168
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Normal Ocular Protrusion Values in South Indian Population and Effect of Age, Gender and Refractive Status on Ocular Protrusion

&
Pages 1445-1451 | Published online: 09 Apr 2021

References

  • Duke-Elder WS. The ocular adnexa. In: Duke-Elder WS, editor. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 13. Mosby; 1974.
  • Chan W, Simon NM, Tissa S, et al. Exopthalmometric values and their biometric correlates: the Kandy Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(5):496–502. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02087.x
  • Bilen H, Gullulu G, Akcay G. Exophthalmometric values in a normal Turkish population living in northeast part of Turkey. Thyroid. 2007;17(6):525–528. doi:10.1089/thy.2006.0279
  • Beden U, Ozarslan Y, Ozturk HE, Sonmez B, Erkan D, Oge I. Exophthalmometry values of Turkish adult population and the effect of age, sex, refractive status, and Hertel base values on Hertel readings. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18(2):165–171. doi:10.1177/112067210801800201
  • Segni M, Bartley G, Garrity JA, Bergstralh EJ, Gorman CA. Comparability of proptosis measurements by different techniques. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(6):813–818. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01429-0
  • Onofrey BE. Ocular Therapeutics Handbook: A Clinical Manual. 3rd ed. Onofrey BE, editor. Philadelphia:Wolters Kluwer, Lipponcott Williams; 2011.
  • Chang AA, Bank A, Francis IC, Kappagoda MB. Clinical exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Lued And Hertel exophthalmometer. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1995;23(4):315–318. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00182.x
  • Cole HP, Couvillion JT, Fink AJ, Haik BG, Kastl PR. Exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Naugle and Hertel instruments. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13(3):189–194. doi:10.1097/00002341-199709000-00005
  • Kashkouli MB, Nojomi M, Paravaresh MM, Sanjari MS, Modarres M, Nooranj MM. Normal values of hertel exophthalmometry in children, teenagers,and adults from Tehran, Iran. Opt Vis Sci. 2008;85(10):1012–1017. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181890dc7
  • Migliori ME, Gladstone GJ. Determination of the normal range of exophthalmometric values for black and white adults. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(4):438–442. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(84)90127-2
  • Dunsky IL. Normative data for Hertel’s exophthalmometry in a normal adult black population. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(7):562. doi:10.1097/00006324-199207000-00009
  • Wu D, Xin L, Wu D, et al. Normal values of Hertel exophthalmometry in a Chinese Han population from Shenyang, Northeast China. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):8526. doi:10.1038/srep08526
  • Quant JR, Woo GC. Normal values of eye position in the Chinese population of Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(2):152–158. doi:10.1097/00006324-199202000-00009
  • Fledilius HC, Stubgaard M. Changes in ey position during growth with an adult life. Acta Ophthalmol. 1986;64(5):481–486. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1986.tb06958.x
  • Bolonos GMF, Rezresinas FF, Rodriguez Garcia M, Gonzalez Ortiz M. Exophthalmometry in Mexican adults. Rev Invest Clin. 1999;51(6):341–343.
  • Nath K, Gogi R, Rao GS, Krishna G, Zaidi N. Normal exophthalmometry. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1977;25(3):47–52. doi:10.1016/0065-2571(75)90028-x
  • Sodhi PK, Gupta VP, Pandey RM. Exophthalmometric values in a normal Indian population. Orbit. 2001;20(1):1–9. doi:10.1076/orbi.20.1.1.2647
  • Mourits MP, Lombardo SH, van der Slujis FA, Flenton S. Reliability of exophthalmos measurement and the exophthalmometry value distribution in a healthy Dutch population and in Graves’patients. An exploratory study. Orbit. 2004;23(3):147–151. doi:10.1080/01676830490504089
  • Kim IT, Choi BJ. Normal range of exophthalmos values on orbit computerized tomography in Koreans. Ophthalmologica. 2001;215(3):156–162. doi:10.1159/000050850