139
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Central Macular Thickness in a Healthy Mexican Population Using Huvitz Optical Coherence Tomography

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3931-3940 | Published online: 17 Nov 2020

References

  • Nussenblatt RB, Kaufman SC, Palestine AG, Davis MD, Ferris FL. Macular thickening and visual acuity. Measurement in patients with cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(9):1134–1139. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(87)33314-7
  • Shahidi M, Ogura Y, Blair NP, Rusin MM, Zeimer R. Retinal thickness analysis for quantitative assessment of diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(8):1115–1119. doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080075032
  • Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–1181. doi:10.1126/science.1957169
  • Sull AC, Vuong LN, Price LL, et al. Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2010;30(2):235–245. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bd2c3b
  • Appukuttan B, Giridhar A, Gopalakrishnan M, Sivaprasad S. Normative spectral domain optical coherence tomography data on macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Indians. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(3):316–321. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.116466
  • Al-Zamil WM, Al-Zwaidi FM, Yassin SA. Macular thickness in healthy Saudi adults. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(1):63–69. doi:10.15537/smj.2017.1.17565
  • Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Fujimoto JG, et al. Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1734–1746. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.023
  • Asefzadeh B, Cavallerano AA, Fisch BM. Racial differences in macular thickness in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(10):E941–5. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318157a6a0
  • Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: advantages and advances. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(6):556–579. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.05.005
  • Wong ACM, Chan CWN, Hui SP. Relationship of gender, body mass index, and axial length with central retinal thickness using optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond). 2005;19(3):292–297. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701466
  • Grover S, Murthy RK, Brar VS, Chalam KV. Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis). Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(2):266–271. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.006
  • Song WK, Lee SC, Lee ES, Kim CY, Kim SS. Macular thickness variations with sex, age, and axial length in healthy subjects: a spectral domain-optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):3913–3918. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4189
  • Mitkova-Hristova VT, Konareva-Kostyaneva MI. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using spectral optical coherence tomography. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2011;53(4):28–33. doi:10.2478/v10153-011-0064-z
  • Adhi M, Aziz S, Muhammad K, Adhi MI. Macular thickness by age and gender in healthy eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2012;7(5).
  • Choovuthayakorn J, Watanachai N, Chaikitmongkol V, Patikulsila D, Kunavisarut P, Ittipunkul N. Macular thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in healthy Thai eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56(6):569–576.doi:10.1007/s10384-012-0192-x
  • Solé González L, Abreu González R, Alonso Plasencia M, Abreu Reyes P. [Normal macular thickness and volume using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in a reference population]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2013;88(9):352–358. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2013.01.005. [Article in Spanish].
  • Natung T, Keditsu A, Lyngdoh LA, Dkhar B, Prakash G. Normal macular thickness in healthy Indian eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016;5(3):176–179.doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000153
  • Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, et al. Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(6):815–824. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.025
  • Pokharel A, Shrestha GS, Shrestha JB. Macular thickness and macular volume measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal Nepalese eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:511–519. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S95956
  • Pierro L, Giatsidis SM, Mantovani E, Gagliardi M. Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(2):199–204.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015
  • Domínguez-Vicent A, Brautaset R, Venkataraman AP, Lewin AS. Repeatability of quantitative measurements of retinal layers with SD-OCT and agreement between vertical and horizontal scan protocols in healthy eyes. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221466. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221466
  • Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group; Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs–an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5):786–806. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38012-9
  • Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(11):4893–4897. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1326
  • Sander B, Al-Abiji HA, Kofod M, Jørgensen TM. Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(11):1915–1921. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3075-2
  • Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z, et al. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in normal eyes with the Stratus OCT, the Cirrus HD-OCT, and the Topcon 3D OCT-1000. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(2):118–125. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d786f8
  • Alvarez-Celorio M, de Los D, Fromow-Guerra J, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, Quiroz-Mercado H. Correlación entre grosor macular y capacidad visual en pacientes con retinopatía diabética y edema macular clínicamente significativo. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2004;78(5):230–236.[Article in Spanish]
  • Chauhan DS, Marshall J. The interpretation of optical coherence tomography images of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(10):2332–2342.
  • Tan CSH, Cheong KX, Lim LW, Li KZ. Topographic variation of choroidal and retinal thicknesses at the macula in healthy adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(3):339–344. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304000
  • Mehta N, Waheed NK. Diversity in optical coherence tomography normative databases: moving beyond race. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020;6.
  • Lim MCC, Hoh S-T, Foster PJ, et al. Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(3):974–978. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0828
  • Tewari HK, Wagh VB, Sony P, Venkatesh P, Singh R. Macular thickness evaluation using the optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004;52(3):199–204.
  • Lima-Gómez V. Comparación del grosor macular con y sin edema en pacientes diabéticos mexicanos. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2007;81(4):214–218.[Article in Spanish].
  • Lima-Gómez V, Blanco-Hernández DMR. Valor esperado del grosor foveal en mexicanos diabéticos con edema macular. Cir Cir. 2012;80(2):109–114.[Article in Spanish].