https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-6167
References
- Bahammam AS, Trabelsi K, Pandi-Perumal SR, Jahrami H. Adapting to the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: balancing Benefits and Drawbacks while Developing Policies and Regulations. J Nature Sci Med. 2023;6(3):152–158.
- Hammad M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Ann Biomed Eng 2023;51(3):459–460. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1
- Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care. 2023;27(1):75. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
- Pisica AI, Edu T, Zaharia RM, et al. Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics. Societies. 2023;13(5):118. doi:10.3390/soc13050118
- U.S. Department of Education, O.o.E.T. Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: insights and Recommendations; 2023. 1–64. Avaiable fron: https://tech.ed.gov/. Accessed December 12, 2023.
- Celi LA, Cellini J, Charpignon M-L, et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities-A global review. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(3):e0000022. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022
- Mittermaier M, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies. NPJ Digital Med. 2023;6(1):113. doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00858-z
- Nazer LH, Zatarah R, Waldrip S, et al. Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(6):e0000278. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000278
- Liverpool L. AI intensifies fight against ‘paper mills’ that churn out fake research. Nature. 2023;618(7964):222–223. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-01780-w
- Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: a Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy. 2021;23(1):18. doi:10.3390/e23010018
- Anderson N, Belavy DL, Perle SM, et al. AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023;9(1):e001568. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001568
- Elali FR, Rachid LN. AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns. 2023;4(3):100706. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706
- Walters WH, Wilder EI. Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):14045. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
- Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620–621. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
- Editorials N. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613(7945):612. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
- COPE. Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. 2023. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author#:~:text=COPE%20position%20statement&text=COPE%20joins%20organisations%2C%20such%20as,responsibility%20for%20the%20submitted%20work. Accessed December 21, 2023.
- K&L Gates. Federal Court Rules Work Generated by Artificial Intelligence Alone Is Not Eligible for Copyright Protection. 2023. Available from: https://www.klgates.com/Federal-Court-Rules-Work-Generated-by-Artificial-Intelligence-Alone-Is-Not-Eligible-for-Copyright-Protection-8-30-2023. Accessed December 21, 2023.
- Dove Press. Editorial Policies/Authorship. 2023. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/editorial-policies/authorship#:~:text=Any%20assistance%20from%20AI%20tools,integrity%20of%20their%20article%20content. Accessed December 21, 2023.
- Desaire H, Chua AE, Isom M, et al. Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2023;4(6).
- Hosseini M, Rasmussen L, Resnik Science journals set new authorship guidelines for AI-generated text. Environmental Factor; 2023. Available from: https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2023/3/feature/2-artificial-intelligence-ethics. Accessed December 15, 2023.
- Elkhatat AM, Elsaid K, Almeer S. Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. Int J Educ Integrity. 2023;19(1):17. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5
- Fleischmann C, Aritz J, Writing the rules in AI-assisted writing. Nature Mach Intell. 2023;5(5):469. doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00678-6
- Lovejoy CA, Arora A, Buch V, et al. Key considerations for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare and clinical research. Future Healthc J. 2022;9(1):75–78. doi:10.7861/fhj.2021-0128
- Oniani D, Hilsman J, Peng Y, et al. Adopting and expanding ethical principles for generative artificial intelligence from military to healthcare. NPJ Digital Med. 2023;6(1):225. doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00965-x
- Smeds MR, Mendes B, O’Banion LA, et al. Exploring the pros and cons of using artificial intelligence in manuscript preparation for scientific journals. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023;9(2):101163. doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101163