Advanced search
Publication Cover
Open Access Journal of Contraception Volume 12, 2021 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
227
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Informed Choice of Contraceptive Methods among Women in Ethiopia: Further Analysis of the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey

Simegnew HandeboDepartment of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, EthiopiaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-5560
ORCID Icon
Pages 83-91 | Published online: 16 Mar 2021

References

  • UNFPA. Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population Development, 20th Anniversary Edition; 2014
  • Rimon JG II, Tsui AO. Regaining momentum in family planning. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(4):626–628. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00483
  • Cleland J, Harbison S, Shah IH. Unmet need for contraception: issues and challenges. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(2):105–122. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00380.x
  • The RESPOND Project: a fine balance: contraceptive choice in the 21st century-an action agenda. Report of the September 2012 Bellagio conference. New York: Engender Health/The RESPOND Project; 2013.
  • Kim YM, Kols A, Mucheke S. Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1998;1:2–4. doi:10.2307/2991913
  • World Health Organization. Ensuring human rights within contraceptive programmes: a human rights analysis of existing quantitative indicators; 2014.
  • World Health Organization. Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations; 2014.
  • Stanback J, Steiner M, Dorflinger L, Solo J, Cates W. WHO tiered-effectiveness counseling is rights-based family planning. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(3):352–357.
  • UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4. General Comment No. 14, The right to the highest attainable standard of health; 2000
  • Loaiza E, Liang M, Snow R. Informed choice for modern contraceptive use: evidence from 24 countries served by the UNFPA supplies programme. Population Association of America meeting; March 2016.
  • PATH and United Nations Population Fund. Meeting the Need: Strengthening Family Planning Programs. Seattle: PATH/UNFPA; 2006.
  • Engender Health. Choices in family planning: informed and voluntary decision making. New York: Engender Health; 2003b. Available from: www.engenderhealth.org/res/offc/ic/choices/. Accessed February 23, 2021.
  • Fruhauf T, Zimmerman L, Kibira SP, et al. Measuring family planning quality and its link with contraceptive use in public facilities in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(7):828–839. doi:10.1093/heapol/czy058
  • DKT Ethiopia. Ethiopia family planning landscape. Available from: https://www.dktethiopia.org/sites/default/files/PublicationFiles/Ethiopia%20Landscape%20v9.2.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2021.
  • Tafese F, Woldie M, Megerssa B. Quality of family planning services in primary health centers of Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2013;23(3):245–254. doi:10.4314/ejhs.v23i3.7
  • Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF; 2016.
  • Castle S, Askew I. Contraceptive discontinuation: reasons, challenges, and solutions; 2015.
  • Mozumdar A, Gautam V, Gautam A, et al. Choice of contraceptive methods in public and private facilities in rural India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):421. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4249-0
  • World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (CCP), Knowledge for Health Project. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers (2018 Update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2018.
  • Dansereau E, Schaefer A, Hernández B, et al. Perceptions of and barriers to family planning services in the poorest regions of Chiapas, Mexico: a qualitative study of men, women, and adolescents. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):129. doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0392-4
  • Nelumbu PN, Amakali K, Hofnie-Hoëbes K. Application of elements of the informed choice of modern contraceptives among reproductive aged women in the Khomas region of Namibia. J Nursing Educ Practice. 2015;6. doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n2p130
  • Valdés PR, Alarcon AM, Munoz SR. Evaluation of Informed Choice for contraceptive methods among women attending a family planning program: conceptual development; a case study in Chile. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(3):302–307. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.003
  • Murphy E, Steele C. Client-provider interactions in family planning services: guidance from research and program experience. Maximizing Access and Quality Paper. 2000. 1(2)
  • Chekole MK, Kahsay ZH, Medhanyie AA, Gebreslassie MA, Bezabh AM. Husbands’ involvement in family planning use and its associated factors in pastoralist communities of Afar, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0697-6
  • Kim YM, Kols A, Martin A, et al. Promoting informed choice: evaluating a decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in Mexico. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2005;31(4):162–171. doi:10.1363/3116205

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.