lies in the eyes: Attention bias for chocolate is related to craving and self-endorsed eating permission. Appetite. 2013;70:81–89.
  • Wilson SJ, Sayette MA, Fiez JA. Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a neurocognitive analysis. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(3):211–214.
  • Wilson SJ, Sayette MA, Delgado MR, Fiez JA. Instructed smoking expectancy modulates cue-elicited neural activity: a preliminary study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7(4):637–645.
  • McBride D, Barrett SP, Kelly JT, Aw A, Dagher A. Effects of expectancy and abstinence on the neural response to smoking cues in cigarette smokers: an fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(12):2728–2738.
  • Hayashi T, Ko JH, Strafella AP, Dagher A. Dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex interactions during self-control of cigarette craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(11):4422–4427.
  • Ballard IC, Murty VP, Carter RM, MacInnes JJ, Huettel SA, Adcock RA. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex drives mesolimbic dopaminergic regions to initiate motivated behavior. J Neurosci. 2011;31(28):10340–10346.
  • McClure SM, Ericson KM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. Time discounting for primary rewards. J Neurosci. 2007;27(21):5796–5804.
  • Kim S, Hwang J, Lee D. Prefrontal coding of temporally discounted values during intertemporal choice. Neuron. 2008;59(1):161–172.
  • Essex BG, Clinton SA, Wonderley LR, Zald DH. The impact of the posterior parietal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on the optimization of long-term versus immediate value. J Neurosci. 2012;32(44):15403–15413.
  • Olmstead MC. Animal models of drug addiction: Where do we go from here? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006;59(4):625–653.
  • MacKillop J, Amlung MT, Few LR, Ray LA, Sweet LH, Munafò MR. Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011;216(3):305–321.
  • Jones A, Christiansen P, Nederkoorn C, Houben K, Field M. Fluctuating disinhibition: Implications for the understanding and treatment of alcohol and other substance use disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:140.
  • Bickel WK, Marsch LA. Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction. 2001;96(1):73–86.
  • Washio Y, Higgins ST, Heil SH, et al. Delay discounting is associated with treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;19(3):243–248.
  • Sheffer C, Mackillop J, McGeary J, et al. Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers. Am J Addict. 2012;21(3):221–232.
  • Logan GD, Cowan WB, Davis KA. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984;10(2):276–291.
  • Newman JP, Kosson DS. Passive avoidance learning in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95(3):252–260.
  • Papachristou H, Nederkoorn C, Corstjens J, Jansen A. The role of impulsivity and perceived availability on cue-elicited craving for alcohol in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;224(1):145–153.
  • Field M, Christiansen P, Cole J, Goudie A. Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction. 2007;102(4):579–586.
  • Jones A, Rose AK, Cole J, Field M. Effects of alcohol cues on craving and ad libitum alcohol consumption in social drinkers: the role of disinhibition. J Exp Psychopathol. 2013;4(3):239–249.
  • Coskunpinar A, Cyders MA. Impulsivity and substance-related attentional bias: A meta-analytic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133(1):1–14.
  • Solomon RL, Corbit JD. An opponent-process theory of motivation. II. Cigarette addiction. J Abnorm Psychol. 1973;81(2):158–171.
  • Solomon RL, Corbit JD. An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol Rev. 1974;81(2):119–145.
  • Koob GF. Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation as a driver of drug-seeking behavior. Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2008;5(4):207–215.
  • Conklin CA, Tiffany ST. Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction. 2002;97(2):155–167.
  • Amiaz R, Levy D, Vainiger D, Grunhaus L, Zangen A. Repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption. Addiction. 2009;104(4):653–660.
  • Camus M, Halelamien N, Plassmann H, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases valuations during food choices. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30(10):1980–1988.
  • Potenza MN, Sofuoglu M, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. Neuroscience of behavioral and pharmacological treatments for addictions. Neuron. 2011;69(4):695–712.