Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths

References

• RohYRLeeSMHanYKKimMKWeeWRLeeJHIntraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyesKorean J Ophthalmol201125315115521655038
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 3: Clinical Optics (2011–2012 ed.)American Academy of Ophthalmology211223
   Google Scholar
• Duke Eye Center [home page on the Internet]Durham. Refractive cataract surgery: meeting patient expectations [updated September, 2015] Available from: http://www.dukeeyecenter.duke.edu/sites/dukeeyecenter.duke.edu/files/field/attachments/vann_axial_length_biometry_svq_2016_0.pdfAccessed August 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• OlsenTSources of error in intraocular lens power calculationJ Cataract Refract Surg19921821251291564648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeACQaziMAPeposeJSBiometry and intraocular lens power calculationCurr Opin Ophthalmol2008191131718090891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorrbySSources of error in intraocular lens power calculationJ Cataract Refract Surg200834336837618299059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HofferKJThe Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulasJ Cataract Refract Surg19931967007128271165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  Comment in
   Google Scholar
  J Cataract Refract Surg20073312 author reply 2–317189772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HofferKJClinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formulaJ Cataract Refract Surg20002681233123711008054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolladayJTPragerTCChandlerTYMusgroveKHLewisJWRuizRSA three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculationsJ Cataract Refract Surg198814117243339543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RetzlaffJASandersDRKraffMCDevelopment of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formulaJ Cataract Refract Surg19901633333402355321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  ErratumJ Cataract Refract Surg19901645282380940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  Comment in
   Google Scholar
  J Cataract Refract Surg19931934428501649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandersDRRetzlaffJAKraffMCGimbelHVRaananMGComparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulasJ Cataract Refract Surg19901633413462355322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlsenTGimbelHPhacoemulsification, capsulorhexis, and intraocular lens power prediction accuracyJ Cataract Refract Surg19931966956998271164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaigisWLegeBMillerNSchneiderBComparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to HaigisGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2000238976577311045345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AristodemouPKnox CartwrightNESparrowJMJohnstonRLFormula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T, and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometryJ Cataract Refract Surg2011371637121183100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElderMJPredicting the refractive outcome after cataract surgery: the comparison of different IOLs and SRK-II v SRK-TBr J Ophthalmol200286662062212034681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangJKChangSWOptical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengthsInt J Ophthalmol20136215015423638414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FindlOBiometry and intraocular lens power calculationCurr Opin Ophthalmol2005161616415650582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FontesBMFontesBMCastroEIntraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometryArq Bras Oftalmol201174316617021915441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlsenTImproved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMasterActa Ophthalmol Scand2007851848717244216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FindlODrexlerWMenapaceRHeinzlHHitzenbergerCKFercherAFImproved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometryJ Cataract Refract Surg200127686186711408132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EleftheriadisHIOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive casesBr J Ophthalmol200387896096312881334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GantenbeinCPRuprechtKWComparison between optical and acoustical biometryJ Fr Ophtalmol2004271011211127 French [with English abstract]15687921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KutschanAWiegandWIndividual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery – a comparison of optical and acoustical biometryKlin Monbl Augenheilkd20042219743748 German [with English abstract]15459840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakhliFRComparison of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound measurements of the axial length of the eyeSaudi J Ophthalmol201428428729125473345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FedorovSNKolinkoAIKolinkoAIEstimation of optical power of the intraocular lensVestn Oftalmol19678042731 Russian [with English abstract]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DangMSRajPPSRK II formula in the calculation of intraocular lens powerBr J Ophthalmol198973108238262818992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LagrastaJMAllemannNScapucinLClinical results in phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formulaArq Bras Oftalmol200972218919319466327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorrêaZMSKronbauerFLGoldhardtRMarconIMBakowiczFPrecisão ecobiométrica da fórmula SRK/T na facoemulsificação. [Biometric accuracy of the SRK/T formula in phacoemulsification]Arq Bras Oftalmol2001643233237 Spanish
   Google Scholar
• HubailleCDe GrootVTassignonMJComparaison entre la refraction attendue et la refraction obtenue, pour trois lentilles intra-oculaires differentes (une pliable en acrylique, une pliable en PMMA-copolymere et une non pliable en PMMA). [Comparative study of the preoperative target ametropia and the postoperative refraction, for three different lenses (one acrylic foldable lens, one foldable PMMA-Copolymere lens and one non foldable PMMA-copolymere lens)]Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol200128013542 French
   Google Scholar
• RajanMSKeilhornIBellJAPartial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculationsEye (Lond)200216555255612194067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhattABScheflerACFeuerWJYooSHMurrayTGComparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometryArch Ophthalmol2008126792993318625938
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NarváezJZimmermanGStultingRDChangDHAccuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulasJ Cataract Refract Surg200632122050205317137982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar