Results of a Glaucoma Shared Care Model Using the Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System and Disc Damage Likelihood Scale with a Novel Scoring Scheme in New Zealand

References

• World Glaucoma Association [homepage on the Internet]. What is Glaucoma?; 2020. Available from: https://wga.one/wga/what-is-glaucoma/. Accessed June 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [homepage on the Internet]. Blindness and Visual Impairment; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/blindness-and-vision-loss#tab=tab_1. Accessed June 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Blind Low Vision New Zealand [homepage on the Internet]. Blindness and low vision in New Zealand latest statistics; 2015. Available from: https://blindlowvision.org.nz/information/statistics-and-research/. Accessed June 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Health [homepage on the Internet]. O’Rourke M, Frederikson L, Jacobs R, et al. Eye health workforce service review; 2011. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/pages/eye-health-review-may-2011.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon SA, Adair A. Shared care in glaucoma: a national study of secondary care lead schemes in England. Eye. 2010;24:265–269. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Garway-Heath DF, Leung C, Crowston JG, Medeiros FA. WGA Consensus Series 8 Progression of Glaucoma. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa [homepage on the Internet]. Census population and dwelling counts; 2018. Available from: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2018-census-population-and-dwelling-counts. Accessed June 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for Glaucoma Progression and the effect of treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48–56. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714–720. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7 The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:429–440. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00538-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures (NTGS). Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:487–497. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00223-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnu P-A, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath DF. A Comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:847–850. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.056614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Geiser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:134–142. doi:10.1097/00061198-200004000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disc damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:44–48. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01833-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara-Jose AC, Melo LAS Jr, Esporcatte BLB, Endo ATNH, Leite MT, Tavares IM. The disc damage likelihood scale: diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusini P, Filacordia S. Enhanced glaucoma staging system (GSS2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:40–46. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard Operating Procedures for Health and Disability Ethics Committees [homepage on the Internet]. Auckland: Health and Disability Commissioner; 2019. Available from: https://ethics.health.govt.nz/operating-procedures. Accessed December 12, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights [homepage on the Internet]. Auckland: Health and Disability Commissioner; 1996. Available from: https://www.hdc.org.nz/your-rights/about-the-code/code-of-health-and-disability-services-consumers-rights/. Accessed December 12, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders LJ, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM. What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant? Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11:227–234. doi:10.1080/17469899.2016.1180246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocak I, Zulauf M, Bergamin O. Evaluation of the Brusini glaucoma staging system for typing and staging of perimetric results. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212:221–227. doi:10.1159/000027296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho S, Vernon SA. Decision making in chronic glaucoma - optometrists vs ophthalmologists in a shared care service. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31:168–173. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banes MJ, Culham LE, Bunce C, Xing W, Viswanathan A, Garway-Heath D. Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:579–585. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.082388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks JR, Harding AK, Harper RA, et al. Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients. Eye. 2012;26:853–861. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheetz J, Koklanis K, Long M, Lawler K, Karimi L, Morris ME. Validity and reliability of eye healthcare professionals in the assessment of glaucoma - a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:689–702. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho K, Stapleton F, Wiles L, et al. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:646. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4493-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford BK, Angell B, Liew G, White AJR, Keay LJ. Improving patient access and reducing costs for glaucoma with integrated hospital and community care: a case study from Australia. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19:5. doi:10.5334/ijic.4642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar