Interim Analysis of STREAMLINE^® Surgical System Clinical Outcomes in Eyes with Glaucoma

References

• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:189–206. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S80490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari E. An update on implants for Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS). Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6(2):233–241. doi:10.1007/s40123-017-0098-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillunat LE, Erb C, Junemann AG, Kimmich F. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1583–1600. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S135316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streamline Surgical System. Instructions for Use. Rancho Cucamonga, CA: New World Medical; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Grant WM. Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;69(6):783–801. doi:10.1001/archopht.1963.00960040789022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maepea O, Bill A. Pressures in the juxtacanalicular tissue and Schlemm’s canal in monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 1992;54(6):879–883. doi:10.1016/0014-4835(92)90151-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan J, Cassidy PS, Humphries P. Open-angle glaucoma: therapeutically targeting the extracellular matrix of the conventional outflow pathway. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21(11):1037–1050. doi:10.1080/14728222.2017.1386174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Sanchez GJ, Escobar Del Pozo C, Rocha Medina JA. Numerical model of aqueous humor drainage: effects of collector channel position. Med Eng Phys. 2019;65:24–30. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allingham RR, de Kater AW, Ethier CR. Schlemm’s canal and primary open angle glaucoma: correlation between Schlemm’s canal dimensions and outflow facility. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62(1):101–109. doi:10.1006/exer.1996.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista SA, Lu Z, Hofmann S, Freddo T, Overby DR, Gong H. Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5346–5352. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit BA, Johnstone MA. Effects of viscoelastic injection into Schlemm’s canal in primate and human eyes: potential relevance to viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):786–792. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)01006-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):459–467. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR Jr., Lubeck DM, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled pivotal trial of an Ab interno implanted trabecular micro-bypass in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(6):811–821. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A Schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg S, Ammar DA, Goldberg D, Seibold LK, Porteous E, Kahook M Histological analysis of a novel dual-port microcatheter used to target the conventional aqueous outflow pathway via an Ab-interno approach. American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Annual Meeting. Washington DC; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes T, Traynor M. Clinical results of Ab interno canaloplasty in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3641–3650. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S275087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ondrejka S, Korber N. 360 degrees Ab-interno Schlemm’s canal viscodilation in primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1235–1246. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S203917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracer N, Dickerson JE Jr., Radcliffe NM. Circumferential viscodilation Ab interno combined with phacoemulsification for treatment of open-angle glaucoma: 12-month outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1357–1364. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S252965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillmann K, Aref A, Niegowski LJ, Baumgartner JM. Combined Ab interno viscocanaloplasty (ABiC) in open-angle glaucoma: 12-month outcomes. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(10):3295–3301. doi:10.1007/s10792-021-01891-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerounian S, Zimbelmann M, Lortscher M, Hommayda S, Tsirkinidou I, Muller M. Canaloplasty Ab interno (AbiC) - 2-Year-results of a novel Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) Technique. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020;238(10):1113–1119. doi:10.1055/a-1250-8431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids AM, Pahlitzsch M, Boeker A, Winterhalter S, Maier-Wenzel AK, Klamann M. Ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC)-12-month results of a new minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(9):1947–1953. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04366-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Supnet RA, Ahmed IIK. Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal for open-angle glaucoma: Ab-interno vs Ab-externo canaloplasty with tensioning suture. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2493–2498. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S178962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Supnet RA, Ahmed IIK. Viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal for the reduction of IOP via an Ab-interno approach. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2149–2155. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S177597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ. 24-month efficacy of viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal and the distal outflow system with iTrack Ab-interno canaloplasty for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1591–1599. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S272506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Realini T, Gupta PK, Radcliffe NM, et al. The effects of glaucoma and glaucoma therapies on corneal endothelial cell density. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(3):209–218. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lass JH, Benetz BA, He J, et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss and morphometric changes 5 years after phacoemulsification with or without cypass micro-stent. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;208:211–218. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Walters TR, Kolko M, et al. Phase 3, randomized, 20-month study of bimatoprost implant in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension (ARTEMIS 1). Ophthalmology. 2020;127(12):1627–1641. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premarket studies of implantable Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical (MIGS) devices: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff; 2015. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/90950/download. Accessed March 17, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong JJ, Wasiuta T, Kiatos E, Malvankar-Mehta M, Hutnik CM. The effects of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure and topical medication use in patients with glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-year data. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(6):511–522. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar