Preliminary Surgical Outcomes of a Trimmed-Plate Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Implant (AADI) in Eyes at High Risk of Hypotony

References

• Mandal AK, Senthil S, et al. Childhood Glaucoma Surgery in Developing Countries. In Grajewski A, Bitrian E, Papadopoulos M, editors. Surgical Management of Childhood Glaucoma. Springer, Cham; 2018. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Budenz DL, Barton K, Gedde SJ, et al. Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(2):308–316. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi SG, Seth NG, Kaur S, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant versus Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma: a pilot study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(11):1580–1585. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_427_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandav SS, Seth NG, Thattaruthody F, et al. Long-term outcome of low-cost glaucoma drainage device (Aurolab aqueous drainage implant) compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(4):557–562. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-313942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrommatis MA, Dangda S, Sidoti PA, et al. Downsizing a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant For the Management of Persistent Postoperative Hypotony: a Case Series. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(11):1019–1022. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PP. Truncation of In Situ Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Device for Treatment of Late Persistent Postoperative Hypotony. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(2):e113–e14. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt MT, LaBree LD, Lloyd MA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the 350-mm2 versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant: longer term results: is bigger better? Ophthalmology. 1999;106(12):2312–2318. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90532-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner BS, Smith DW, Coote M, et al. Computational modeling of fluid flow and intra-ocular pressure following glaucoma surgery. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):45. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(10):1512–1519. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31772-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):1089–1098. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rateb MF, Eldaly ZH, Soliman WM. Early weaning versus prolonged administration of aqueous suppressants for prevention of hyperencapsulation in paediatric Ahmed glaucoma valve. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(1):e101–e06. doi:10.1111/aos.14220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. The tube versus trabeculectomy study: design and baseline characteristics of study patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(2):275–287. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakis PG, Tsai JC, Zurakowski D, et al. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: design, baseline patient characteristics, and intraoperative complications. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(11):2172–2179. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budenz DL, Barton K, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):443–452. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):9–22. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Kataria P, Raj S, et al. Safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device for refractory childhood glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(12):1623–1627. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosentreter A, Gaki S, Lappas A, et al. Previous cyclodestruction is a risk factor for late-onset hypotony and suprachoroidal haemorrhage after glaucoma drainage device surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(6):715–719. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon HJ, Kong YXG, Tao LW, et al. Surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage implant for uveitic glaucoma and relationship with uveitis activity. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;45(5):472–480. doi:10.1111/ceo.12916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balekudaru S, Basu T, Sen P, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of management of delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage following Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):115–120. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rateb MF, Abdel Motaal H, Shehata M, et al. Outcome of a Low-Cost Glaucoma Implant versus the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant for Paediatric Glaucoma in a Tertiary Hospital in Egypt. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5134190. doi:10.1155/2019/5134190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WC, Kristoffersen CJ, Demos CM, et al. Incidence of conjunctival exposure following drainage device implantation in patients with glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20(1):124–130. doi:10.1177/112067211002000117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson JD, Giangiacomo AL, Beck AD, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices: risk of exposure and infection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(3):516–21.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Beishri AS, Malik R, Freidi A, et al. Risk Factors for Glaucoma Drainage Device Exposure in a Middle-Eastern Population. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(6):529–534. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edo A, Jian K, Kiuchi Y. Risk factors for exposure of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants: a case-control study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):364. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01632-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar