Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio

Tao Ming Thomas Chia1 Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Minh T Nguyen2 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

Hoon C Jung3 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, [email protected];4 Eye Clinic, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA, [email protected]Correspondence[email protected]

Pages 1757-1762 | Published online: 10 Sep 2018

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

KleinBEKleinRLeeKEIncidence of age-related cataract over a 10-year interval: the Beaver Dam Eye StudyOphthalmology2002109112052205712414414
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CongdonNVingerlingJRKleinBEPrevalence of cataract and pseudophakia/aphakia among adults in the United StatesArch Ophthalmol2004122448749415078665
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Montés-MicóRCaronesFButtacchioAFerrer-BlascoTMadrid-CostaDComparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patientsJ Refract Surg201127966567121323302
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FindlODrexlerWMenapaceRHeinzlHHitzenbergerCKFercherAFImproved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometryJ Cataract Refract Surg200127686186711408132
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DrexlerWFindlOMenapaceRPartial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgeryAm J Ophthalmol199812645245349780097
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KolegaMŠKovačevićSČanovićSPavičićADBašićJKComparison of IOL – master and ultrasound biometry in preoperative intra ocular lens (IOL) power calculationColl Antropol201539123323526040097
PubMedGoogle Scholar
HirnschallNMurphySPimenidesDMaurinoVFindlOAssessment of a new averaging algorithm to increase the sensitivity of axial eye length measurement with optical biometry in eyes with dense cataractJ Cataract Refract Surg2011371454921071170
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FreemanGPesudovsKThe impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMasterActa Ophthalmol Scand200583443944216029267
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PrinzANeumayerTBuehlWInfluence of severity of nuclear cataract on optical biometryJ Cataract Refract Surg20063271161116516857503
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
OlsenTThorwestMCalibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMasterJ Cataract Refract Surg20053171345135016105605
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RajanMSKeilhornIBellJAPartial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculationsEye200216555255612194067
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Velázquez-EstadesLJWangerAKellawayJHardtenDRPragerTCMicrobial contamination of immersion biometry ultrasound equipmentOphthalmology20051125e13e1815878049
PubMedGoogle Scholar
VerhulstEVrijghemJCAccuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective studyBull Soc Belge Ophtalmol20012812816165
Google Scholar
RoseLTMoshegovCNComparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculationClin Exp Ophthalmol200331212112412648044
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BhattABScheflerACFeuerWJYooSHMurrayTGComparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometryArch Ophthalmol2008126792993318625938
PubMedGoogle Scholar
GoebelsSCSeitzBLangenbucherAComparison of the new biometer OA-1000 with IOLMaster and Tomey AL-3000Curr Eye Res201338991091623841799
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GoebelsSCSeitzBLangenbucherAReproducibility of the optical Biometer OA-1000 (Tomey)Biomed Res Int2014201481476124818155
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GoebelsSPattmöllerMEppigTCaylessASeitzBLangenbucherAComparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patientsJ Cataract Refract Surg201541112387239326703487
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiampaZKynigopoulosMPallasGGerdingHComparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometryKlin Monbl Augenheilkd2010227428528820408075
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LegeBAHaigisWLaser interference biometry versus ultrasound biometry in certain clinical conditionsGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2004242181214648138
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
OlsenTSources of error in intraocular lens power calculationJ Cataract Refract Surg19921821251291564648
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FarhoudiDBBehndigAMontanPLundströmMZetterströmCKugelbergMSpectacle use after routine cataract surgery: a study from the Swedish National Cataract RegisterActa Ophthalmol201896328328728857438
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SrivannaboonSChirapapaisanCChonpimaiPLoketSClinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometerJ Cataract Refract Surg201541102224223226703299
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WileyWFBafnaSIntra-operative aberrometry guided cataract surgeryInt Ophthalmol Clin2011512119129
Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date