Smart Devices in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives to Clinical Optometry

References

• Bastawrous A, Suni AV. Thirty year projected magnitude (to 2050) of near and distance vision impairment and the economic impact if existing solutions are implemented globally. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020;27(2):115–120. doi:10.1080/09286586.2019.1700532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JH, Ramke J, Mwangi N, et al. Global eye health and the sustainable development goals: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e035789. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035789
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burn H, Hamm L, Black J, et al. Eye care delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(3):e004484. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das T, Keeffe J, Sivaprasad S, Rao GN. Capacity building for universal eye health coverage in South East Asia beyond 2020. Eye. 2020;34(7):1262–1270. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-0801-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogarty DT, Hogarty JP, Hewitt AW. Smartphone use in ophthalmology: what is their place in clinical practice? Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65(2):250–262. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens JLJ, Geuvers JR, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Digital tools for the self-assessment of visual acuity: a systematic review [published correction appears in Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):731–732]. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;10(4):715–730. doi:10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suo L, Ke X, Zhang D, et al. Use of Mobile Apps for Visual Acuity Assessment: systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2022;10(2):e26275. doi:10.2196/26275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Stanojcic N, Li JO, Thomas PBM. Visual Acuity Apps for Rapid Integration in Teleconsultation Services in all Resource Settings: a Review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2021;10(4):350–354. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansell K, Maconachie G, Bjerre A. Does the eyechart app for iPhones give comparable measurements to traditional visual acuity charts? Br Ir Orthopt J. 2020;16(1):19–24. doi:10.22599/bioj.146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hazari H, Curtis R, Eden K, Hopman WM, Irrcher I, Bona MD. Validation of the visual acuity iPad app eye chart pro compared to the standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study chart in a low-vision population. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(9):680–686. doi:10.1177/1357633X20960640
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nik Azis NN, Chew FLM, Rosland SF, Ramlee A, Che-Hamzah J. Parents’ performance using the AAPOS vision screening app to test visual acuity in Malaysian preschoolers. J AAPOS. 2019;23(5):268.e1–268.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.01.019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone-based visual acuity test (peek acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork [published correction appears in JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep; 133(9):1096]. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):930–937. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao L, Stinnett SS, Prakalapakorn SG. Visual acuity assessment and vision screening using a novel smartphone application. J Pediatr. 2019;213:203–210.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siti nor Aishah AR, Mutalib A, Asma H, et al. Development and validation of a new vision screening test algorithm for public use mobile application- A pilot study. Med J Malaysia. 2020;75(6):685–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdul Rahman SNA, Naing NN, Othman AM, et al. Validity and reliability of vis-screen application: a smartphone-based distance vision testing for visual impairment and blindness vision screening. Medicina. 2023;59(5):912. doi:10.3390/medicina59050912
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iskander M, Hu G, Sood S, et al. Validation of the New York University Langone eye test application, a smartphone-based visual acuity test. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022;2(3):100182. doi:10.1016/j.xops.2022.100182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tofigh S, Shortridge E, Elkeeb A, Godley BF. Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity. Eye. 2015;29(11):1464–1468. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiraset N, Poonyathalang A, Padungkiatsagul T, Deeyai M, Vichitkunakorn P, Vanikieti K. Comparison of visual acuity measurement using three methods: standard ETDRS chart, near chart and a smartphone-based eye chart application. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:859–869. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S304272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanyuda A, Kubota M, Kubota S, et al. Validation of a novel iPhone application for evaluating near functional visual acuity. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):22342. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-27011-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaido M. Functional Visual Acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14):DES29–DES35. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaido M, Dogru M, Ishida R, Tsubota K. Concept of functional visual acuity and its applications. Cornea. 2007;26(9 Suppl 1):S29–S35. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f6913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katada Y, Negishi K, Watanabe K, et al. Functional Visual Acuity of Early Presbyopia. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151094. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll N, Di Foggia E, Speeg-Schatz C, et al. Development and validation of a new method for visual acuity assessment on tablet in pediatric population: eMOVA test. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):180. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02360-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brucker J, Bhatia V, Sahel JA, Girmens JF, Mohand-Saïd S. Odysight: a mobile medical application designed for remote monitoring-A prospective study comparison with standard clinical eye tests. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(3):461–476. doi:10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffa LH, Balbaid NT, Ageel MM. “Smart Optometry” phone-based application as a visual acuity testing tool among pediatric population. Saudi Med J. 2022;43(8):946–953. doi:10.15537/smj.2022.43.8.20220374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Askarian B, Tabei F, Tipton GA, Chong JW Novel keratoconus detection method using smartphone. 2019 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies, HI-POCT 2019; 2019:60–62. doi:10.1109/HI-POCT45284.2019.8962648.
   Google Scholar
• Wintergerst MWM, Brinkmann CK, Holz FG, Finger RP. Undilated versus dilated monoscopic smartphone-based fundus photography for optic nerve head evaluation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10228. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28585-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophthalmic Sciences unveils world’s first AI contactless device for measuring eye fluid pressure. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/il/news-releases/ophthalmic-sciences-unveils-worlds-first-ai-contactless-device-for-measuring-eye-fluid-pressure-301438718.html. Accessed March 30, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Holekamp NM, Prospective HJS. Longitudinal study: daily self-imaging with home OCT for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022;6(7):575–585. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2022.02.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hakobyan L, Lumsden J, O’Sullivan D, Bartlett H. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(6):513–528. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senjam SS, Manna S, Bascaran C. Smartphones-based assistive technology: accessibility features and apps for people with visual impairment, and its usage, challenges, and usability testing [published correction appears in Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021 Dec 07;13:333–334]. Clin Optom. 2021;13:311–322. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S336361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senjam SS. The current advances in human-smartphone user interface design: an opportunity for people with vision loss. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(9):2544–2545. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_835_21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dockery DM, Krzystolik MG. The use of mobile applications as low-vision aids: a pilot study. R I Med J. 2020;103(8):69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tharaniy VE, Dharani R Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications as a tool to Improve Functional Vision and Quality of Life of Visually Impaired People. [ Unpublished Manuscript]; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Refractive Error RM. Still the heart of optometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(2):211–212. doi:10.1111/opo.12790
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen M, Wu A, Zhang L, et al. The increasing prevalence of myopia and high myopia among high school students in Fenghua city, eastern China: a 15-year population-based survey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):159. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0829-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priscilla JJ, Verkicharla PK. Time trends on the prevalence of myopia in India - A prediction model for 2050. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(3):466–474. doi:10.1111/opo.12806
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobia-Acquah E, Flitcroft DI, Akowuah PK, Lingham G, Loughman J. Regional variations and temporal trends of childhood myopia prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42(6):1232–1252. doi:10.1111/opo.13035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killeen OJ, Cho J, Newman-Casey PA, Kana L, Woodward MA. Barriers and facilitators to obtaining eyeglasses for vulnerable patients in a Michigan free clinic. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(3):243–249. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001661
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marmamula S, Keeffe JE, Raman U, Rao GN. Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilisation of refraction services in South India: rapid Assessment of Refractive Errors (RARE) Study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1):e000172. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douali MG, Silver JD. Self-optimised vision correction with adaptive spectacle lenses in developing countries. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(3):234–241. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00198.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith K, Weissberg E, Travison TG. Alternative methods of refraction: a comparison of three techniques. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(3):E176–E182. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181cf86d6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp AS, Shane TS, Kang J, Thomas B, Pole C, Lee RK. Evaluating self-refraction and ready-made spectacles for treatment of uncorrected refractive error. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018;25(5–6):392–398. doi:10.1080/09286586.2018.1500615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wen Q, Nasrazadani D, et al. Refractive accuracy and visual outcome by self-refraction using adjustable-focus spectacles in young children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141(9):853–860. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3508
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ocansey S, Amuda R, Abraham CH, Abu EK. Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2023;8(1):e001202. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilechie AA, Abokyi S, Owusu-Ansah A, Boadi-Kusi SB, Denkyira AK, Abraham CH. Self-refraction accuracy with adjustable spectacles among children in Ghana. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(4):456–463. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000561
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilechie AA, Abokyi S, Boadi-Kusi S, Enimah E, Ngozi E. Self-adjustable spectacle wearing compliance and associated factors among rural school children in Ghana. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(6):397–406. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Januschowski K, Bechtold TE, Schott TC, et al. Measuring wearing times of glasses and ocular patches using a thermosensor device from orthodontics. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(8):e635–e640. doi:10.1111/aos.12171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentsch MJ, Marsack JD, Anderson HA. Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(1):37–47. doi:10.1111/opo.12423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South J, Roberts P, Gao T, Black J, Collins A. Development of a spectacle wear monitor system: specsOn monitor. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(12):11. doi:10.1167/tvst.10.12.11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonas JB, Ang M, Cho P, et al. IMI prevention of myopia and its progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(5):6. doi:10.1167/iovs.62.5.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford KL, Richdale K, Kang P, et al. IMI - Clinical Management Guidelines Report. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M184–M203. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhakal R, Shah R, Huntjens B, Verkicharla PK, Lawrenson JG. Time spent outdoors as an intervention for myopia prevention and control in children: an overview of systematic reviews. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42(3):545–558. doi:10.1111/opo.12945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karthikeyan SK, Ashwini DL, Priyanka M, Nayak A, Biswas S. Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(3):728–739. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1564_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingham G, Mackey DA, Lucas R, Yazar S. How does spending time outdoors protect against myopia? A review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(5):593–599. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy D, Lin Chua SY, Saw SM. A review of environmental risk factors for myopia during early life, childhood and adolescence. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(6):497–506. doi:10.1111/cxo.12346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandary SK, Dhakal R, Sanghavi V, Verkicharla PK. Ambient light level varies with different locations and environmental conditions: potential to impact myopia. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal R, Huntjens B, Shah R, Lawrenson JG, Verkicharla PK. Influence of location, season and time of day on the spectral composition of ambient light: investigation for application in myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43(2):220–230. doi:10.1111/opo.13085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G, et al. Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(8):997–1000. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.150979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AN, Morgan IG, Mitchell P, Rose KA. Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: the Sydney adolescent vascular and eye study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(10):2100–2108. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1279–1285. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Zhang MZ, Hong RZ, Fu ZF, Pang MH, Tan DT. Near-work activity, night-lights, and myopia in the Singapore-China study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(5):620–627. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.5.620
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ip JM, Saw SM, Rose KA, et al. Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7):2903–2910. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You QS, Wu LJ, Duan JL, et al. Factors associated with myopia in school children in China: the Beijing childhood eye study. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52668. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Nieto FJ, Katz J, Chew SJ. Estimating the magnitude of close-up work in school-age children: a comparison of questionnaire and diary instruments. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6(4):291–301. doi:10.1076/opep.6.4.291.4184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari KR, Ostrin LA. Validation of the Clouclip and utility in measuring viewing distance in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40(6):801–814. doi:10.1111/opo.12735
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari KR, Ostrin LA. Objective measures of viewing behaviour in children during near tasks. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(7):746–753. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1971049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wen L, Lan W, Zhu H, Yang Z. A novel approach to quantify environmental risk factors of myopia: combination of wearable devices and big data science. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(13):17. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.13.17
   Google Scholar
• Wen L, Cao Y, Cheng Q, et al. Objectively measured near work, outdoor exposure and myopia in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(11):1542–1547. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Su M, Sun Y, et al. Clouclip combined with a questionnaire on the influence factors of myopia in children. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1228257. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1228257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen L, Cheng Q, Lan W, et al. An objective comparison of light intensity and near-visual tasks between rural and urban school children in china by a wearable device clouclip. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(6):15. doi:10.1167/tvst.8.6.15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari KR, Shukla D, Mirhajianmoghadam H, Ostrin LA. Objective measures of near viewing and light exposure in schoolchildren during COVID-19. Optom Vis Sci. 2022;99(3):241–252. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Lan W, Wen L, et al. An effectiveness study of a wearable device (Clouclip) intervention in unhealthy visual behaviors among school-age children: a pilot study. Medicine. 2020;99(2):e17992. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000017992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verkicharla PK, Ramamurthy D, Nguyen QD, et al. Development of the fitSight fitness tracker to increase time outdoors to prevent myopia. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017;6(3):20. doi:10.1167/tvst.6.3.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrin LA. Objectively measured light exposure in emmetropic and myopic adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(2):229–238. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and physical activity in myopic and emmetropic children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):330–341. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirhajianmoghadam H, Piña A, Ostrin LA. Objective and subjective behavioral measures in myopic and non-myopic children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(11):4. doi:10.1167/tvst.10.11.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott KS, Queener HM, Ostrin LA. The ipRGC-driven pupil response with light exposure, refractive error, and sleep. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(4):323–331. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaganathan S, Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Daily axial length and choroidal thickness variations in young adults: associations with light exposure and longitudinal axial length and choroid changes. Exp Eye Res. 2019;189:107850. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2019.107850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan SC, Cobice D, Richardson P, Sittlington JJ, Saunders KJ. Elevated melatonin levels found in young myopic adults are not attributable to a shift in circadian phase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(8):45. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.8.45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhakal R, Rudrapankte JR, Chittajallu HSNS, et al. Development and validation of a ‘MyLyt’ wearable light tracking device. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43(1):132–140. doi:10.1111/opo.13061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharani R, Lee CF, Theng ZX, et al. Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children. Eye. 2012;26(7):911–918. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez AA, Wildsoet CF. Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adult students. J Mod Opt. 2013;60(14):1200–1208. doi:10.1080/09500340.2013.845700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye B, Liu K, Cao S, et al. Discrimination of indoor versus outdoor environmental state with machine learning algorithms in myopia observational studies. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):314. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-2057-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Bakshi S, Ostrin EJ, Ostrin LA. Continuous objective assessment of near work. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6901. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43408-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro F, Ferreira TB, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S, Piñero DP. Analysis of daily visual habits in a presbyopic population. J Ophthalmol. 2023;2023:6440954. doi:10.1155/2023/6440954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Zakharov P, Tabakcι BN, Tanrιverdi C, Kιlιç A, Flitcroft DI. Visual lifestyle of myopic children assessed with AI-powered wearable monitoring. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(7):82.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy D, Samuel Paulraj AK, Lakshmi T, Rajagopalan T, Lavanya R. Development of smart spectacles to monitor and modify myopia-related health behaviour in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43(3):517–524. doi:10.1111/opo.13119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deemer AD, Bradley CK, Ross NC, et al. Low vision enhancement with head-mounted video display systems: are we there yet? Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(9):694–703. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 6 Vision enhancement devices you need to see. Available from: https://www.nanalyze.com/2017/04/6-vision-enhancement-devices/. Accessed October 28, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen XT, Koopman J, van Genderen MM, Stam HLM, Boon CJF. Artificial vision: the effectiveness of the OrCam in patients with advanced inherited retinal dystrophies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100(4):e986–e993. doi:10.1111/aos.15001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottingham E, Burgum F, Gosling S, Woods L, Tandon A. Assessment of the impact of a head-mounted augmented reality low vision aid on vision and quality of life in children and young people with visual impairment. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2024;20(1):57–68. doi:10.22599/bioj.345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crossland MD, Starke SD, Imielski P, Wolffsohn JS, Webster AR. Benefit of an electronic head-mounted low vision aid. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39(6):422–431. doi:10.1111/opo.12646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHG Technologies - Home. Available from: https://www.shgtechnologies.com/. Accessed October 28, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dagnelie G, Christopher P, Arditi A, et al. Performance of real-world functional vision tasks by blind subjects improves after implantation with the Argus® II retinal prosthesis system. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;45(2):152–159. doi:10.1111/ceo.12812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongphanit J, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in an older population. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):704–711. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01024-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa A, Tanaka M. The relationship between refractive errors and retinal detachment--analysis of 1,166 retinal detachment cases. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1988;32(3):310–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang MA, Congdon NG, Bykhovskaya I, Munoz B, West SK. The association between myopia and various subtypes of lens opacity: SEE (Salisbury Eye Evaluation) project. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1395–1401. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus MW, de Vries MM, Junoy Montolio FG, Jansonius NM. Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(10):1989–1994.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull PRK, Phillips JR. Ocular effects of virtual reality headset wear in young adults. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16172. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16320-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellrich J, Hoseini-Yazdi H, Read SA, Collins MJ, Bahmani H, Schilling T. Modulation of axial length by repeated blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head in human volunteers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64(8):5091.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur S, Dhakal R, Verkicharla PK. Short-term exposure to blue light shows an inhibitory effect on axial elongation in human eyes independent of defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(15):22. doi:10.1167/iovs.62.15.22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Tan X, et al. Effect of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia control in children: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(5):509–519. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torii H, Mori K, Okano T, et al. Short-term exposure to violet light emitted from eyeglass frames in myopic children: a randomized pilot clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6000. doi:10.3390/jcm11206000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tayyaba S, Ashraf MW, Alquthami T, Ahmad Z, Manzoor S. Fuzzy-based approach using IOT devices for smart home to assist blind people for navigation. Sensors. 2020;20(13):3674. doi:10.3390/s20133674
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bajpai S, Radha D, Smart phone as a controlling device for smart home using speech recognition, International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP). Chennai, India; 2019:0701–0705, doi: 10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8697923.
   Google Scholar
• Smart home technology creates Independence for patients with disabilities. Available from: https://www.optometrytimes.com/view/smart-home-technology-creates-independence-patients-disabilities. Accessed October 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar