Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 17, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
183
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Early Clinical Experience with a New Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-Piece Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Steven C Schallhorn1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA;2 Optical Express, Glasgow, UK;3 Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
David Teenan2 Optical Express, Glasgow, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5489-0828
ORCID Icon,
Jan A Venter2 Optical Express, Glasgow, UK
,
Julie M Schallhorn1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA;4 F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
&
Stephen J Hannan2 Optical Express, Glasgow, UK
Pages 3419-3427 | Received 02 Aug 2023, Accepted 05 Oct 2023, Published online: 13 Nov 2023

References

  • Taketani F, Yukawa E, Yoshii T, Sugie Y, Hara Y. Influence of intraocular lens optical design on high-order aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(5):969–972. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.064
  • Schuster AK, Tesarz J, Vossmerbaeumer U. Ocular wavefront analysis of aspheric compared with spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: systematic review with metaanalysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):1088–1097. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.005
  • Lawu T, Mukai K, Matsushima H, Senoo T. Effects of decentration and tilt on the optical performance of 6 aspheric intraocular lens designs in a model eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(5):662–668. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.049
  • Liu Y, Zhao J, Hu Y, Li B, Wang J, Zhang J. Comparison of the visual performance after implantation of three aberration-correcting aspherical intraocular lens. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(3):333–340. doi:10.1080/02713683.2020.1798467
  • Schmid R. Early experience with the aspheric CT LUCIA 621P IOL. Host of design features add up to reliable optical performance. Ophthalmology Times. Available from: https://europe.ophthalmologytimes.com/microsites/zeiss-cataract-laser-vision-correction-cases/assets/f130cd99d6f6af815c3e70991df9b147-zeiss_case_of_the_month_10-20_en_32_025_0053i_screen.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2023.
  • Schallhorn SC, Bonilla M, Pantanelli SM. Outcomes of a multicenter U.S. clinical trial of a new monofocal single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(10):1126–1133. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000943
  • Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM. Long-term clinical results and scanning electron microscopic analysis of the aspheric, hydrophobic, acrylic intraocular lens CT LUCIA 611P(Y). Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1219–1227. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S167895
  • Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM. Surgical experience with a redesigned, fully preloaded, hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in challenging cases of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, phacodonesis, and small pupils. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:199–206. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S194420
  • Hienert J, Hirnschall N, Ruiss M, Ullrich M, Zwickl H, Findl O. Prospective study to compare axial position stability after fellow-eye implantation of 2 distinct intraocular lens designs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(8):999–1005. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000557
  • Wormstone IM, Damm NB, Kelp M, Eldred JA. Assessment of intraocular lens/capsular bag biomechanical interactions following cataract surgery in a human in vitro graded culture capsular bag model. Exp Eye Res. 2021;205(108487). doi:10.1016/j.exer.2021.108487
  • Liou HL, Brennan NA. Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. J Opt Soc Am Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14(8):1684–1695. doi:10.1364/josaa.14.001684
  • Hernandez-Martinez A, Diaz-Del-Rio MA, Ruiz-Santos M, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tana-Rivero P. Refractive and visual outcomes of a monofocal non-constant aberration aspheric intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:2521–2530. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S373587
  • Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM. Geometry of acrylic, hydrophobic IOLs and changes in haptic-capsular bag relationship according to compression and different well diameters: a bench study using computed tomography. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(2):711–727. doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00469-z
  • Yildirim TM, Schickhardt SK, Wang Q, Friedmann E, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Quantitative evaluation of microvacuole formation in five intraocular lens models made of different hydrophobic materials. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250860. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250860
  • Labuz G, Knebel D, Auffarth GU, et al. Glistening formation and light scattering in six hydrophobic-acrylic intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;196:112–120. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.032
  • Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Son HS, Merz P, Choi CY, Khoramnia R. In-vitro glistening formation in six different foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):126. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-01879-6
  • Nanavaty MA, Zukaite I, Salvage J. Edge profile of commercially available square-edged intraocular lenses: part 2. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(6):847–853. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.004
  • Ling R, Borkenstein EM, Borkenstein AF. Evaluation of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates in a real-life population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3249–3257. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S276329

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.