Antibacterial, Antibiofilm, and Tooth Color Preservation Capacity of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Varnish (in vitro Study)

References

• Koo H, Xiao J, Klein MI, Jeon JG. Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(12):3024–3032. doi:10.1128/JB.01649-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leme AFP, Koo H, Bellato CM, Bedi G, Cury JA. The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation—new insight. J Dent Res. 2006;85(10):878–887. doi:10.1177/154405910608501002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura S, Yonezawa H, Motegi M, et al. Inhibiting effects of Streptococcus salivarius on competence-stimulating peptide-dependent biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24(2):152–161. doi:10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00489.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krzyściak W, Jurczak A, Kościelniak D, Bystrowska B, Skalniak A. The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Europ J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(4):499–515. doi:10.1007/s10096-013-1993-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos J, Palmer S, Zeng L, et al. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7(1). doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishara SE, Ostby AW. White spot lesions: formation, prevention, and treatment. Semin Orthodont. 2008;14(3):174–182. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Hattab FN, Qudeimat MA, al-Rimawi HS. Dental discoloration: an overview. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):291–310. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00413.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayekar SM. Shades of a color. Illusion or reality? Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45(1):155–172. doi:10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00474-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry DA, Geller W, Tric O, Anderson MJ, Tourville M, Kobashigawa A. Anatomical form defines color: function, form, and aesthetics. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2002;14(1):59–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EM, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004;83:C35–38. doi:10.1177/154405910408301s07
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodbelt RHW, O’Brien WJ, Fan PL, Frazer-Dib JG, Yu R. Translucency of human dental enamel. J Dent Res. 1981;60(10):1749–1753. doi:10.1177/00220345810600100401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans A, Leishman S, Walsh L, Seow W. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Austral Dental J. 2015;60(2):247–254. doi:10.1111/adj.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert P, Moore LE. Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(4):703–715. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02664.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawden JW. Fluoride varnish: a useful new tool for public health dentistry. J Public Health Dent. 1998;58(4):266–269. doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.1998.tb03007.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuloglu N, Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Ozer F. Effect of fluoride varnish with added casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on the acid resistance of the primary enamel. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16(1):103. doi:10.1186/s12903-016-0299-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen P, Bagheri R, Walker GD, et al. Effect of calcium phosphate addition to fluoride containing dental varnishes on enamel demineralization. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(3):357–365. doi:10.1111/adj.12385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Sharda S, Shafiq N, Kumar A, Goyal A. Topical fluoride-antibacterial agent combined therapy versus topical fluoride monotherapy in preventing dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(6):629–646. doi:10.1007/s40368-020-00561-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzalaf MAR, Pessan JP, Honório HM, Cate ten V. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:97–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harish V, Tewari D, Gaur M, et al. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, antimicrobial, and agro-food applications. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(3):457. doi:10.3390/nano12030457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguib G, Maghrabi AA, Mira AI, Mously HA, Hajjaj M, Hamed MT. Influence of inorganic nanoparticles on dental materials’ mechanical properties. A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):897. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03652-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer N, Evis Z, Kayhan SM, Tahmasebifar A, Koç M. Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications. J Magnesium Alloys. 2018;6(1):23–43. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amukarimi S, Mozafari M. Biodegradable magnesium‐based biomaterials: an overview of challenges and opportunities. Med Comm. 2021;2(2):123–144. doi:10.1002/mco2.59
   Google Scholar
• Cai L, Chen J, Liu Z, Wang H, Yang H, Ding W. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles: effective agricultural antibacterial agent against ralstonia solanacearum. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:790. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arass J, Fadil A. The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement. Heliyon. 2019;5(10). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan J, Maini C. Nanoparticles: a promising novel adjunct for dentistry. Indian J Dent Sci. 2019;11:167–173. doi:10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_26_19
   Google Scholar
• Vidic J, Stankic S, Haque F, et al. Selective antibacterial effects of mixed ZnMgO nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(5). doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1595-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamalaw SJ, Kareem FA, Noori AJ. Dispersion and demineralization inhibition capacity of novel magnesium oxide nanoparticles varnish on enamel surfaces against streptococcus mutans (an In Vitro Study). Coatings. 2023;13(6):1018. doi:10.3390/coatings13061018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahmoradi M, Hunter N, Swain M. Efficacy of fluoride varnishes with added calcium phosphate in the protection of the structural and mechanical properties of enamel. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7834905. doi:10.1155/2017/7834905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghgoo R, Saderi H, Eskandari M, Haghshenas H, Rezvani M. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of conventional and nanosilver-containing varnishes on oral streptococci. J Dentist. 2014;15(2):57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kis VK, Sulyok A, Hegedűs M, Kovács I, Rózsa N, Kovács Z. Magnesium incorporation into primary dental enamel and its effect on mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2021;120:104–115. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Hedberg J, Blomberg E, Wold S, Odnevall Wallinder I. Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res. 2016;18(9):285. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3597-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medicom safety data sheet. Duraflor varnish; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca MP, Franca JR, Macedo FAFF, et al. Propolis varnish: antimicrobial properties against cariogenic bacteria, cytotoxicity, and sustained-release profile. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–6. doi:10.1155/2014/348647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th. Clinical and Labratory Standards Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–79. doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão de LCC, Furletti VF, Bersan SMF, et al. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against streptococcus mutans and their antiproliferative effects. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:751435. doi:10.1155/2012/751435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugger SD, Baumberger C, Jost M, Jenni W, Brugger U, Mühlemann K. Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole GA. Classic spotlight: plate counting you can count on. J Bacteriol. 2016;198(23):3127. doi:10.1128/JB.00711-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanta YK, Biswas K, Jena SK, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Mohanta TK. Anti-biofilm and antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized by the reducing activity of phytoconstituents present in the Indian medicinal plants. Front Microbiol. 2020;2020:11.
   Google Scholar
• Lembke C, Podbielski A, Hidalgo-Grass C, Jonas L, Hanski E, Kreikemeyer B. Characterization of biofilm formation by clinically relevant serotypes of group a streptococci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(4):2864–2875. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.4.2864-2875.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro Melo P, Ferreira LM, Filho AN, Zafalon LF, Vicente HIG, de Souza V. Comparison of methods for the detection of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis. Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44(1):119–124. doi:10.1590/S1517-83822013005000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnusayri MO, Sghaireen MG, Mathew M, Alzarea B, Bandela V. Shade selection in esthetic dentistry: a review. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23331. doi:10.7759/cureus.23331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derdilopoulou FV, Zantner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Evaluation of visual and spectrophotometric shade analyses: a clinical comparison of 3758 teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):414–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odaira C, Itoh S, Ishibashi K. Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: the crystaleye spectrophotometer®. J Prosthod Res. 2011;55(4):199–205. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2010.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daas I, Badr S, Osman E. Comparison between fluoride and nano-hydroxyapatite in remineralizing initial enamel lesion: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dental Pract. 2018;19(3):306–312. doi:10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10024-2258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu OY, Mei ML, Zhao IS, Li QL, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Remineralisation of enamel with silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride. Dent. Mater. 2018;34(12):e344–e352. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaechi BT. Protocols to study dental caries in vitro: pH cycling models. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1922:379–392. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9012-2_34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loveren van C, Buijs JF, Buijs MJ, Cate ten JM. Protection of bovine enamel and dentine by chlorhexidine and fluoride varnishes in a bacterial demineralization model. CRE. 1996;30(1):45–51. doi:10.1159/000262136
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar A, Kurthukoti A, Gupta P. Cariogenicity and acidogenicity of human milk, plain and sweetened bovine milk: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(3):239–247. doi:10.17796/jcpd.34.3.lk08l57045043444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanduti D, Sterbenk P, Artnik B. Fluoride: a review of use and effects on health. Materia Socio Medica. 2016;28(2):133–137. doi:10.5455/msm.2016.28.133-137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez-Mier EA. Fluoride: its metabolism, toxicity, and role in dental health. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2012;17(1):28–32. doi:10.1177/2156587211428076
   Google Scholar
• FDA U, Food and Drug Administration. CFR-Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Washington, DC, USA: US Food and Drug Administration; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haghshenas L, Amini A, Bashir Bahati A, Rahimi G. In vitro antibacterial biofilm effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on streptococcus mutans. Micro Nano Biomed. 2016;1(1). doi:10.15412/j.mnb.05010104
   Google Scholar
• Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo T, et al. Topical fluoride for caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(11):1279–1291. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghada N, Khaled H, Ali H, et al. Zein based magnesium oxide nanoparticles: assessment of antimicrobial activity for dental implications. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;2018:245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Hernández AP, Vega-Jiménez AL, Vázquez-Olmos AR, Ortega-Maldonado M, Ximenez-Fyvie LA. Antibacterial properties in vitro of magnesium oxide nanoparticles for dental applications. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(3):502. doi:10.3390/nano13030502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NYT, Grelling N, Wetteland CL, Rosario R, Liu H. Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of magnesium oxide nanoparticles (nMgO) against pathogenic bacteria, yeasts, and biofilms. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16260. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34567-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang ZX, Lv BF. MgO nanoparticles as antibacterial agent: preparation and activity. Braz J Chem Eng. 2014;31(3):591–601. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz JE, Teepe JD, Hu Y, Smith CE, Fajardo RJ, Chun YHP. Estimating mineral changes in enamel formation by Ashing/BSE and MicroCT. J Dent Res. 2014;93(3):256–262. doi:10.1177/0022034513520548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh T, Macey R, Ricketts D, et al. Enamel caries detection and diagnosis: an analysis of systematic reviews. J Dent Res. 2022;101(3):261–269. doi:10.1177/00220345211042795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, et al. Dental caries. Nature Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3(1):17030. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. Essentials of Dental Caries. Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall SR, Parker JK, Khutoryanskiy VV. Oral care product formulations, properties and challenges. Colloids Surf B. 2021;200:111567. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone JDB. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Australian Dental Journal. 2008;53(3):286–291. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamalaw SJ, Kareem FA, Gul SS. Association of dental and gingival health status with level of salivary characteristics and Streptococcus mutans in children. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(2):744–750. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Jiang S, Koh D, Hsu CYS. Salivary biomarkers for dental caries. Periodontology. 2016;70(1):128–141. doi:10.1111/prd.12100
   Google Scholar
• Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A critical review of modern concepts for teeth whitening. Dent J. 2019;7(3):79. doi:10.3390/dj7030079
   Google Scholar
• Abdallah MN, Eimar H, Bassett DC, et al. Diagenesis-inspired reaction of magnesium ions with surface enamel mineral modifies properties of human teeth. Acta Biomater. 2016;37:174–183. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lata S, Varghese NO, Varughese JM. Remineralization potential of fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phospho peptide on enamel lesions: an in vitro comparative evaluation. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(1):42–46. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.62634
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tafaroji R, Biria M, Ameri F, Torabzadeh H, Qahari P, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Effect of two fluoride varnishes on the color stability of three resin-based restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Invest Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):355–360. doi:10.1111/jicd.12172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Autio-Gold JT, Barrett AA. Effect of fluoride varnishes on color stability of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2004;29(6):636–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren DP, Henson HA, Chan JT. Dental hygienist and patient comparisons of fluoride varnishes to fluoride gels. J Dent Hyg. 2000;74(2):94–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar