Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: testing the mental health categories

References

• O’Connor E, Gatien M, Weir C, Calder L. Evaluating the effect of emergency department crowding on triage destination. Int J Emerg Med. 2014;7:16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broadbent M, Moxham L, Dwyer T. Issues associated with the triage of clients with a mental illness in Australian emergency departments. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2010;13(4):117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Happell B, Summers M, Pinikahana J. The triage or psychiatric patients in the hospital emergency department: a comparison between emergency department nurses and psychiatric nurse consultants. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002;10:65–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandes CM, McLeod S, Krause J, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department. CJEM. 2013; 15(4):227–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersson AK, Omberg M, Svedlund M. Triage in the emergency department – a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. Nurs Crit Care. 2006;11(3):136–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein I; CTAS Natioanal Working Group; CEDIS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) implementation guidelines. CJEM. 2004;6(6):421–427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos D, Petrie DA, Beveridge RC, Walter S, Ducharme J. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. CJEM. 2002;4(1):16–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Blitz S, Holroyd BR, Rowe BH. The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system. CJEM. 2007;9(4):260–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong SL, Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, et al. Reliability of computerized emergency triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(3):269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard MJ, Unger B, Spence J, Grafstein E; CTAS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM. 2008;10(2):136–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown AM. Testing the Reliability and Accuracy of Urgency Ratings Determined by Triage Nurses for Mental Health Scenarios, Using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale [master’s thesis]. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba; 2011. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4493. Accessed September 19, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Considine J, Ung L, Thomas S. Clinical decisions using the National Triage Scale: how important is postgraduate education? Accid Emerg Nurs. 2001;9(2):101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores? J Emerg Med. 2012;42(6):736–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallaire C, Poitras J, Aubin K, Lavoie A, Moore L, Audet G. Interrater agreement of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses. CJEM. 2010;12(1):45–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worster A, Sardo A, Eva K, Fernandes CM, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability: a comparison of live versus paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs. 2007;33(4):319–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson P, Gellerstedt M, Carlström ED. Manchester Triage in Sweden – interrater reliability and accuracy. Int Emerg Nurs. 2009; 17(3):143–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braga-Baiak A, Shah A, Pietrobon R, Braga L, Neto AC, Cook C. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of MRI examination of intervertebral disc abnormalities in patients with cervical myelopathy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65(1):91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck BW, Tandon A, Jones PA, Mulvihill AO, Minns RA. An interrater reliability study of new ‘zonal’ classification for reporting the location of retinal haemorrhages in childhood for clinical, legal and research purposes. Br J Opthalmol. 2010;94(7):886–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33(2):363–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigler EA, Tallent-Runnels MK. Examining the validity of scores from an instrument designed to measure metacognition of problem solving. J Gen Psychol. 2006;133(3):252–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell GA, Shafiei T, Salmon P. Facing up to ‘challenging behaviour’: a model for training in staff-client interaction. J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66(7):1644–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DE, Brown AM, Hughes L, Motluk L. Education to improve the triage of mental health patients in general hospital emergency departments. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006;14(4):210–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light RJ. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull. 1971;76(5):365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JY. An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005;13(4):206–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croskerry P. From mindless to mindful practice – cognitive bias and clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26):2445–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruger JP, Lewis LM, Richter CJ. Identifying high-risk patients for triage and resource allocation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(7):794–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar