111
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Learning Curve and One-Year Outcome of XEN 45 Gel Stent Implantation in a Swedish Population

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 3719-3733 | Published online: 02 Nov 2020

References

  • Caprioli J, Kim JH, Friedman DS, et al. Special commentary: supporting innovation for safe and effective minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: summary of a joint meeting of the American Glaucoma Society and the Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, February 26, 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1795–1801. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.029
  • Buffault J, Baudouin C, Labbe A. XEN((R)) Gel Stent for management of chronic open angle glaucoma: a review of the literature. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019;42(2):e37–e46. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2018.12.002
  • Fernandez-Garcia A, Zhou Y, Garcia-Alonso M, Andrango HD, Poyales F, Garzon N. Comparing medium-term clinical outcomes following XEN(R) 45 and XEN(R) 63 device implantation. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:4796548. doi:10.1155/2020/4796548
  • Lavin-Dapena C, Cordero-Ros R, D’Anna O, Mogollon I. XEN 63 gel stent device in glaucoma surgery: a 5-years follow-up prospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;1120672120952033.
  • Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, et al. Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):983–996. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04251-z
  • Kirwan JF, Lockwood AJ, Shah P, et al. Trabeculectomy in the 21st century: a multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2532–2539. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.049
  • Grover DS, Flynn WJ, Bashford KP, et al. Performance and safety of a new ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:25–36. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.023
  • Astrom S, Stenlund H, Linden C. Incidence and prevalence of pseudoexfoliations and open-angle glaucoma in northern Sweden: II. Results after 21 years of follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(8):832–837. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00980.x
  • Mansouri K, Gillmann K, Rao HL, Guidotti J, Mermoud A. Prospective evaluation of XEN gel implant in eyes with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):869–873. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001045
  • Gillmann K, Bravetti GE, Mermoud A, Rao HL, Mansouri K. XEN gel stent in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma: two-year results of a prospective evaluation. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(8):676–684. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001295
  • Lenzhofer M, Strohmaier C, Sperl P, et al. Effect of the outer stent position on efficacy after minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(8):e1105–e1111. doi:10.1111/aos.14167
  • Tan SZ, Walkden A, Au L. One-year result of XEN45 implant for glaucoma: efficacy, safety, and postoperative management. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(2):324–332. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.162
  • Vera V, Sheybani A, Lindfield D, Stalmans I, Ahmed IIK. Recommendations for the management of elevated intraocular pressure due to bleb fibrosis after XEN gel stent implantation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:685–694. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S195457
  • Zetterstrom C, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Lundstrom M. Changes in intraocular pressure after cataract surgery: analysis of the Swedish National Cataract Register Data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1725–1729. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.054
  • De Gregorio A, Pedrotti E, Russo L, Morselli S. Minimally invasive combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: clinical results of the smallest ab interno gel stent. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):1129–1134. doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0571-x
  • Hengerer FH, Kohnen T, Mueller M, Conrad-Hengerer I. Ab interno gel implant for the treatment of glaucoma patients with or without prior glaucoma surgery: 1-year results. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(12):1130–1136. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000803
  • Widder RA, Dietlein TS, Dinslage S, Kuhnrich P, Rennings C, Rossler G. The XEN45 gel stent as a minimally invasive procedure in glaucoma surgery: success rates, risk profile, and rates of re-surgery after 261 surgeries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(4):765–771. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-3899-7