Objective Analysis of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection

References

• Guillon M, Maissa C. Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30(1):5–10. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.00817098464
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney D. Silicone hydrogels: continuous-wear contact lenses. Butterworth-Heinemann Med. 2004;215.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26(6):157–162.11384832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, Coleman S. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(6):516–527.12477016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea. 2007;26(2):168–174.17251807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):93–99.23266586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(5):232–237.23522993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Efron N. Characteristics of the pre‐lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1991;11(1):53–58.2034456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Cedarstaff TH. Tear evaporation from the human eye: the effects of contact lens wear. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1982;5(4):141–147.
   Google Scholar
• Lacrimal Gland. Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R, Brennan NA. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68(5):380–384. doi:10.1097/00006324-199105000-000101852401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact lens wear affects tear film evaporation. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(6):326–330. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31818c5d0018997542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, King-Smith PE. Thinning rate of the precorneal and prelens tear films. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(7):2353–2361. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-009415980222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Tomlinson A. Importance of the lipid layer in human tear film stability and evaporation. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(1):8–13. doi:10.1097/00006324-199701000-000149148269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Lemp MA. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 1977;22(2):69–87. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(77)90087-X335548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Ibrahim OMA, Wakamatsu T, et al. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on ocular surface and tear functions in office workers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):933–940. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.02521871600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon JP. Tear film structure and contact lenses. In: holly FJ, ed. The preocular tear film in health, disease and contact lens wear. Lubbock TX Dry Eye Institute. 1986;85:914–939.
   Google Scholar
• Fatt I. A predictive model for dehydration of a hydrogel contact lens in the eye. J Br Contact Lens Assoc. 1989;12(2):15–31. doi:10.1016/S0141-7037(89)80017-5
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, May C, Nazar L, Simpson T. In vitro evaluation of the dehydration characteristics of silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2002;25(3):147–156. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(02)00033-416303487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N. In vivo dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(3):173–176. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.0000072825.23491.5912861112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benjamin WJ, Piccolo MG, Toubiana HA. Wettability: a blink by blink account. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1984;11(8):492–498.
   Google Scholar
• Carre A, Woehl P. Spreading of silicone oils on glass in two geometries. Langmuir. 2006;22(1):134–139. doi:10.1021/la051899716378411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemann D, Sickenberger W, Michel W, Marx S. Validation of an objective non-invasive method for a qualitative tear film assessment using a corneal topographer. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(Suppl):105246.
   Google Scholar
• Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, Gilbert DJ. A non-invasive instrument for clinical assessment of the pre-corneal tear film stability. Curr Eye Res. 1985;4(1):1–7. doi:10.3109/027136885089999603979089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden RK, Paugh JR, Wang C. Comparative study of two non-invasive tear film stability techniques. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13(4):263–269. doi:10.3109/027136894089957878033588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens–related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(4):1319–1328. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-139216565363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung S-W, Cho P, Chan B, Choy C, Ng V. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90(2):124–131. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00107.x17311574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clinic. 1994;21(5–6):82–95. doi:10.1016/0892-8967(94)90004-3
   Google Scholar
• Guillon M, McGrogan L, Guillon JP, Styles E, Maissa C. Effect of material ionicity on the performance of daily disposable contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;90(2):3–8. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(97)80029-X
   Google Scholar
• Carney FP, Keay L, Stapleton F, Morris CA, Willcox MD. Hydrogel lens wettability and deposition. In Vivo Clin Exp Optom. 1998;81(2):51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JS, Nick J, Winterton L, Lally J. Clinical performance of daily disposable soft contact lenses using sustained release technology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(3):127–134.16690347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Willcox MDP.The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(1):41–47.16497539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Chowdhury A. Objective clinical performance of ‘comfort-enhanced’ daily disposable soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(2):88–92.20149716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Varikooty J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(10):1450–1459.23018655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesna-Iskander DH, Iskander DR. Future directions in non-invasive measurements of tear film surface kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(5):749–759.22466103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesna DH. Assessing tear film on soft contact lenses with lateral shearing interferometry. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(6):342–347.21876438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae SM, Price HC. The effect of soft contact lens wear and time from blink on wavefront aberration measurement variation. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92(3):274–282.19351377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller C, Marx S, Wittekind J, Sickenberger W. Subjective comparison of pre-lens tear film stability of daily disposable contact lenses using ring mire projection. Clin Optom. 2020;12:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye/. 2013;36(5):232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx S, Sickenberger W. A novel in-vitro method for assessing contact lens surface dewetting: non-invasive keratograph dry-up time (NIK-DUT). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(6):382–388.28847466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehring D, Sickenberger W. Prospective Study for Validation and Evaluation of a Newly.developed Procedure for Objective Assessment of Degree of Conjunctival Redness Using a Video Topographer, Science and Technology. Jena (Germany): Ernst-Abbe-University; Master of Science; 2013:321.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe O, Zimmermann F, Marx S, Sickenberger W. Introducing a novel in vivo method to access visual performance during dewetting process of contact lens surface. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold S, Walter A, Eppig T, Bruenner H, Langenbucher A. Simultaneous examination of tear film break-up and the lipid layer of the human eye: a novel sensor design (Part 1). Z Med Phys. 2010;20(4):309–315.20884187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold S, Bruenner H, Langenbucher A. Simultaneous examination of tear film break-up and the lipid layer of the human eye: a novel model eye for time course simulation of physiologic tear film behavior (Part 2). Z Med Phys. 2010;20(4):316–319.20884189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta H, Aqil M. Contact lenses in ocular therapeutics. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(9–10):522–527.22305935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell D, Carnell SM, Eden RJ. Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1: comparative methodologies. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(3):254–262.23584047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read ML, Morgan PB, Maldonado‐Codina C. Measurement errors related to contact angle analysis of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;91(2):662–668.19582861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(1 Suppl):S101–S104.12772743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(1):40–46.10654857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods C, Jones L, Richter D, Fonn D. Comfort and vision with silicone hydrogel lenses: effect of compliance. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(6):421–425.20386353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkoff P, Nøjgaard JK, Troiano P, Piccoli B. Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(1):4–12.15613602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar