References
- Steren BJ, Young B, Chow J. Visual acuity testing for telehealth using mobile applications. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(3):344–347. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6177
- Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone-based visual acuity test (Peek Acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):930–937. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468
- Thirunavukarasu AJ, Mullinger D, Rufus-Toye RM, Farrell S, Allen LE. Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity. Eye (Lond). 2021;30:1–5. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01760-2
- Hazel CA, Elliott DB. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12):788–792. doi:10.1097/00006324-200212000-00011
- Horner DG, Paul AD, Katz B, Bedell HE. Variations in the slope of the psychometric acuity function with acuity threshold and scale. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62(12):895–900. doi:10.1097/00006324-198512000-00011
- Cotter SA, Chu RH, Chandler DL, et al. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(4):655–661. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00388-x
- Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL 3rd. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(2):194–205. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01825-1
- McClenaghan N, Kimura A, Stark LR. An evaluation of the M&S technologies smart system II for visual acuity measurement in young visually normal adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(3):218–223. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180339f30
- Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(8):2639–2648. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0141
- Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(2):422–432.
- Manny RE, Hussein M, Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle W; COMET Study Group. Repeatability of e-ETDRS visual acuity in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(8):3294–3300. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-1199
- Black JM, Jacobs RJ, Phillips G, et al. An assessment of the iPad as a testing platform for distance visual acuity in adults. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002730. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002730
- Kawamoto K, Stanojcic N, Li JO, Thomas PBM. Visual acuity apps for rapid integration in teleconsultation services in all resource settings: a review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021;10(4):350–354. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000384
- Claessens JLJ, Geuvers JR, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Digital tools for the self-assessment of visual acuity: a systematic review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;25:1–16. doi:10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3
- Kaiser PK. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of Snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (an aos thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:311–324.
- Norgett Y, Siderov J. Crowding in children’s visual acuity tests–effect of test design and age. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(8):920–927. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821bd2d3
- Flom MC, Heath GG, Takahashi E. Contour interaction and visual resolution: contralateral effects. Science. 1963;142(3594):979–980. doi:10.1126/science.142.3594.979
- Flom MC. Contour interaction and the crowding effect. Probl Optom. 1991;3:237–257.