A Review on Different Tonometers for Intraocular Pressure Measurement After Photorefractive Keratectomy or Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

References

• Casas Luque L, Naidoo K, Chan VF, et al. Prevalence of refractive error, presbyopia, and spectacle coverage in Bogotá, Colombia: a rapid assessment of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(8):579–586. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harb EN, Wildsoet CF. Origins of refractive errors: environmental and genetic factors. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2019;5:47–72. 1 doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-015027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadea L, Giovannetti F. Main complications of photorefractive keratectomy and their management. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2305–2315. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S233125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AHY, Cheung RKY, Kua WN, Shih KC, Chan TCY, Wan KH. Dry eyes after SMILE. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8(5):397–405. doi:10.1097/01.APO.0000580136.80338.d0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihota R, Angmo D, Ramaswamy D, Dada T. Simplifying “target” intraocular pressure for different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(4):495–505. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1130_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang KJ, Wang WW, Tsai CL, Wang IJ. Intraocular pressure changes in eyes with small incision lenticules and laser in situ keratomileusis. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(4):399–405. doi:10.1111/cxo.12861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai AS, Loon SC. Intraocular pressure assessment after laser in situ keratomileusis: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(3):295–304. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(3):471–479. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, Kagemann L, Harris A. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea. 2001;20(1):33–36. doi:10.1097/00003226-200101000-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper I, Senn P, Oyo-Szerenyi K, Peter R. Central and peripheral pressure measurements with the Goldmann tonometer and tono-pen after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(6):929–933. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00461-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy Y, Zadok D, Glovinsky Y, Krakowski D, Nemet P. Tono-pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(4):486–491. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(99)80044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed-Azzam S, Briscoe D, Tomkins O, Shehedeh-Mashor R, Garzozi H. Evaluation of intraocular pressure according to corneal thickness before and after excimer laser corneal ablation for myopia. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(4):349–354. doi:10.1007/s10792-012-9701-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadigh AL, Fouladi RF, Hashemi H, Beheshtnejad AH. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(2):603–608. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2142-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza M, Iaccarino S, Mele L, et al. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(2):154–159. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszkowska AM, De Grazia L, Cirone M, Ferreri G. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses. Ophthalmologica. 2009;223(4):244–249. doi:10.1159/000209253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(5):767–773. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1431-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landoulsi H, Saad A, Haddad NN, Guilbert E, Gatinel D. Repeatability of ocular response analyzer waveform parameters in normal eyes and eyes after refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(10):709–714. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130919-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrelli C, Giudiceandrea A, Vaiano AS, Caputo CG, Gullà F, Salgarello T. Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3208–3213. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, Bianco S, Sebastiani A. Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211(6):341–343. doi:10.1159/000310825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montés-Micó R, Charman WN. Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(3):228–235. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00581.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Pan C, Li L, Ding J. Correlations between factors and intraocular pressure following photorefractive keratectomy. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1998;34(5):385–387.
   Google Scholar
• Cernák A, Sisková E, Durcová T, Cernák M. Is it possible to accurately measure intraocular pressure after refractive surgery?. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2003;59(6):397–401.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Shah S, Bessant DA, Naroo SA, Doyle SJ. Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(3):355–359. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30308-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasoglu OE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(12):2193–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn IK, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H, Moon CH. Validity of tono-pachymetry for measuring corrected intraocular pressure in non-surgical and post-photorefractive keratectomy eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(1):44–51. doi:10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.44
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1495–1503. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Stojanovic A, Hua Y, et al. Reliability of corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyser measurements in virgin and post-PRK eyes. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109577. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan Z, Modis L Jr, Szalai E, Berta A, Nemeth G. Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(5):337–341. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munger R, Hodge WG, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos PJ, Jackson WB, Damji KF. Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998;33(3):159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW, Whitacre MM, Siegmund KD. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):945–948. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30202-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munger R, Dohadwala AA, Hodge WG, Jackson WB, Mintsioulis G, Damji KF. Changes in measured intraocular pressure after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(8):1254–1262. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00971-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa N, Cennamo G, Breve MA, La Rana A. Goldmann applanation tonometry after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76(5):550–554. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760508.x
   Google Scholar
• Gimeno JA, Muñoz LA, Valenzuela LA, Moltó FJ, Rahhal MS. Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2000;19(4):512–516. doi:10.1097/00003226-200007000-00022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F, Jin X, Xu Y, Yang Y. Treatment of corneal perforation with lenticules from small incision lenticule extraction surgery: a preliminary study of 6 patients. Cornea. 2015;34(6):658–663. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucher A, Grégoire J, Blondeau P. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23(6):832–838. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80239-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburrelli C, Vaiano AS, Salgarello T, Caputo CG, Scullica L. Tonometric changes of latanoprost-induced intraocular pressure reduction after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(3):846–850. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare M, Feizi S, Azimzadeh A, Esfandiari H. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(6):457–462. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.660594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lopes BT, Huang W, et al. Effectiveness of four tonometers in measuring intraocular pressure following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE and transepithelial PRK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedberg H, Chen E, Hamberg-Nyström H. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(12):1218–1220. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0072-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosny M, Aboalazayem F, El Shiwy H, Salem M. Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1309–1314. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S132578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wang Y, Dou R, et al. Intraocular pressure changes and relationship with corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(10):4180–4186. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Su X, Liu X, Miao H, Fang X, Zhou X. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and Corvis Scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):205. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0381-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KJ, Joda A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):581–588. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefat SM, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Mayer WJ, Kampik A, Kook D. Evaluation of changes in human corneas after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using non-contact tonometry and ultra-high-speed camera (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(7):917–922. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1082185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen IB, Bak-Nielsen S, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(8):1329–1335. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Martínez J, Tauste A, Piñero DP. Corneal thickness after SMILE affects scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):821–828. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160816-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L, Calienno R, Lanzini M, et al. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties modification after small incision lenticule extraction using Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:290619. doi:10.1155/2014/290619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CJ, Wang Y, Su XL, Wu WJ, Wu ZQ, Wu YN An analysis of changes in posterior corneal elevation and relevant factors after small incision lenticule extraction. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;52(7):494–498.
   Google Scholar
• Fu D, Li M, Knorz MC, Wei S, Shang J, Zhou X. Intraocular pressure changes and corneal biomechanics after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):129. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01384-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Liu S, Huang P, Wang P. Analysis of intraocular pressure after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002;38(10):603–605.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Weber P, Nagaoka N, Ohno-Matsui K. Glaucoma in high myopia and parapapillary delta zone. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet.2017;390(10108):2183–2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerlöf O. Airpuff tonometry versus applanation tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990;68(2):221–224. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1990.tb01909.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar