Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions

References

• Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):214–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelmus KR. Review of clinical experience with microbial keratitis associated with contact lenses. CLAO J. 1987;13(4):211–214.
   Google Scholar
• Agi J, Rocchetti TT, Yu MCZ, et al. Three decades of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis in a referral Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020;82:7.
   Google Scholar
• Lam DSC, Houang E, Fan DSP, et al. Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America. Eye. 2002;16(5):608–618. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Carnt N. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Eye. 2012;26(2):185–193. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Naduvilath T, Keay L, et al. Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis in daily disposable contact lens wear. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan P, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, et al. International Contact Lens Prescribing in 2019. Contact Lens Spectrum; 2020. Avialable from: https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2020/january-2020/international-contact-lens-prescribing-in-2019. Accessed July 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Ophthalmic optics—Contact lens care products—Microbiological requirements and test methods for products and regimens for hygienic management of contact lenses; 2001. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/25382.html. Accessed July 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, Sutton SVW, Schlech BA. Review of standard for evaluating the effectiveness of contact lens disinfectants. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2002;56(1):37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Buck SL, Rosenthal RA, Schlech BA. Amoebicidal activity of multipurpose contact lens solutions. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(2):62–66. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.0000146322.63546.50
   Google Scholar
• Borazjani RN, Kilvington S. Effect of a multipurpose contact lens solution on the survival and binding of Acanthamoeba species on contact lenses examined with a no-rub regimen. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(1):39–45. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.0000146303.00326.69
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel MM, McAnally C, Bartell J. Antimicrobial efficacy of multipurpose disinfecting solutions in the presence of contact lenses and lens cases. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(2):125–131. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki K, Mizuno Y, Kitamura Y, Willcox M. The antimicrobial activity of multipurpose disinfecting solutions in the presence of different organic soils. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46(4):201–207. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano-Parra J, Bueno-Gimeno I, Lainez B, Córdoba J, Montés-Micó R. Antibacterial and antifungal effects of soft contact lens disinfection solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 1999;22(3):83–86. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(99)80043-5
   Google Scholar
• Hume EBH, Zhu H, Cole N, Huynh C, Lam S, Willcox MDP. Efficacy of contact lens multipurpose solutions against serratia marcescens. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(4):316–320. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180465543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume EBH, Flanagan J, Masoudi S, Zhu H, Cole N, Willcox MDP. Soft contact lens disinfection solution efficacy: clinical Fusarium isolates vs. ATCC 36031 Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(5):415–419. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31819fa239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Contact lens care products - Premarket Notification 510(k) guidance; 1997. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/72725/download. Accessed July 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JF, Perry DL, Stein JM, Randeri KJ. The margin of safety of polyquaternium-1 preserved lens care solutions: a phase I clinical study. CLAO J. 1988;14(2):76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Elferink JG. Thimerosal: a versatile sulfhydryl reagent, calcium mobilizer, and cell function-modulating agent. Gen Pharmacol. 1999;33(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00258-4
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, He Y, Zhou L, et al. Effects of contact lens solution disinfectants against filamentous fungi. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(12):1440–1445. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvany RE, Dougherty JM, McCulley JP, Wood TS, Bowman RW, Moore MB. The effect of currently available contact lens disinfection systems on Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(3):286–290. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(90)32590-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvany RE, Dougherty JM, McCulley JP. Effect of contact lens preservatives on Acanthamoeba. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(6):854–857. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32210-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti S, Fiori PL, Pinna A, Usai S, Carta F, Fadda G. Susceptibility of Acanthamoeba castellanii to contact lens disinfecting solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39(7):1596–1598. doi:10.1128/AAC.39.7.1596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Powell CH. Uptake and release phenomena in contact lens care by silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):29–36. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827d4f25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietschel RL, Wilson LA. Ocular inflammation in patients using soft contact lenses. Arch Dermatol. 1982;118(3):147–149. doi:10.1001/archderm.1982.01650150009010
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins C, Tuft S, Liu C, Buckley R. Limbal transplantation in the management of chronic contact-lens-associated epitheliopathy. Eye. 1993;7(Pt 5):629–633. doi:10.1038/eye.1993.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigen SR, Jacobs IH, Weinberger GI. Delayed hypersensitivity to thimerosal in contact lens solutions. J Med Soc N J. 1981;78(5):362–364.
   Google Scholar
• Mondino BJ, Salamon SM, Zaidman GW. Allergic and toxic reactions of soft contact lens wearers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1982;26(6):337–344. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(82)90126-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sertoli A, Di Fonzo E, Spallanzani P, Panconesi E. Allergic contact dermatitis from thimerosol in a soft contact lens wearer. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6(4):292–293. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1980.tb04941.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coward BD, Neumann R, Callender M. Solution intolerance among users of four chemical soft lens care regimens. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61(8):523–527. doi:10.1097/00006324-198408000-00006
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC, Kolli SP. Cytotoxicity of ophthalmic preservatives on human corneal epithelium. Lens Eye Toxic Res. 1992;9(3–4):361–375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen DQ, Srinivasan S, Hiscott P, Kaye SB. Thimerosal-induced limbal stem cell failure: report of a case and review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(4):196–198. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000247636.10720.19
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen OJ, Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H, Leivo P, Mäki M. Synergistic effect of ethyl-6-O-decanoyl glucoside and chlorhexidine in contact lens disinfection. APMIS. 1996;104(7–8):603–606. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00723-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M-a P-N, González-Muñoz P, Pérez-Mesonero R, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by poly(hexamethylene) biguanide hydrochloride in contact lens care solutions. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(6):373–376. doi:10.1111/cod.12730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasset AR, Ishii Y. Cytotoxicity of chlorhexidine. Can J Ophthalmol. 1975;10(1):98–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green K, Livingston V, Bowman K, Hull DS. Chlorhexidine effects on corneal epithelium and endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(7):1273–1278. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040125020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Refojo MF. Reversible binding of chlorhexidine gluconate to hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 1976;2(1):47.
   Google Scholar
• Shih KL, Raad MK, Hu JC, et al. Disinfecting activities of non-peroxide soft contact lens cold disinfection solutions. CLAO J. 1991;17(3):165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Parment PA, Colucci B, Nyström B. The efficacy of soft contact lens disinfection solutions against Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74(3):235–237. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00083.x
   Google Scholar
• Dracopoulos A, Dixon DG, Jones LW, Sivak JG, Bantseev V. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-hema-containing hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(1):26–37. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000229775.17844.3f
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, Dassanayake NL, Schlitzer RL, Schlech BA, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Biocide uptake in contact lenses and loss of fungicidal activity during storage of contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(6):262–266. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31802b413f
   Google Scholar
• Wright A, Mowrey-McKee M. Comparative cytotoxicity potential of soft contact lens care products. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2005;24(1):53–64. doi:10.1081/CUS-200046191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JA, Phillips KS, Hitchins VM, et al. Material properties that predict preservative uptake for silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(6):350–357. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318272c470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MJ, White GF, Morby AP. The response of Escherichia coli to exposure to the biocide polyhexamethylene biguanide. Microbiology. 2006;152(Pt 4):989–1000. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28643-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe R, Vallas V, Brennan NA. Comparative efficacy of contact lens disinfection solutions. CLAO J. 1992;18(1):34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Miller MJ, Callahan DE, McGrath D, Manchester R, Norton SE. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens. CLAO J. 2001;27(1):16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Abjani F, Khan NA, Jung SY, Siddiqui R. Status of the effectiveness of contact lens disinfectants in Malaysia against keratitis-causing pathogens. Exp Parasitol. 2017;183:187–193. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuj K, Gunderson C, Troupe J, Huber ME. Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(4):216–218. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000194922.53171.39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczotka-Flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J, et al. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions. Cornea. 2009;28(8):918–926. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a81835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa PC, Lui ACF, Silva CB, et al. Study of the effectiveness of multipurpose solutions on the bacterial disinfection of silicone hydrogel contact lenses in vitro. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 2):S24–S28. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Harmis N, Deshpande R, Tran D. Preliminary studies on the amoebicidal efficacy of contact lens disinfection systems. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1998;26(Suppl 1):S44–S46. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1998.tb01369.x
   Google Scholar
• Shoff ME, Joslin CE, Tu EY, Kubatko L, Fuerst PA. Efficacy of contact lens systems against recent clinical and tap water Acanthamoeba isolates. Cornea. 2008;27(6):713–719. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000611416.57783.a7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boost MV, Shi G-S, Lai S, Cho P. Amoebicidal effects of contact lens disinfecting solutions. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(1):44–51. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31823ac85e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston SP, Sriram R, Qvarnstrom Y, et al. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection in multiple contact lens solutions. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2040–2045. doi:10.1128/JCM.00575-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C, Stein J, Stone R, David R. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(4):166–174. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.0000152489.99455.DB
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12):753–761. doi:10.1097/00006324-200212000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry. 2008;79(8):444–454. doi:10.1016/j.optm.2008.04.097
   Google Scholar
• Young G, Keir N, Hunt C, Woods CA. Clinical evaluation of long-term users of two contact lens care preservative systems. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35(2):50–58. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31819630d3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipener C. Contact Lens Advisory in Scientific Studies (CLASS) group. A randomized clinical comparison of OPTI-FREE EXPRESS and ReNu MultiPLUS multipurpose lens care solutions. Adv Ther. 2009;26(4):435–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy CKM, Cho P, Boost MV. Cytotoxicity and effects on metabolism of contact lens care solutions on human corneal epithelium cells. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(2):198–206. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imayasu M, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y, Shimada S, Cavanagh HD. Effects of multipurpose solutions on corneal epithelial tight junctions. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(1):50–55. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318073cbdb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mori O, Kawaminami S. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of six multipurpose soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26(5):476–482. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck SL, Rosenthal RA, Abshire RL. Amoebicidal activity of a preserved contact lens multipurpose disinfecting solution compared to a disinfection/neutralisation peroxide system. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 1998;21(3):81–84. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(98)80027-1
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, McAnally CL, McNamee LS, Buck SL, Schlitzer RL, Stone RP. Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution. CLAO J. 2000;26(3):120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Codling CE, Maillard J-Y, Russell AD. Aspects of the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of a polyquaternium and an amidoamine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(5):1153–1158. doi:10.1093/jac/dkg228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, Bell WM, Abshire R. Disinfecting action of a new multi-purpose disinfection solution for contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 1999;22(4):104–109. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(99)80010-1
   Google Scholar
• Matoba AY, Peterson JR, Wilhelmus KR. Dendritiform keratopathy associated with exposure to polyquarternium-1, a common ophthalmic preservative. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(3):451–456. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan D, Kovacs C, Lynch S, Rah M. Biocidal efficacy of multipurpose solutions against gram-negative organisms associated with corneal infiltrative events. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(4):357–364. doi:10.1111/cxo.12509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman AB, Emch AJ, Geldis J, Nixon GJ, Mitchell GL. Contact lens corneal inflammatory events in a University population. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(1):42–49. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J. The comparative clinical performance of a new polyhexamethylene biguanide- vs a polyquad-based contact lens care regime with two silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(2):168–173. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen DA, Hickson-Curran SB, Jones LW, et al. Subjective comfort and physiology with modern contact lens care products. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):809–819. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens CW, Kannarr S, Zoota L, Lemp J. Lid Papillae improvement with hydrogen peroxide lens care solution use. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):933–942. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C, Wong S, Patel T, Garofalo R. The influence of lens care systems on eyelid tissue changes during silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(4):362–368. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2018.02.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutot M, Warnet J-M, Baudouin C, Rat P. Cytotoxicity of contact lens multipurpose solutions: role of oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity and P2X7 cell death receptor activation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;33(2):138–145. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia D, Lazon de la Jara P, Weng R, Naduvilath T, Willcox MDP. Short-term clinical comparison of two dual-disinfection multipurpose disinfecting solutions. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(1):7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayana BL, Rao P, Bhat S, Vidyalakshmi K. Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of various contact lens solutions to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Microbiol. 2018;2018:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindel W, Merchea MM, Rah MJ, Zhang L. Meta-analysis of the ocular biocompatibility of a new multipurpose lens care system. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:2051–2056.
   Google Scholar
• Fears AC, Metzinger RC, Killeen SZ, Reimers RS, Roy CJ. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of a novel contact lens multipurpose solution on Acanthamoeba castellanii. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2018;8(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12348-018-0161-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Chalmers RL, Dumbleton K, et al. The case for using hydrogen peroxide contact lens care solutions: a review. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(2):69–82. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinna A, Sechi LA, Zanetti S, et al. Bacillus cereus keratitis associated with contact lens wear1 1The authors have no financial interest in any material used in this study. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1830–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchea M The realities of hydrogen peroxide lens care use & misuse in today’s marketplace; 2017. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/103874/download. Accessed June 17, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, Stein JM, McAnally CL, Schlech BA. A comparative study of the microbiologic effectiveness of chemical disinfectants and peroxide-neutralizer systems. CLAO J. 1995;21(2):99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Yanai R, Yamada N, Ueda K, et al. Evaluation of povidone-iodine as a disinfectant solution for contact lenses: antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity for corneal epithelial cells. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(2):85–91. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg SJ. The ocular application of povidone-iodine. Community Eye Health. 2003;16(46):30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa M, Nakagawa R, Willcox MDP, Vijay AK. Effect of hygiene procedures on lens case contamination with povidone-iodine or multipurpose disinfecting solutions. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(6):563–569. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilvington S. Antimicrobial efficacy of a povidone iodine (PI) and a one-step hydrogen peroxide contact lens disinfection system. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2004;27(4):209–212. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2004.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T, Gibbon L, Mito T, Shiraishi A, Uno T, Ohashi Y. Efficacy of commercial soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against Acanthamoeba. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55(5):547–557. doi:10.1007/s10384-011-0062-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki K, Saito F, Ota R, Kilvington S. Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel povidone iodine contact lens disinfection system. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3):277–281. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar