Determination of Refractive Error Using Direct Ophthalmoscopy in Children

References

• Kalikivayi V, Naduvilath TJ, Bansal AK, Dandona L. Visual impairment in school children in southern India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997;45(2):129–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay U, Maji D, Bhaduri G. Visual impairment in urban school children of low-income families in Kolkata, India. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56(2):163. doi:10.4103/0019-557X.99919
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prakash W, Marmamula S, Mettla A, Keeffe J, Khanna R. Visual impairment and refractive errors in school children in Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(6):2131–2139. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2949_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeladevi S, Seelam B, Nukella PB, Modi A, Ali R, Keay L. Prevalence of refractive errors in children in India: a systematic review. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(4):495–503. doi:10.1111/cxo.12689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena R, Sharma P, Gopal S, et al. National consensus statement regarding pediatric eye examination, refraction, and amblyopia management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(2):325–332. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_471_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat SJ. To prescribe or not to prescribe? Guidelines for spectacle prescribing in infants and children. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94(6):514–527. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00600.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimek DL, Cruz OA, Scott WE, Davitt BV. Isoametropic amblyopia due to high hyperopia in children. J AAPOS. 2004;8(4):310–313. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali K, Vidhya C, Murthy SR, Mallapa S. Cost-Effectiveness of photoscreeners in screening at-risk amblyopia in Indian children. Indian J Public Health. 2022;66(2):171–175. doi:10.4103/ijph.ijph_1848_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinori M, Molina I, Hernandez EO, et al. The plusoptix photoscreener and the retinomax autorefractor as community-based screening devices for preschool children. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(5):654–658. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1437453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongue AC, Cibis GW. Brückner test. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(10):1041–1044. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(81)80034-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe LD, Guyton DL. The red reflex from retinoscopy’s point of view. Reflections on a small area. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28(4):345–348. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(84)90099-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera A, Saornil MA, Zamora MI, Maderuelo A, Cañamares S, Pastor JC. Detecting amblyogenic diseases with the photographic Bruckner test. Strabismus. 1993;1(1):3–9. doi:10.3109/09273979309033847
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gole GA, Douglas LM. Validity of the Brückner reflex in the detection of amblyopia. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23(4):281–285. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb00177.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amitava A, Kewlani D, Khan Z, Razzak A. Assessment of a modification of Brückner′s test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(3):131. doi:10.4103/0974-620X.71890
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajalakshmi A, Rajeshwari M. Efficacy of Brückner’s test for screening of refractive errors by non-ophthalmologist versus ophthalmologist: a comparative study. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019;26(4):185. doi:10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_121_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari M. Can the Brückner test be used as a rapid screening test to detect significant refractive errors in children? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55(3):213. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.31943
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaMattina KC, Vagge A, Nelson LB. Can the red reflex test detect unequal refractive error? J Pediatr. 2019;214:175–177. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Rajashekar B, Kamath A, Gogate P. Comparison between Plusoptix A09 and gold standard cycloplegic refraction in preschool children and agreement to detect refractive amblyogenic risk factors. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(1):14. doi:10.4103/ojo.OJO_284_2019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iyer V, Saeed P, Saeed P. The Brückner Test Variant (BTV): a promising instrument in detecting vision disorders. Am Orthopt J. 2013;63(1):97–102. doi:10.3368/aoj.63.1.97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhayana AA, Prasad P, Azad SV. Refractive errors and the red reflex- Brückner test revisited. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(8):1381–1382. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2107_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuteja SY, Blaikie A, Kekunnaya R. Identification of amblyogenic risk factors with the Brückner reflex test using the low-cost Arclight direct ophthalmoscope. Eye. 2021;35(11):3007–3011. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01341-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI. Emmetropisation and the aetiology of refractive errors. Eye. 2014;28(2):169–179. doi:10.1038/eye.2013.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotwal NN, Kulkarni V, Khandgave T. Predictive value of brückner test in detecting refractive errors among children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar PS, Kamath YS. The utility of a direct ophthalmoscope in estimating the magnitude of refractive error using a modification of the Brückner test. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2021;16(5):411–415. doi:10.1080/17469899.2021.1945924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bani SAO, Amitava AK, Sharma R, Danish A. Beyond photography: evaluation of the consumer digital camera to identify strabismus and anisometropia by analyzing the Brückner’s reflex. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(10):608–611. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.121092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payerols A, Eliaou C, Trezeguet V, Villain M, Daien V. Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0247-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan XR, Jiao WZ, Li ZW, Xu WW, Li FJ, Wang LH. Performance of the plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0126052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar