181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Impact of Primary Needling on the XEN Implant Clinical Outcomes: A Real-Life Retrospective Study

, , &
Pages 935-946 | Published online: 28 Mar 2022

References

  • Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
  • Pillunat LE, Erb C, Jünemann AG, Kimmich F. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1583–1600. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S135316
  • Shah M. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery - an interventional glaucoma evolution. Eye Vis. 2019;6:29. doi:10.1186/s40662-019-0154-1
  • Nichani P, Popovic MM, Schlenker MB, Park J, Ahmed IIK. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a review of 3476 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66(5):714–742. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.09.005
  • Laborda-Guirao T, Cubero-Parra JM, Hidalgo-Torres A. Efficacy and safety of XEN 45 gel stent alone or in combination with phacoemulsification in advanced open angle glaucoma patients: 1-year retrospective study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(8):1250–1256. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.08.11
  • Grover DS, Flynn WJ, Bashford KP, et al. Performance and safety of a new ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:25–36. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.023
  • Hengerer FH, Kohnen T, Mueller M, Conrad-Hengerer I. Ab interno gel implant for the treatment of glaucoma patients with or without prior glaucoma surgery: 1-year results. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(12):1130–1136. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000803
  • Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, et al. Efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of standalone ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11):1579–1588. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.004
  • Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, Lenzhofer M, Barton K, Stalmans I; Apex Study Group. Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):983–996. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04251-z
  • Marcos Parra MT, Salinas López JA, López Grau NS, Ceausescu AM, Pérez Santonja JJ. XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(8):1741–1750. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04341-y
  • Karimi A, Lindfield D, Turnbull A, et al. A multi-centre interventional case series of 259 ab-interno Xen gel implants for glaucoma, with and without combined cataract surgery. Eye. 2019;33(3):469–477. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0243-8
  • Lenzhofer M, Kersten-Gomez I, Sheybani A, et al. Four-year results of a minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation in a prospective multi-centre study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47(5):581–587. doi:10.1111/ceo.13463
  • Ibáñez-Muñoz A, Soto-Biforcos VS, Rodríguez-Vicente L, et al. XEN implant in primary and secondary open-angle glaucoma: A12-month retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(5):1034–1041. doi:10.1177/1120672119845226
  • Panarelli JF, Yan DB, Francis B, Craven ER. XEN gel stent open conjunctiva technique: a practical approach paper. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):2538–2549. doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01278-1
  • Vera V, Gagne S, Myers JS, Ahmed IIK. Surgical approaches for implanting Xen gel stent without conjunctival dissection. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2361–2371. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S265695
  • Tan NE, Tracer N, Terraciano A, Parikh HA, Panarelli JF, Radcliffe NM. Comparison of safety and efficacy between ab interno and ab externo approaches to XEN gel stent placement. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:299–305. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S292007
  • Midha N, Gillmann K, Chaudhary A, Mermoud A, Mansouri K. Efficacy of needling revision after XEN gel stent implantation: a prospective study. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(1):11–14. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001394
  • Feldman RM, Tabet RR. Needle revision of filtering blebs. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(7):594–600. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318181283e
  • Kerr NM, Lim S, Simos M, Ward T. Primary needling of the ab interno gelatin microstent reduces postoperative needling and follow-up requirements. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021;4(6):581–588. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.02.004
  • Cantor LB, Mantravadi A, WuDunn D, Swamynathan K, Cortes A. Morphologic classification of filtering blebs after glaucoma filtration surgery: the Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(3):266–271. doi:10.1097/00061198-200306000-00015
  • Hodapp E, Parrish R, Anderson D. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 1993.
  • Midha N, Rao HL, Mermoud A, Mansouri K. Identifying the predictors of needling after XEN gel implant. Eye. 2019;33(3):353–357. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0206-0
  • Vera V, Sheybani A, Lindfield D, Stalmans I, Ahmed IIK. Recommendations for the management of elevated intraocular pressure due to bleb fibrosis after XEN gel stent implantation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:685–694. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S195457
  • Wilkins M, Indar A, Wormald R. Intra-operative mitomycin C for glaucoma surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD002897.
  • Holló G. Wound healing and glaucoma surgery: modulating the scarring process with conventional antimetabolites and new molecules. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;59:80–89.
  • Lewczuk K, Konopińska J, Jabłońska J, et al. XEN Glaucoma Implant for the Management of Operated Uncontrolled Glaucoma: results and Complications during a Long-Term Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:2321922. doi:10.1155/2021/2321922
  • Lewczuk K, Konopińska J, Jabłońska J, et al. XEN glaucoma implant for the management of glaucoma in NaïvePatients versus patients with previous glaucoma surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4417. doi:10.3390/jcm10194417