Condom-use errors and problems among teens attending clinics: better or worse than young adults?

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance, 2009. Atlanta, GA: centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Establishing a Holistic Framework to Reduce Inequities in HIV Viral Hepatitis, STDs, and Tuberculosis in the United States. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2010. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Matthews TJ, Osterman MJ. Births: Final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;59(1):1, 3–71.
   Google Scholar
• Cates W Jr. Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(Suppl 4):S2- S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Condoms and STDs: Fact sheet for public health personnel. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm. Accessed June 29, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby R, Bounse S. Condom effectiveness: Where we now? Sexual Health. In press 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(6):454–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby R, Salazar LF, DiClemente RJ, Yarber WL, Caliendo AM, Staples-Horne M. Accounting for failures may improve precision: evidence supporting improved validity of self-reported condom use. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(8):513–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner L, Stone KM, Macaluso M, Buehler JW, Austin HD. Condom use and risk of gonorrhea and chlamydia: a systematic review of design and measurement factors assessed in epidemiologic studies. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(1):36–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner L, Macaluso M, Austin HD, et al. Application of the case- crossover design to reduce unmeasured confounding in studies of condom effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(8):765–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner L, Newman DR, Austin HD, et al; Project RESPECT Study Group. Condom effectiveness for reducing transmission of gonorrhea and chlamydia: the importance of assessing partner infection status. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(3):242–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Lang D, Harrington KF. Value of consistent condom use: a study of sexually transmitted disease prevention among African American adolescent females. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):901–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Graham CA, Dodge B. Condom use errors and problems among college men. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(9):552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby R, Sanders S, Yarber WL, Graham CA. Condom use errors and problems: a neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. Am JPrevMed. 2003;24(4):367–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby R, DiClemente RJ, Yarber WL, Snow G, Troutman A. An event- specific analysis of condom breakage among African American men at risk of HIV acquisition. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(2):174–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby R, Yarber WL, Sanders SA, Graham CA. Condom discomfort and associated problems with their use among university students. Am J Coll Health. 2005;54(3):143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby R, DiClemente RJ, Yarber WL, Snow G, Troutman A. Refining self-reported condom use among young men at risk of HIV acquisition. Sex Health. 2007;4(3):211–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RA, Salazar LF, Yarber WL, et al. A theory-based approach to understanding condom errors and problems reported by men attending an STI clinic. AIDSBehav. 2008;12(3):412–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarber WL, Crosby RA, Graham CA, et al. Correlates of putting condoms on after sex has begun and removing them before sex ends: a study of men attending an urban public STD clinic. Am J Mens Health. 2007;1(3):190–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RA, Noar S, Head S, Webb E. Condoms and other barrier methods of STI and HIV prevention. In: Gupta S, Kumar B, editors. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Elsevier; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Kaufman E, Milhausen RA, Graham CA, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems: a global view. Sexual Health. 2012;9:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civic D, Scholes D, Ichikawa L, et al. Ineffective use of condoms among young women in managed care. AIDS Care. 2002;14(6):779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? An exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS. 1995;6(1):11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt A, Steiner MJ, Joanis C, et al. Identifying condom users at risk for breakage and slippage: findings from three international sites. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(2):239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W Jr. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(1):6–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman S. Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: computerized ecological momentary assessment. In: Stone AA, Turkkan JS, Bachrach CA, Jobe JB, Kurtzman HS, Cain VS, editors. The Science of Self-Report: Implicationsfor Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M. The experience sampling method. In: Reis H, editor. Naturalistic Approaches to Studying Social Interaction; Vol 15. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby R, DiClemente RJ, Charnigo R, Snow G, Troutman A. A brief, clinic-based, safer sex intervention for heterosexual African American men newly diagnosed with an STD: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2009;99 Suppl 1:S96–S103.
   Google Scholar
• Jemmott LS, Jemmott JBIII, O’Leary A. Effects on sexual risk behavior and STD rate of brief HIV/STD prevention interventions for African American women in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1034–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JM Jr, et al; for Project RESPECT Study Group. Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280(13):1161–1167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolu OO, Lindsey C, Kamb ML, et al; Project RESPECT Study Group. Is HIV/sexually transmitted disease prevention counseling effective among vulnerable populations? a subset analysis of data collected for a randomized controlled trial evaluating counseling efficacy (Project RESPECT). Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(8):469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar