191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Sulcus Intraocular Lens with an Extended Depth of Focus

Pages 1861-1869 | Published online: 09 Jun 2022

References

  • Donoso R, Rodríguez A. Piggyback implantation using the AMO array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(9):1506–1510. PMID: 11566539. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00862-8
  • Gerten G, Kermani O, Schmiedt K, Farvili E, Foerster A, Oberheide U. Dual intraocular lens implantation: monofocal lens in the bag and additional diffractive multifocal lens in the sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(12):2136–2143. PMID: 19969220. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.014
  • Gayton JL, Apple DJ, Peng Q, et al. Interlenticular opacification: clinicopathological correlation of a complication of posterior chamber piggyback intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(3):330–336. PMID: 10713224. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00433-2
  • Chang SH, Lim G. Secondary pigmentary glaucoma associated with piggyback intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(10):2219–2222. PMID: 15474839. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.03.034
  • Iwase T, Tanaka N. Elevated intraocular pressure in secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(9):1821–1823. PMID: 16246790. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.034
  • Vounotrypidis E, Schuster I, Mackert MJ, Kook D, Priglinger S, Wolf A. Secondary intraocular lens implantation: a large retrospective analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(1):125–134. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-4178-3
  • Hassan AH, Sayed KM, ElAgooz M, Elhawary AM. Refractive results: safety and efficacy of secondary piggyback Sensar™ AR40 intraocular lens implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive error. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:4505812. PMID: 27313869; PMCID: PMC4904093. doi:10.1155/2016/4505812
  • Karjou Z, Jafarinasab MR, Seifi MH, Hassanpour K, Kheiri B. Secondary piggyback intraocular lens for management of residual ametropia after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021;16(1):12–20. PMID: 33520123; PMCID: PMC7841270. doi:10.18502/jovr.v16i1.8244
  • Gundersen KG, Potvin R. A review of results after implantation of a secondary intraocular lens to correct residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1791–1796. PMID:29042749; PMCID: PMC5633306. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S144675
  • Ferreira TB, Pinheiro J. Clinical results with a supplementary toric intraocular lens for the correction of astigmatism in pseudophakic patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(4):302–308. PMID: 25633616. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000564
  • Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Refractive and visual outcomes after implantation of a secondary toric sulcus intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1337–1342. PMID: 32546940; PMCID: PMC7244900. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S255725
  • McLintock CA, McKelvie J, Gatzioufas Z, Wilson JJ, Stephensen DC, Apel AJG. Outcomes of toric supplementary intraocular lenses for residual astigmatic refractive error in pseudophakic eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(9):1965–1972. PMID: 30374760. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-1027-7
  • McLintock CA, McKelvie J, Niyazmand H, Apel AJ. Outcomes of a toric monofocal piggyback intraocular lens for residual astigmatic refractive error in pseudophakic eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2021:1–7. PMID: 34906017. doi:10.1080/02713683.2021.2007534
  • Cassagne M, Porterie M, Gauthier L, et al. Primary sulcus implantation of a diffractive multifocal pseudophakic piggyback intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(3):266–273. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.019
  • Schrecker J, Langenbucher A. Visual performance in the long term with secondary add-on versus primary capsular bag multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(11):742–747. PMID: 27824377. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160630-02
  • Liekfeld A, Ehmer A, Schröter U. Visual function and reading speed after bilateral implantation of 2 types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: add-on versus capsular bag design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2107–2114. PMID: 26703286. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.055
  • Pedrotti E, Chierego C, Talli PM, et al. Extended depth of focus versus monofocal IOLs: objective and subjective visual outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):214–222. PMID: 32267951. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200212-01
  • Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Assia EI, Kleinmann G. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal, extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(7):434–440. PMID: 31298723. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01
  • Albayrak S, Comba ÖB, Karakaya M. Visual performance and patient satisfaction following the implantation of a novel trifocal supplementary intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(5):2346–2352. PMID: 33158370. doi:10.1177/1120672120969042
  • McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5537–5545. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5341
  • MacRae S, Holladay JT, Glasser A, et al. Special report: American Academy of Ophthalmology task force consensus statement for extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(1):139–141. PMID: 27743644. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.039
  • Rocha-de-Lossada C, Zamorano-Martín F, Piñero DP, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Fernández J. Systematic review of the use of supplemental multifocal intraocular lenses in the ciliary sulcus for presbyopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(12):830–835. PMID: 34914553. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210920-01
  • Ang RE, Picache GCS, Rivera MCR, Lopez LRL, Cruz EM. A comparative evaluation of visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes of three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2339–2351. PMID: 32921975; PMCID: PMC7457879. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S255285
  • Reinhard T, Maier P, Böhringer D, et al. Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(2):431–442. PMID: 32915276; PMCID: PMC7843553. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5
  • Spadea L, Giannico MI, Formisano M, Alisi L. Visual performances of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens with a refractive design: a prospective study after bilateral implantation. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021;17:727–738. PMID: 34295162; PMCID: PMC8291859. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S320422
  • Liu J, Dong Y, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):198. PMID: 31477053; PMCID: PMC6719364. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0
  • Arrigo A, Gambaro G, Fasce F, Aragona E, Figini I, Bandello F. Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) AcrySof® IQ Vivity® intraocular lens implant: a real-life experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(9):2717–2722. PMID: 34050809. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05245-6
  • Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Clinical outcomes and quality of vision associated with bilateral implantation of a wavefront shaping presbyopia correcting intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4723–4730. PMID: 34983995; PMCID: PMC8699763. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S342947
  • Monaco G, Gari M, Di Censo F, Poscia A, Ruggi G, Scialdone A. Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: trifocal versus extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(6):737–747. PMID: 28732606. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.037