One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

Christopher S SálesByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA

Edward E MancheByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 2229-2238 | Published online: 12 Nov 2014

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

NanbaAAmanoSOshikaTCorneal higher order wavefront aberrations after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusisJ Refract Surg200521465115724684
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LlorenteLBarberoSMerayoJMarcosSTotal and corneal optical aberrations induced by laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopiaJ Refract Surg20042020321615188896
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HershPSFryKBlakerJWSpherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Clinical results and theoretical models of etiologyJ Cataract Refract Surg2003292096210414670417
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LlorenteLBarberoSCanoDDorronsoroCMarcosSMyopic versus hyperopic eyes: axial length, corneal shape and optical aberrationsJ Vis2004428829815134476
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DesaiRUJainAMancheEELong-term follow-up of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis correction using the Star S2 excimer laserJ Cataract Refract Surg20083423223718242445
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChanAMancheEEEffect of preoperative pupil size on quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIKOphthalmology201111873674121093922
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GolasLMancheEEDry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomeJ Cataract Refract Surg2011371476148021684109
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MancheEEHawWWWavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis)Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc201110920122022253488
PubMedGoogle Scholar
DurrieDSSmithRTWaringGO4thStahlJESchwendemanFJComparing conventional and wavefront-optimized LASIK for the treatment of hyperopiaJ Refract Surg20102635636320506993
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KeirNJSimpsonTHutchingsNJonesLFonnDOutcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopiaJ Cataract Refract Surg20113788689321511156
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrintSFHigher order aberrations after LASIK for myopia with Alcon and wavelight lasers: a prospective randomized trialJ Refract Surg200521S799S80316329383
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MoshirfarMBettsBSChurginDSA prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight (R) Allegretto Wave (R) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue STAR S4 IR in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrationsClin Ophthalmol201151339134722034553
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PadmanabhanPMrochenMBasuthkarSViswanathanDJosephRWavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative studyJ Cataract Refract Surg20083438939718299062
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TranDBShahVHigher order aberrations comparison in fellow eyes following IntraLase LASIK with wavelight allegretto and custom cornea LADArvision4000 systemsJ Refract Surg200622S961S96417124897
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BababeygySRZoumalanCIChienFYMancheEEWavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for consecutive hyperopia and compound hyperopic astigmatismJ Cataract Refract Surg2008341260126618655974
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChenSFengYStojanovicAJankovMR2ndWangQIntraL-ase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisJ Refract Surg201228152422233436
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ZhangZHJinHYSuoYFemtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trialsJ Cataract Refract Surg2011372151215922108110
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date